UT = Checkmate
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 21, 2010
- Messages
- 4,048
- Likes
- 4,533
Like I said though, how did people come to the conclusion he was saying all that from that one tweet? Now I'm not a big tweeter, but that could be taken many different ways.
And let me make sure I'm understanding you, you are saying this tweet...
"he need to stay with you big bra y'all gone be real"
...means he is saying screw UT and that Ford needs to stay with Vandy?
In the latest update of Scout's "Commitment Tracker" (sometime yesterday) one of the two analysts FOLLOWING Morris changed his prediction from UCLA to Tennessee.
I think people don't like him telling a recruit that we've offered that he should stay with Vandy. That's undermining the coaching staff, which comes across as at least slightly off putting. What are your thoughts?
Honestly, I think the national and regional recruiting analysts know less about a recruit's potential destination than the site writers do.
Ex.- I would take Hubbs or Callahan's word over Farrell or Simmons anyday.
Or we can just get Lawson?
I don't see the point in offering someone as a package deal if the staff doesn't think he is worth the offer. I think it is safe to say that with only a week until NSD Harris isn't a high priority for this staff (or even the last staff).
I don't want someone that quits their commitments. If you leave when it gets tough, then you're a quitter. I played on a 2-8 football team and barely played because I am massively undersized for tackle. Quitters never win.
3 out of 8 guys have him to Tennessee in Rivals' Commitment predictions
Rivals.com Football Recruiting - NSD 2013 Rivals250 Commitment Predictions