Ted Nugent on Parkland Kids

#51
#51
They can't eliminate it so they want to gut it.
Yep, just as I figured. No proof. Just more faux outrage with zero facts.

"Universal background checks, raising the age requirement to purchase a gun to 21, and laws blocking anyone with a history of mental health disorders or a criminal background or history or domestic violence from getting a firearm."
“I believe everybody should have their Second Amendment right to own a gun. I'm not trying to take that away. I am trying to put limitations on the Second Amendment in the same way that we have limitations on the First,” Hogg said.

The overwhelming majority of Americans agree with his stance.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#52
#52
Yep, just as I figured. No proof. Just more faux outrage with zero facts.

The overwhelming majority of Americans agree with his stance.

lol

You must have missed the hissy fit those kids pitched when the school went to IDs and clear bags as an infringement on their "First Amendment Rights."

Furthermore, if they are all about raising the legal age to buy a firearm to 21, we should raise the voting age to 21 as well. Because if I can't trust you to own a firearm at 18 years old, why would I trust you with something far more powerful like voting?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 people
#53
#53
#54
#55
#55
Yep, just as I figured. No proof. Just more faux outrage with zero facts.



The overwhelming majority of Americans agree with his stance.

BS.

You don't speak for the overwhelming majority of Americans.

You certainly don't speak for me.

Removing and/or reducing the rights of law abiding citizens doesn't make students safer.

If an 18 year old can be sent to war there should be no reason they can't legally buy a gun.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#56
#56
None of those links advocated the elimination of the 2nd Amendment. That wasn't even a nice try.

If you can't read between the lines then there's little hope you'll ever discover the truth.

The media is manipulating all of us.

This isn't about R or D. This is about the corporations that own the media and control the narrative.

Why so much coverage of the anti-gun students and so little coverage of the students like Kyle Kashuv who disagree.

The bias is overwhelming.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#57
#57
BS.

You don't speak for the overwhelming majority of Americans.

You certainly don't speak for me.

Removing and/or reducing the rights of law abiding citizens doesn't make students safer.

If an 18 year old can be sent to war there should be no reason they can't legally buy a gun.
Sixty-six percent of respondents said they would support more stringent laws, while just 31% said they would not. That’s the highest favorable percentage ever recorded by a Quinnipiac University National Poll, and a considerable increase from the 47% to 50% split measured in late 2015, according to an announcement from the school released Tuesday.

More Americans Than Ever Support Stricter Gun Laws: Poll | Time

Support for stricter gun laws has spiked in polls conducted after the fatal South Florida school shooting, hitting its highest level in at least a quarter-century.
Roughly 2 in 3 Americans now say gun control laws should be made more strict in the wake of the murder of 17 people at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School, according to a number of polls, including a new POLITICO/Morning Consult poll that shows support for stricter gun laws among registered voters at 68 percent, compared with just 25 percent who oppose stricter gun laws.

Gun control support surges in polls - POLITICO

You think I'm making this up? The evidence is overwhelming. Deal with it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#58
#58
Unbelievable. Lots of twisted people in this thread. Stop watching Fox News is all I have to say. Really sad. Stomach churning. Grown men in here calling these poor kids retarded. How many mass shootings have yall survived? How did it effect you? Right.

He is 18 right? He isn't a kid.


And there are a handful of us in here that have survived our fair share of shootings.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#59
#59
He would have been right at home then.

He's a total *****, clearly.

You can questions his sanity for wanting to speak but to think he was really given the opportunity is borderline stupidity and definitely ignorant. By the way did you enjoy the gathering?
 
#62
#62
Who really cares about what celebrities have to say? It doesn’t matter what Nugent, Roseanne, Popovich, Kerr, Lebron or any of the other multitude of celebrities say about a subject

Left wingers. They worship pop culture. I think its a coping mechanism to deal with their sh!t lives.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#63
#63
The event wasn't called March for Our Guns. I provided local documentation that he was invited and on the list. Choose to believe that or not. The actual truth is he didn't have the guts to stand before a huge crowd that wasn't receptive to his message.

Oh how dare you criticize one of the survivors of a mass shooting! Have you lived through one? How has it affected you? Don’t you know,
that if you do live through one, you are allowed to have an opinion that no one can criticize. Shame on you.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#65
#65
Yep, just as I figured. No proof. Just more faux outrage with zero facts.



The overwhelming majority of Americans agree with his stance.

And where's your proof he was welcomed? Just as I thought, liberal group think.
 
#66
#66
These kids don't understand "restrictions" any more than they do the foundation of the Second Amendment.

If government were to "restrict" their First Amendment right, they would create a law stating they couldn't speak in public forums until they reach the age of 18. That's a restriction of the right. Not something like shouting fire in a theater. Something they truly cannot understand.

But who am I to give advice to a bunch of know-it-all 17 year olds that obviously know way more about the matter than I do?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#67
#67

Why is the left attacking the NRA so hard?

The NRA doesn't sell guns. The NRA has nothing to do with Parkland.

It is obviously a purely political move used to damage politicians that receive campaign funds from the NRA.



90
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#69
#69
No I don't trust polling from left leaning Politico that is extremely vague with zero details of who was polled, when, where, etc.
There are many different polls that have been released post-Parkland. Then pick one more to your liking. They all are similar. I'm not arguing with someone who ignores consensus.
 
#70
#70
Yep, just as I figured. No proof. Just more faux outrage with zero facts.



The overwhelming majority of Americans agree with his stance.

Please tell me you see the ignorance in that statement.

“Hey I’m not responsible enough to buy a gun but you should listen to me and let me vote”
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#71
#71
None, but that doesn't mean it was any less of a right (in particular states) prior to abolition. And your post was just that it's retarded to argue for taking away rights. There was no mention of BOR.

In the legal sense a right is just a legal entitlement to have or obtain something or to act in a certain way. So, yes, there was a right to own slaves in certain states in the US and the Constitution implicitly recognized that right through the 3/5 compromise.

Congress or state legislature passing a law allowing something isn’t a constitutional right.
 
#72
#72
Why is the left attacking the NRA so hard?

The NRA doesn't sell guns. The NRA has nothing to do with Parkland.

It is obviously a purely political move used to damage politicians that receive campaign funds from the NRA.

90

Pure definition of ironic.

One group using its First Amendment right to call for the dismantlement of an organization that uses its First Amendment right to defend another Amendment.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 people
#73
#73
Why is the left attacking the NRA so hard?

The NRA doesn't sell guns. The NRA has nothing to do with Parkland.

It is obviously a purely political move used to damage politicians that receive campaign funds from the NRA.



90
I've not mentioned the NRA. Why are you deflecting?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#75
#75
There are many different polls that have been released post-Parkland. Then pick one more to your liking. They all are similar. I'm not arguing with someone who ignores consensus.

Bet you had a hard time swallowing that Wednesday after the election in 2016. Remember those "polls"? Consensus of the biggest landslide win in history? muhahahaha.



Morale of the story: Polling is not infallible so use a little critical thinking and reasoning.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person

VN Store

Back
Top