RhodeIslandVol
In 25 characters or less!
- Joined
- Dec 12, 2008
- Messages
- 2,141
- Likes
- 13
What's so impressive about Hendrix?
Posted via VolNation Mobile
His mechanics are excellent for a guy that hasn't even started his senior campaign, arm strength is awesome -- he can really throw the deep ball, accuracy is amazing, he moves around in the pocket really well, and takes snaps from under center which is rare of a HS QB. Sets his feet before he throws, quick release. Not many things not to love about this kid.
I wasn't making a comment on how impressive or unimpressive I think Hendrix is. I'm just saying that he has an impressive offer list. A lot of top tier programs know about him and obviously think he has the talent. So he wouldn't be a "diamond in the rough".
Well we've offered quite a few QBs. Is he in the Heaps or Scroggins level?
Posted via VolNation Mobile
Right. And i said if I gave a damn about his offers I wouldn't have said what I said. All square my man just delving for info. Offers, stars, escalades...all relative to a gent like me.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
Well we've offered quite a few QBs. Is he in the Heaps or Scroggins level?
Posted via VolNation Mobile
I have him right below Scroggins on my list, but I like him better than I like Blake Bell by far. He's 6'3, 220 and runs a 4.7 40. He's faster than Scroggins. I think he fits our offense better than either Heaps or Scroggins for whatever that's worth, but they may be the better prospects.
:no:
:jawdrop:
I have him right below Scroggins on my list, but I like him better than I like Blake Bell by far. He's 6'3, 220 and runs a 4.7 40. He's faster than Scroggins. I think he fits our offense better than either Heaps or Scroggins for whatever that's worth, but they may be the better prospects.
And tell me how Heaps or Scroggins fits Kiffin's offense better than a guy that is 6'3" 220lbs and runs a faster 40 than Scroggins.
I'll be waiting.
I agree. His tape is very impressive. I like him more than I like Austin Hinder. The only guys that I see that are options for us that are better or better suited for this offense are Heaps and Scroggins. I put Hendrix right behind those two. It's really hard to watch his video and not come away thinking "this guy could really play at this level."
I have him right below Scroggins on my list, but I like him better than I like Blake Bell by far. He's 6'3, 220 and runs a 4.7 40. He's faster than Scroggins. I think he fits our offense better than either Heaps or Scroggins for whatever that's worth, but they may be the better prospects.
They are better QBs, plain and simple. It doesn't matter if Hendrix is "perfect size" for the system if he can't perform in it. Hendrix threw 11 TDs and 7 INTs. Scroggins threw 23 TDs and 10 INTs and also has won 2 Combine MVPs this Spring. Heaps threw 31 TDs and 7 INTs as a sophmore and 38 TDs and only 4 INTs as a junior. Those numbers are sick. He is also undefeated as a starter with 2 state championships. Maybe I'm putting too much stock into what these 3 players have actually done of the field...
Heaps prolly plays against the weakest competition and Scroggins plays against the best out in Cali. The competition that Hendrix plays against in Ohio is very good. None of the 3 play against rejects though...
Not trying be a smarty pants but you have contradicting statements here or did I read them wrong?
I can be a spelling Nazi too.They are better QBs, plain and simple. It doesn't matter if Hendrix is "perfect size" for the system if he can't perform in it. Hendrix threw 11 TDs and 7 INTs. Scroggins threw 23 TDs and 10 INTs and also has won 2 Combine MVPs this Spring. Heaps threw 31 TDs and 7 INTs as a sophmore and 38 TDs and only 4 INTs as a junior. Those numbers are sick. He is also undefeated as a starter with 2 state championships. Maybe I'm putting too much stock into what these 3 players have actually done of the field...
Heaps prolly plays against the weakest competition and Scroggins plays against the best out in Cali. The competition that Hendrix plays against in Ohio is very good. None of the 3 play against rejects though...
Well said. That was kinda what I was referring to above.There are many other factors you aren't considering about their statistics.
For instance, what type of offense each is playing in. The offense at Hendrix's high school is very run oriented. Hence he only threw for 1700 yards, 11 TD's, and 7 INT.
Or perhaps he didn't have a QB coach that was able to develop his talent, or an OC that properly utilized his talents. Way too many variables.
I trust the coaches' evaluations since they have seen his tape, seen him in person, and taped and reviewed their own footage. I think they trust Hendrix enough to be their #1 guy since they've already offered him.
I've always assumed he was in a run heavy system with those kind of numbers. The thing that really gets me is his TD to INT ratio. 7 INTs is alot of INTs when you've only threw 11 TDs. His decision making is what is worrying me...