CrunchingTheVolz
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 6, 2016
- Messages
- 5,144
- Likes
- 2,854
Why is that such a lol? Just stay at 85 and build your classes. I don't see the issue. That is the way it used to be.
Imagine a new coach being hired like Butch was. Needs to flip the roster, but has no class signing limits.
He proceeds to give 44 kids on the roster their walking papers plus there were 15 SRs.
He's signing 59-60 kids in this class. And there are a bunch of New coaches hired throughout the NCAA and a lot of them have the same plan.
It would be a disaster.
Why is that such a lol? Just stay at 85 and build your classes. I don't see the issue. That is the way it used to be.
The system is in a good spot right now and it's better than it was in the past, IMO. Penalties for oversigning are now in place. Backcounting is there to help with schools who are rebuilding or planing ahead. SEC has it's own limit. Most schools operate under an annual scholarship plan meaning the coach ultimately has the authority to renew or to not renew the student athletes scholarship. So without the limit on class size you'd be looking at some ugly scenarios, like a coach signing 40 only to renew 25 of the scholarships after a year. This is why the Houston Nutt rule happened and the SEC put a limit on counters for each class.
My point is Nutt was the only one really. Think of how a coach would look if he did something drastic? The negative media of today would destroy him and no one would want to go there.