'10 GA RB Mack Brown

#251
#251
Do we want another guy exactly like David Oku? On rivals it says that Mack reminds them of Oku. Not a knock on either player just wasn't sure if we are trying to get different types of backs.
 
#252
#252
Incinigator said:
You have a mammoth lack of a realistic understanding of the current state AND recent history of college football. To you, Miami (last NC 2001, both NCs while in Big East) and FSU's (ACC,last NC 1999) impressive run are the only successful programs ? So, you disregard Spurrier's NC (1996) and SEC titles. Tebow was 9 years old.

To say Florida has had a VERY high level of success is RIDICULOUS and only the rambling of a bitter, uneducated rival. Certainly not the opinion of someone who knows about the history of college football.

Since 1995, UM 133-51, FSU 135-48, and
UF 147-39. FYI, UF is in the SEC. UM and FSU are ACC.

Scholarship reductions leveled the playing field when dropped to 92 then 88 and finally 85 in 1994.

Rant against and hate UF as a fan of ut as loud as you can. But, to use college football history to diminish UF's RECENT LONG TERM SIGNIFICANT HIGH LEVEL of success is ludicrous and ignorant. Success is success. I hate the Patriots but they're still successful.:clapping:
Click to expand...

So, you've only been playing football since '95?? Yeah, I guess 14 years of relevant football constitutes a high level of success. :eek:lol:

Look, you haven't had but recent success at the D-1 level of college football. Bama and UT are the most relevant teams of the SEC there troll. You've made some progress in the past 15 years that you have pointed out, but you still have a LONG way to catch up. Thanks for playing though.
 
#253
#253
g8terh8ter_eric said:
So, you've only been playing football since '95?? Yeah, I guess 14 years of relevant football constitutes a high level of success. :eek:lol:

Look, you haven't had but recent success at the D-1 level of college football. Bama and UT are the most relevant teams of the SEC there troll. You've made some progress in the past 15 years that you have pointed out, but you still have a LONG way to catch up. Thanks for playing though.
Click to expand...

Interestingly enough, UF has played football for quite a bit longer than 14 years since you did not know.

I know. Unless your program can claim multiple NC's from the 30's to the 60's then your program is worthless. Whatever makes you feel better ?

What does the "most relevant" trophy look like ? I think I saw a DVD titled "The Most Relevant Football Teams in NCAA history" on the best seller list. Might want to pick one up.

Tough standards when 3 NCs in the last 13 years is "some success".
What would one NC in 11 years be considered ? How about two in 42 years ? What about 3 in 58 years ?

If only UF had spread their 3 titles out over 45 more years, then might you consider UF a relevant program ?

Oh well. Enjoy your jaded dream world.
 
#255
#255
Incinigator said:
Interestingly enough, UF has played football for quite a bit longer than 14 years since you did not know.

I know. Unless your program can claim multiple NC's from the 30's to the 60's then your program is worthless. Whatever makes you feel better ?

What does the "most relevant" trophy look like ? I think I saw a DVD titled "The Most Relevant Football Teams in NCAA history" on the best seller list. Might want to pick one up.

Tough standards when 3 NCs in the last 13 years is "some success".
What would one NC in 11 years be considered ? How about two in 42 years ? What about 3 in 58 years ?

If only UF had spread their 3 titles out over 45 more years, then might you consider UF a relevant program ?

Oh well. Enjoy your jaded dream world.
Click to expand...

I hate the fact that your facts are correct and I agree with your opinions. IMO, the gators gained relevance under Spurrier as we did under Fulmer. We may have had a slightly better old school history, but the gators have been better since TOBC smacked Okie St . Period. National titles with two coaches. That demands respect. But it's still F y'all till I die. Don't we still lead the series??
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#256
#256
PimpVol said:
I hate the fact that your facts are correct and I agree with your opinions. IMO, the gators gained relevance under Spurrier as we did under Fulmer. We may have had a slightly better old school history, but the gators have been better since TOBC smacked Okie St . Period. National titles with two coaches. That demands respect. But it's still F y'all till I die. Don't we still lead the series??
Posted via VolNation Mobile
Click to expand...

Nope with their win this year they took the overall series lead.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#257
#257
kiffincrazy28 said:
Nope with their win this year they took the overall series lead.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
Click to expand...

Then it's really F 'em! We will have it back in 2 seasons. Oscar Meyer will be kicking his visor when we get done with his spread offense.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
Last edited:
#258
#258
PimpVol said:
I hate the fact that your facts are correct and I agree with your opinions. IMO, the gators gained relevance under Spurrier as we did under Fulmer. We may have had a slightly better old school history, but the gators have been better since TOBC smacked Okie St . Period. National titles with two coaches. That demands respect. But it's still F y'all till I die. Don't we still lead the series??
Posted via VolNation Mobile
Click to expand...

Pimp, I respect the **** out of ya. Think we share the same perspective. FYI, my F y'all is reserved for those black and red idiots. I only severely dislike vol fan.

Great question. I did not know but upon research, UF now leads 20-19. Not as big a deal to me as SEC and National titles but good ammo for this site IF I need it.
:good!:
 
#259
#259
Incinigator said:
Pimp, I respect the **** out of ya. Think we share the same perspective. FYI, my F y'all is reserved for those black and red idiots. I only severely dislike vol fan.

Great question. I did not know but upon research, UF now leads 20-19. Not as big a deal to me as SEC and National titles but good ammo for this site IF I need it.
:good!:[/QUOTE. ]
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
#260
#260
Incinigator said:
Pimp, I respect the **** out of ya. Think we share the same perspective. FYI, my F y'all is reserved for those black and red idiots. I only severely dislike vol fan.

Great question. I did not know but upon research, UF now leads 20-19. Not as big a deal to me as SEC and National titles but good ammo for this site IF I need it.
:good!:
Click to expand...

We only truly hate Bama. We own Georgia and only recently have it in for the gators. Y'all lizards cost us big in the mid 90's. Since then it has become a mind game. Even though we won in 98, we did not "beat" y'all. 03 was a good physical win that I watch every now and then just to revel in it's glory. 04 was a beauty as well. But what in the hell does any of this have to do with Mack Brown?
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#261
#261
PimpVol said:
We only truly hate Bama. We own Georgia and only recently have it in for the gators. Y'all lizards cost us big in the mid 90's. Since then it has become a mind game. Even though we won in 98, we did not "beat" y'all. 03 was a good physical win that I watch every now and then just to revel in it's glory. 04 was a beauty as well. But what in the hell does any of this have to do with Mack Brown?
Posted via VolNation Mobile
Click to expand...

We didn't 'beat' them? Huh? Alabama this year says a win is a win
 
#262
#262
the.one.the.only said:
We didn't 'beat' them? Huh? Alabama this year says a win is a win
Click to expand...

Oh, we beat their ass alright. I just meant it would be nice to beat them 35-10 or some such score. Maybe like a statement win, of which they have plenty against us. The 01 game comes to mind, just a higher margin of victory. A win is a win though, no doubt.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#263
#263
Incinigator said:
Interestingly enough, UF has played football for quite a bit longer than 14 years since you did not know.

I know. Unless your program can claim multiple NC's from the 30's to the 60's then your program is worthless. Whatever makes you feel better ?

What does the "most relevant" trophy look like ? I think I saw a DVD titled "The Most Relevant Football Teams in NCAA history" on the best seller list. Might want to pick one up.

Tough standards when 3 NCs in the last 13 years is "some success".
What would one NC in 11 years be considered ? How about two in 42 years ? What about 3 in 58 years ?

If only UF had spread their 3 titles out over 45 more years, then might you consider UF a relevant program ?

Oh well. Enjoy your jaded dream world.
Click to expand...

Do remember though, Florida football had not had a SEC Championship pre-Spurrier (first one in 1991). Like I said, and you keep arguing with me like a typical troll whose reading comprehension is not always best, you have made strides in the past 15 years and continue to do so. You guys have a great program down there, just try to keep in perspective that most of your fans are bandwagon fans and never really experienced anything remotely "high level success" before that. Even Miami and FSU before the 80's didn't have much success, but they were still winning 5-10 years before you guys were. You also owe the SEC for separating itself as the dominate conference in the mid-late 90's as a BIG part of your success and the fact that you have great weather down there, aside from the occasional hurricane. I'm not as uneducated as you might think. Just think if South Florida were in the SEC, somehow I don't think that you would be NEAR as successful.
 
#264
#264
Incinigator said:
Back to topic. Isn't Dyer a better option for ut anyway ? My brief impression is Mack is more versatile and workmanlike where as Dyer is more feature back. Granted, I think Mack's been hurt for most of this year.

Also, wouldn't having 2 Browns at RB be confusing ? "Brown, get in there !" Uh oh...flag for 12 men on the field. Drive over.
Click to expand...

I'm pretty sure that both his hamstrings have been bothering the whole season.
 
#271
#271
Hear it was quick and to the point basically telling Mack that he's the only rb that they want this year and he would see more carries at UT than UF next year as a freshmen.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top