'12 TN OL Brandon Hill

#127
#127
skeeter33418 said:
im not sure. the way i understand it is like this. he was told he could get his shot along the oline but could be moved to dline if coaches felt that was best for the team.
Click to expand...

I love the ignore button. But, I have no problem proving that I'm right also.:)
 
#129
#129
You love the ignore button so much you read my post even though it wasn't quoted?

Hill will be an O-lineman and is being recruited as such. I don't care what Skeeter has to say about it.
 
#130
#130
How were we not on this guy sooner?? This guy would be the perfect book end with Tiny at the other OT spot in a couple of years! He looks like "Alvin Mack" from the movie The Program.
 
#132
#132
Sabanocchio said:
You love the ignore button so much you read my post even though it wasn't quoted?

Hill will be an O-lineman and is being recruited as such. I don't care what Skeeter has to say about it.
Click to expand...

U mad?
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#133
#133
Sab, I don't have to read your posts because there's nothing you have to say that is important for me. I don't see you as a source of useful info. You always come in behind me and post and it's usually opposite of what I say. That's why I said what I said. You've never agreed with anything I've ever posted anyway. Your on my ignore list and if someone quotes you then I'll see it, but it's not that important to me. Maybe others see you as the man, but I'm fine without your commits about me or any recruits. God bless you though.
 
#134
#134
Sab, I thought you was one of those Team Skeeter dudes. But you say you don't care what he says above. Kind of contradicting don't you think? It's all good though do you, and I'll keep it moving over here too.
 
#135
#135
MiramarVol said:
Sab, I don't have to read your posts because there's nothing you have to say that is important for me. I don't see you as a source of useful info. You always come in behind me and post and it's usually opposite of what I say. That's why I said what I said. You've never agreed with anything I've ever posted anyway. Your on my ignore list and if someone quotes you then I'll see it, but it's not that important to me. Maybe others see you as the man, but I'm fine without your commits about me or any recruits. God bless you though.
Click to expand...

No one is quoting his stuff and you are still responding. You're coming across as a child. Pull whatever's out of your ass and move on.
 
#136
#136
Look up 3-4 post. There you'll see ACVol3 quoting him. Stay out of grown folks conversation if it doesn't concern you. Fluff
 
#140
#140
MiramarVol said:
Sab, I thought you was one of those Team Skeeter dudes. But you say you don't care what he says above. Kind of contradicting don't you think? It's all good though do you, and I'll keep it moving over here too.
Click to expand...
There is no thought at all of playing Hill on the defensive line. If skeeter is saying that, it's his thought not the coaches'. That's all I'm saying.
 
#141
#141
Sabanocchio said:
There is no thought at all of playing Hill on the defensive line. If skeeter is saying that, it's his thought not the coaches'. That's all I'm saying.
Click to expand...

Some of these arguments I understand. This one I don't. All that matters is where the coaches will give a guy the first shot. The consensus here is that that's OL. If he doesn't see the field and they think he would elsewhere, then they'll move him. But that's way too far down the road to be worrying about. Remember all the "Clear will get his shot at TE but will really be an OT" stuff? Now everybody's talking about how great he looks at TE. If he'd looked poor, then we could start talking about moving him to OL, but when we were recruiting it, "first look at TE" is the important part. For Hill, it's "first look at OL." Who knows what happens after he's hear a couple years.
 
#143
#143
Incipient said:
Some of these arguments I understand. This one I don't. All that matters is where the coaches will give a guy the first shot. The consensus here is that that's OL. If he doesn't see the field and they think he would elsewhere, then they'll move him. But that's way too far down the road to be worrying about. Remember all the "Clear will get his shot at TE but will really be an OT" stuff? Now everybody's talking about how great he looks at TE. If he'd looked poor, then we could start talking about moving him to OL, but when we were recruiting it, "first look at TE" is the important part. For Hill, it's "first look at OL." Who knows what happens after he's hear a couple years.
Click to expand...
Incipent, it's not even that. This guy is not a DT. He will never play the position. His skill set doesn't fit it and it no one is recruiting him for it. I'm not saying this just to contradict anyone. It's what I've been told by someone very close to the situation and the coaching staff.

I'd love to hear GoVols2003 chime in here. He's one of the many I trust on this.

People are running with this defensive idea based on one comment that skeeter made. I have news for you, skeeter posts opinions just like the rest of us. That is his opinion and it's not reflected by our coaches.
 
#144
#144
Sabanocchio said:
Incipent, it's not even that. This guy is not a DT. He will never play the position. His skill set doesn't fit it and it no one is recruiting him for it. I'm not saying this just to contradict anyone. It's what I've been told by someone very close to the situation and the coaching staff.

I'd love to hear GoVols2003 chime in here. He's one of the many I trust on this.
Click to expand...

I certainly understand why we wouldn't be looking at him for defense, I just don't get why people are making a big argument about it. If everyone agrees that he's coming in with a shot at OL, does it really matter whether or not you think he might move to defense somewhere down the road?
 
#145
#145
Incipient said:
I certainly understand why we wouldn't be looking at him for defense, I just don't get why people are making a big argument about it. If everyone agrees that he's coming in with a shot at OL, does it really matter whether or not you think he might move to defense somewhere down the road?
Click to expand...

I don't know either. I just relay what I've been told.
 
#146
#146
The argument can go on forever with Hill. There's a lot of if's, that's for sure. Recruits are told they'll play a position then get here and get moved all the time. Some here say Bowles will be a DB, some say not. Same for Hill moving to DL. People talk like Hill is committed here. It boils down to the current needs. Hood was OL now he's DL. Al Wilson, started at S, even Neal is being moved now. It happens all the time. Skill sets can be taught and developed. Some people say one recruit will move but don't think another will, needs to be more open minded. It's needs of the team. Team first. Bowles, Hill, Neal, Hood, or anyone else isn't exempt.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#148
#148
MiramarVol said:
The argument can go on forever with Hill. There's a lot of if's, that's for sure. Recruits are told they'll play a position then get here and get moved all the time. Some here say Bowles will be a DB, some say not. Same for Hill moving to DL. People talk like Hill is committed here. It boils down to the current needs. Hood was OL now he's DL. Al Wilson, started at S, even Neal is being moved now. It happens all the time. Skill sets can be taught and developed. Some people say one recruit will move but don't think another will, needs to be more open minded. It's needs of the team. Team first. Bowles, Hill, Neal, Hood, or anyone else isn't exempt.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
Click to expand...

Agreed, it happens all the time. To look at Al Wilson I just can't see him playing Safety.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top