RyanWalkerPGH
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Mar 6, 2016
- Messages
- 1,856
- Likes
- 4,655
I don't think any reasonable person would have rated my concern at a level of "panic", which isn't to say your comments were pointed at me directly. Maybe they were, maybe they weren't, but we had several debates surrounding the issue.Wait, you mean like, the panic/reaction was a bit premature?
My post wasn’t directed at you specifically, or any 1 poster for that matter, but just the general mindset that quite a few people seeemed to have and that I didn’t. As I’ve said before there were mentions of firing 2 assistants because of our recruiting, that’s looking a bit foolish. However as for your post, once again you mention this exhaustive list, and even throw out the number 20-ish, as I detailed before that’s really misleading and not accurate at all.I don't think any reasonable person would have rated my concern at a level of "panic", which isn't to say your comments were pointed at me directly. Maybe they were, maybe they weren't, but we had several debates surrounding the issue.
While things certainly seem to be taking a turn for the better with regards to our recruiting fortune, it's also not unreasonable to acknowledge that we went thru a lot of bodies to get to this point, as well. I think that we all universally agree that Barnes is going to grab kids from somewhere, at some point, and make a competitive team. And frankly, if this were 25 years ago, we'd never know about all the misses and simply celebrate the kids we landed and enjoy their careers. Access to all the information in the age of internet access, for better or worse, reveals the warts as well as the wins. Missing on numerous targets to whittle the exhaustive list of 20-ish targets down to 5 actual options is nerve-wracking. It put us in a position where we pretty much had to nail down all of those remaining guys, or start fresh at the drawing board. And with our recent success, you'd think it wouldn't come to that for a program with the kind of trajectory we've had.
I was just referring to the list of players that we were recruiting. To which degree is certainly up for debate, but to see that list of 20 or so potential options continue to shrink to 5 or 6 with only one commitment was concerning. It just felt like we had put ourselves in a position where we had to bat close to 1.000 on our final remaining targets in order to deem the fall class a success, which is a dangerous proposition. It seems like thise concerned with recruiting would have found our final class more palatable if the commitments had landed over the course of the spring/summer rather than backloaded into the fall. For example, if had landed Phillips in May, Dilione in June, and Estrella in July, then you'd have probably not heard as much concern over recruiting.My post wasn’t directed at you specifically, or any 1 poster for that matter, but just the general mindset that quite a few people seeemed to have and that I didn’t. As I’ve said before there were mentions of firing 2 assistants because of our recruiting, that’s looking a bit foolish. However as for your post, once again you mention this exhaustive list, and even throw out the number 20-ish, as I detailed before that’s really misleading and not accurate at all.
Tennessee pushed for/prioritized: Justin Edwards, Coen Carr, Aden Holloway, Freddie Dilione, JP Estrella, Cade Phillips and Silas Demary by my recollection. They’ve landed 2 of those, and look poised to land a 3rd from that group, “missing” on Edwards, Carr, Holloway and Demary. Demary could be argued as not a miss as Tennessee seemed to view that as either or, we can call Holloway a miss and I’ll give you that, but we also seemed to identify Dilione and make a push for him shortly after a Holloway OV, and clearly Dilione is the guy currently viewed as the better player. So 3/7 we can say if you want to include all of those guys, 3/6 if no Demary…I wouldn’t really consider that missing on a bunch of bodies, especially when it looked quite clear for awhile what/who their plan was.
I said way back when you and I discussed this topic and the assistants before that if come fall we are struggling and don’t have a nice class put together I would then have some concerns, and wouldn’t blame anyone for the same, looks like they are going to put together one of the best fall classes Tennessee has ever seen though.
Sure, but like I said at those times they weren’t guys we were pursuing, so that should probably be taken into account. The guys we were prioritizing were saying in interviews that they were looking to make commitments in August/September etc, so that was the timeline that would make sense. Looking at 247 rankings today 74/150 are committed, they aren’t all to P5 schools but let’s say they are…there’s like 65-70 P5 teams, so that would be 1 per. Obviously many schools have more, not suggesting there aren’t any, but most seem to be around 1-2 commits as of today.I was just referring to the list of players that we were recruiting. To which degree is certainly up for debate, but to see that list of 20 or so potential options continue to shrink to 5 or 6 with only one commitment was concerning. It just felt like we had put ourselves in a position where we had to bat close to 1.000 on our final remaining targets in order to deem the fall class a success, which is a dangerous proposition. It seems like thise concerned with recruiting would have found our final class more palatable if the commitments had landed over the course of the spring/summer rather than backloaded into the fall. For example, if had landed Phillips in May, Dilione in June, and Estrella in July, then you'd have probably not heard as much concern over recruiting.
And from a thousand foot perspective, that likely seems neurotic...it probably is, but a lot of times, people are prisoners of the moment, so it isn't entirely surprising to view it as struggling. Just like the baseball player mired in an 0-30 slump who breaks out and hits 4 homers in an 8-game span while going 16-30. Now, all of a sudden, he's hitting .267 with 4 HRs across those 60 ABs, which is plenty good. That average across 600 ABs in a season gives you a .267 hitter with 40 HRs.
from 247…So can anyone who has seen this kid play give me the low down on how he plays? Is he a stretch big?
BTO and Chris - how does he compare to Fulkerson as a freshman? Your opinion of course.
I agree that stylistically they don't really compare much, but I'm not sure I'd say Estrella will come in and play more, early, either. Fulk averaged a hair over 17 mpg prior to the game he was hurt in as a freshman, starting 6 games, and he only played a total of 20 minutes in his first 3 games. Over the next 6, he averaged almost 23 mpg. Fulk played mostly out of necessity on a team with little proven talent and even less experience. Estrella will still have Aidoo and possibly Uros ahead of him, so I'm not sure I'd expect him to average 17.3 mpg as a freshman unless Aidoo and/or Plavsic move on. He may approach that if Plav moves on and Aidoo can't handle 28 minutes.Not sure there’s really any comparison, Estrella’s game is much different and he should be able to play more early.