Really hope we get this guy. I think he's best suited to play OG but that doesn't make him any less of a need. You win in the trenches and we need as many quality lineman as we can get. Just look at who Alabama has committed as just OGs, like 3 of the top 10 alone. We definitely need OTs but we need OGs as well. My dream finish would be to land Burrell, Richmond, and one more OT. We need O-lineman more than any other position right now, take whoever we can and let the numbers work themselves out. We can afford to lose some guys at other positions but we can't afford to miss altogether on the O-line.
This is terrible analysis. If you want to debate whether Burrell is a OG or an OT at the next level, that is a good question. There is a lot of interesting debate about that aspect. Burrell displays amazing feet and quickness, but he plays OG in HS, he isn't as tall and as long armed as the prototypical OT"s are, but he shows very good athleticism and skill that does make many wonder if he could in fact be a very good RT....
If you believe he is an OG, all the way, which you have stated, then we do not need another OG....and OG is not a problem on the current roster, nor is it a position of need in this class.
Zach Stewart is one hell of an OG prospect. Venzelle Boulware is one hell of an OG prospect. Jack Jones like Burrell could be a great OG prospect but is intriguing and athletic enough on film to make you think he could be a very good RT as well. Same goes for Chance Hall. He at the very least will be a good OG prospect, but has the frame and feet that projects nicely to an OT.
Lets also talk about the current roster. We currently have Jashon Robertson, Marcus Jackson for another year, Dylan Weisman, Austin Sanders, Kyler Kerbyson that are all OG's. We have many reports that say Charles Mosely will end up being a very good OG. We also have reports saying Mike Sawyers may end up at OG as well, if he doesn't improve at DT. So again, that puts us at 10-12 OG types on the roster next year...... It boggles my mind that because we have had some O-line issues this year, that taking another OG is going to somehow address the current issue for the future. I can assure you, our OG play has not been the issue....having OG's, walk-on's and true freshman that are suited for C and OG that are playing OT is the problem.
No way we take another OG prospect if that is what our staff believes he projects at. I believe that Burrell is a very good RT prospect, and if our coaches believe that which i'm pretty sure they do, then yes you take him and don't bat an eye. If you think any player left on our board no matter their "ranking" at OG is a take for us still, you are freaking crazy.