Ted Nugent on Parkland Kids

#32
#32
TennTom said:
A speaker event with numerous artists performing and numerous speakers requires some preparation. Quit being an idiot.
Click to expand...

You don't think they controlled the narrative? And I'm being the idiot? Out if all the speakers was there one second amendment advocate? Or, was it a gun grab free for all?
 
#36
#36
TennTom said:
In a thread dedicated to a bizarre, deranged, lunatic conspiratorialist, no less. You can't make this stuff up.



fdb272ed6a62f0037fd5412bf649434a.jpg
Click to expand...

Women’s March Leader Fueling Parkland Student Activist Protests | Breitbart
 
#38
#38
InVOLuntary said:
You don't think they controlled the narrative? And I'm being the idiot? Out if all the speakers was there one second amendment advocate? Or, was it a gun grab free for all?
Click to expand...
The event wasn't called March for Our Guns. I provided local documentation that he was invited and on the list. Choose to believe that or not. The actual truth is he didn't have the guts to stand before a huge crowd that wasn't receptive to his message.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#39
#39
TennTom said:
The event wasn't called March for Our Guns. I provided local documentation that he was invited and on the list. Choose to believe that or not. The actual truth is he didn't have the guts to stand before a huge crowd that wasn't receptive to his message.
Click to expand...

Or he wasn't really wanted? Was it it called "March to take your guns"? Like I said, your naivete is on full display.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#40
#40
What I found humorous about the march was how the media immediately went to screaming about how "800,000 people larger than Trump's Inauguration!"

Wait...let's dial that back a tad.

"200,000!"

And come to find out only 10% of the crowd were teenagers.

Only 10% of March for Our Lives 'student' protesters were under 18: Study - Washington Times

https://www.iheart.com/content/2018-03-28-teenagers-made-up-just-10-of-march-for-our-lives-crowd/

Here’s who actually attended the March for Our Lives. (No, it wasn’t mostly young people.) - The Washington Post

Furthermore, only 27% of the crowd had never protested before according to the last link above.

Explain to me again how this alleged spontaneity is a "movement."
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#41
#41
Grand Vol said:
What I found humorous about the march was how the media immediately went to screaming about how "800,000 people larger than Trump's Inauguration!"

Wait...let's dial that back a tad.

"200,000!"

And come to find out only 10% of the crowd were teenagers.

Only 10% of March for Our Lives 'student' protesters were under 18: Study - Washington Times

Study Claims Teenagers Made Up Just 10% Of '''March For Our Lives''' Crowd | iHeartRadio

Here’s who actually attended the March for Our Lives. (No, it wasn’t mostly young people.) - The Washington Post

Furthermore, only 27% of the crowd had never protested before according to the last link above.

Explain to me again how this alleged spontaneity is a "movement."
Click to expand...

Not to mention some were paid to attend.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#42
#42
InVOLuntary said:
Or he wasn't really wanted? Like I said, your naivete is on full display.
Click to expand...

You'd think he'd love the opportunity to have the eyes and ears of the opposition right there in front of him. I know I would.

Any opportunity to be a contrarian dick with a microphone in front of you should never, ever be wasted.
 
#44
#44
DinkinFlicka said:
You'd think he'd love the opportunity to have the eyes and ears of the opposition right there in front of him. I know I would.

Any opportunity to be a contrarian dick with a microphone in front of you should never, ever be wasted.
Click to expand...

There were not many other Dicks there I would assume. Plenty of ******* though.
 
#46
#46
hog88 said:
Which of the amendments in the BORs protected slavery?
Click to expand...

None, but that doesn't mean it was any less of a right (in particular states) prior to abolition. And your post was just that it's retarded to argue for taking away rights. There was no mention of BOR.

In the legal sense a right is just a legal entitlement to have or obtain something or to act in a certain way. So, yes, there was a right to own slaves in certain states in the US and the Constitution implicitly recognized that right through the 3/5 compromise.
 
#48
#48
DinkinFlicka said:
You'd think he'd love the opportunity to have the eyes and ears of the opposition right there in front of him. I know I would.

Any opportunity to be a contrarian dick with a microphone in front of you should never, ever be wasted.
Click to expand...

This is the Dink I know
 
#49
#49
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top