MyBloodRunnethOrange
Jesus is Lord
- Joined
- Sep 12, 2004
- Messages
- 116,833
- Likes
- 24,377
1. Ty Chandler is a Heisman ability back but our staff is enamored with "spreading" the ball around to other backs throughout the game. It is very frustrating as he can and will be a stud in the league. Think Kamara on steroids.
2. 79 plays in a modern football game is not much for a defense to play. Its not ideal but definitely not a ridiculous number and not an excuse to give up 50.
3. From a pure physiological standpoint, KC is much better equipped to take the beating that our Oline allows our QBs to take.
4. We can and will beat Vandy if Ty is featured almost exclusively, the others are simply mop up type players.
5. There is NO way Missiouri has a night and day better roster of talent with the last 4 or 5 classes they have brought in, simply NO WAY.
6. We will win 10 next year if we play Shrout and feature Chandler.
Sturdier. Larger. Quicker release. Has a better internal clock. He just needs playing time. He's not better. He's just more experienced. A bit more poised in the pocket. But, he hasn't been beaten half to death, for 11 games.Technically... the defense gave up 36. Not that that should make anything better.
And what does it mean to be physiologically better able to take a beating?
Thinking about some of that...
Of the RB's, Chandler did have the best game last night.
Jordan seemed to be off right from the start.
Fils-Aime can't fumble on one of his few touches.
Banks seems to have disappeared since the RB-LB-RB switch around.
So, OP is probably correct that Chandler needs to roll vs Candybilt.
Not so sure about some of the other observations...
You know this because outside of the Texas A&M game, Alvin put up ridiculously good numbers right???
My problem with the OC is that evidently he doesn't keep score of the plays that worked well in previous weeks and try to integrate them in the coming weeks game plan. Can't understand how we are 11 games into the season and still haven't more ways to get Ty the ball. I am not sure if Helton has the complete reigns of the game plan for the team or not. For some reason after a game like Kentucky then Jordan just disappears. Its like a bi-polar offense. Of course the O-line has dictated what our offense is capable or incapable of doing no matter who is at QB or running back but the OC hasn't seemed to try to help much other than those behind the line passes in the Aubby game.
1. Ty Chandler is a Heisman ability back but our staff is enamored with "spreading" the ball around to other backs throughout the game. It is very frustrating as he can and will be a stud in the league. Think Kamara on steroids.
2. 79 plays in a modern football game is not much for a defense to play. Its not ideal but definitely not a ridiculous number and not an excuse to give up 50.
3. From a pure physiological standpoint, KC is much better equipped to take the beating that our Oline allows our QBs to take.
4. We can and will beat Vandy if Ty is featured almost exclusively, the others are simply mop up type players.
5. There is NO way Missiouri has a night and day better roster of talent with the last 4 or 5 classes they have brought in, simply NO WAY.
6. We will win 10 next year if we play Shrout and feature Chandler.