Adam Sandler
No Colonel Sanders, you’re wrong!
- Joined
- Apr 7, 2009
- Messages
- 12,042
- Likes
- 29,893
I like this guy as an all around overall player, but i don't see something that is definitely more special about him than other prospects. Love to have him if we had a dependable oline. But olines make the rb in most cases and don't see how this kid would be utilized for success unless we fix that.
Much hate for Love on this board, I sense...
![]()
No hate, I think a lot see his size being a problem for him in this conference. I think love ends up playing a scat back or as a slot guy, I see a guy like Vaughn adding depth behind Hurd and or Kamara, whereas Love fills the role of pig, and I could be completely wrong but jmo
By all accounts from people who would know, Love is up to 190 lbs, and somewhere between 5'10" & 5'11".
He hasn't stepped foot on a college campus yet.
Seems like pretty good size to me, considering his ridiculous track speed?
[/B]
So we shouldn't recruit any running backs until the o-line is fixed? Im guessing CBJ is planning on fixing it.
Either one, IMHO, but I do like Love's tape a bit better. His speed sets him apart, but Vaughn has come on strong, lately, and I think has the frame to develop in a Melvin Gordon type of player. Not a scat back. Not your classic power back, either. But somewhere in between.
He's not there yet, but a few years in the S&C program here, and he'd look like Rajion Neal or Montario Hardesty.
I was talking about size, not career yardage/production...although both RB's made it to the league.I agree on Gordon which is why I said Big10 but ppl tk that as a negative. Btw Neal and Montario aren't nearly on the same planet as Gordon