With a roster full of talent and experience it is really that simple imo.
No injuries and plenty of experience and I am out of patience.
It's a put out or get out mentality for me.
3 years in with a superior roster and no injuries that simplistic approach needs to be accepted by more here IMO
With a roster full of talent and experience it is really that simple imo.
No injuries and plenty of experience and I am out of patience.
It's a put out or get out mentality for me.
3 years in with a superior roster and no injuries that simplistic approach needs to be accepted by more here IMO
Why don't you actually use this argument instead off all this other dumb **** about half season.
How about this novel approach. Let's wait till the end of the SEC tournament, then figure out where we stand as a program, instead of using three games as some sort of actual data that matters.
The entire point of this thread which was stated after game 1 was to see if martin had developed as a coach.
Not one poster thought 14-6 was an unfair benchmark for measuring his growth as a coach.
Now that it looks unlikely you guys defending a coach that hasnt grown into the coach we deserve are coming out of the woodwork asking for more time.
To hell with more time. Zero excuse for defending a coach that hasnt developed at all and has a worse pre feb winning % less than buzz!!
No. BS. You are talking about his first 3 YEARS! Not just this year. Now, you are changing your argument. How can you be taken seriously?
I understand being disappointed this year, but your numbers compared the first 3 years of those coaches. SMDH.
And this entire thread is about pre February records.
Which is why we have been an nit team back to back years after 6 straight dancing trips
The entire point of this thread which was stated after game 1 was to see if martin had developed as a coach.
Not one poster thought 14-6 was an unfair benchmark for measuring his growth as a coach.
Now that it looks unlikely you guys defending a coach that hasnt grown into the coach we deserve are coming out of the woodwork asking for more time.
To hell with more time. Zero excuse for defending a coach that hasnt developed at all and has a worse pre feb winning % less than buzz!!
You are so wrong. I always wait until the end of the year to see. But comparing him to the other coaches is so, so, simple minded. They are different circumstances. Buzz inherited more experienced talent than CCM did and Green had gone to 4 tournaments! Green inherited some serious talent from O'Neil. If you just want to look at those numbers, then so be it. But it is so stupid to do so without looking behind the numbers. If CCM doesn't make the tournament this year, then we need to find a coach who can. But let this crap go.
Edit: Sorry, zjc, I hope you know this wasn't for you. Somehow, Bruin messed up the quotes.
Chris
The act is old for most here because its 100% true.
The pre February record was brought up because it was the portion of the season that made the first two seasons failures and possibly a 3rd this year.
When evaluating a coaches ability to lead a program obvious weaknesses are going to be discussed and when they aren't corrected they become reasons to discuss other options.
Half season has 2 games left to prove he has developed past this huge weakness as our coach. Most here agreed 14-6 was a fair measuring stick when made in November but now that it doesn't fit for the appologist it just isn't long enough.
This program deserves a leader that puts a team on the court that will play to its potential for a larger portion of the season and that is an unarguable fact backed up by records that show half season behind buzz and just ahead of wade in pre feb winning %.
At this point, everyone's lot should be cast. You're either in or out. If in two and a half seasons, you haven't picked a side of the fence to stand on, then I hardly see how two games is going to be the great equalizer.
.
I just dont get how the next two games change anything. If he wins them, does it change anything? Not really. Two wins won't erase losses to UTEP, NCSU, and aTm. It just seems so myopic and irrelevant. If people don't support him now, two games shouldn't make a difference, win or lose.
At this point, everyone's lot should be cast. You're either in or out. If in two and a half seasons, you haven't picked a side of the fence to stand on, then I hardly see how two games is going to be the great equalizer.
I think it's just been something for your to talk about for the past four months. This time next week, you'll have moved on to something else by default I guess.
So what prize is won here if Martin goes 1-1 over the next two or 2-0. What are you going to do Bruin? Create another thread about after Feburary record? Or will you gloat and carry on if he goes 0-2. I just don't see the point.
So what prize is won here if Martin goes 1-1 over the next two or 2-0. What are you going to do Bruin? Create another thread about after Feburary record? Or will you gloat and carry on if he goes 0-2. I just don't see the point.
The other thread was made at the same time. It was meant for discussion on what was different with the staff because they have been completely the opposite after Febuary 1st.
Half season had to prove to me that he developed Into a capable coach all year. If he proves otherwise I am done supporting him.