gordonr24
Vol in West TN
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2010
- Messages
- 20,967
- Likes
- 33,298
OK, I had to check to see who you were responding to. You mean to tell me that the boring troll BOT was defending the a-hole troll Hooker?The headline wasn't "Nico gets more NIL" the headline was asking a clickbait type question to entice clicks "Did Nico DEMAND..."
The burden of proof isn't on the person saying "did they demand more NIL" it's on the person making the accusation to begin with.
Great example for ya...
Seahawks OVERPAY Geno Smith to miss playoffs again
vs
Geno Smith receives bonuses despite Seahawks missing playoffs
Neither is technically wrong, but the tone of the article and the types of readers drawn in are going to vary with those headlines. The bonuses/incentives Geno Smith received were negotiated into the contract prior to the season and were personal without being tied to team performance...
I don't even mind Hooker that much. He's fine and is what he is. Maybe a little bit jaded from the decade of incompetence and feels like the negative take is always the safe bet when it comes to UT athletics.Here's a few of Dave Hooker's headlines.....View attachment 714523View attachment 714524View attachment 714525
Dave Hooker is the new John Adams. He's cut from the same cloth has Chad Pennington and Tyler Ivens. For every positive storyline, there's at least 5 negatives they talk about or manufacture. The Knoxville media does more to damage the look of UT, than the fans ever have.
A few of the ones of Knoxville sports talk that I like and respect their opinion....
John Wilkerson
Jason Swain
Brian Rice
Josh Ward
They can discuss TN sports (good or bad) without trolling the fan base. The ones I listed above are some of the worst for spinning the narrative to be worse than it really is. They don't all have to be sunshine pumpers but they shouldn't always be negative either. We need a few more "homers" covering the VOLS, or at least some reporters/shows that write positive stories/sports talk and not constantly beating on the teams, coaches, and fans.
Your turn. Give me a list of your favorites and the ones you don't like. Let me know why you feel the way you do about them.
Or that girl he has/had on there for a while. She's a stinkin' bammerI don't even mind Hooker that much. He's fine and is what he is. Maybe a little bit jaded from the decade of incompetence and feels like the negative take is always the safe bet when it comes to UT athletics.
Ole haircut though, can't do it. If he's on there I can't watch it.
Hooker feeds ol' haircut the 'foil' role. They are two parts of the same script.I don't even mind Hooker that much. He's fine and is what he is. Maybe a little bit jaded from the decade of incompetence and feels like the negative take is always the safe bet when it comes to UT athletics.
Ole haircut though, can't do it. If he's on there I can't watch it.
How to refute? Easy. Find someone who has different information regarding the same situation as Hooker did. Say you like Basilio or Swain? Then find if they have discussed the same things as Hooker and see if they have conflicting information. Pretty basic stuff you should be able to handle.Your turn. Give me a list of your favorites and the ones you don't like. Let me know why you feel the way you do about them.
Show me how to refute, BOT
Love the idea of the kids having to pay a buyout if they transfer.
Also think these contracts should be a 2 year minimum with penalties if they try to transfer before the 2 years.
Contracts eliminate the stupid off season negotiations….at least for the first 2 years.
This is why so many people have you on ignore. You either pick at posters during bad games (especially when everyone is already ticked off) or like today, you posted some trash click bait about a fan favorite, just because it had a controversial headline. When someone iniates you in the topic and gives you their point of view (with examples), you respond back with something like "I need more examples" or "do your own research and post it" or "refute". I never mentioned Basilio, so that tells me you didn't really read my post.How to refute? Easy. Find someone who has different information regarding the same situation as Hooker did. Say you like Basilio or Swain? Then find if they have discussed the same things as Hooker and see if they have conflicting information. Pretty basic stuff you should be able to handle.
Look Hooker hasn’t been right about everything. But he has been right about quite a bit over the years. For the record, Hooker is big time pro Nico.