19 students, 3 adults dead in Texas elementary shooting.

#3,826
#3,826
utvolpj said:
Of course it's true. You have no clue where that ballot is sent, who fills it out, or who turns it in. People were receiving extra ballots addressed to past residents all over the country.

If you think that the massive mail out of unrequested ballots is as secure as in person then you're nuts
Click to expand...
That is just wrong.

New study finds voting by mail does not increase risk of voting fraud

Mail-in voting fraud: It's nearly impossible

How Associating Mail-in Ballots with Voter Fraud Became a Political Tool

Does mail-in voting lead to fraud – and does it help Democrats? The facts

How does vote-by-mail work and does it increase election fraud?
 
#3,827
#3,827
 
  • Like
Reactions: mr.checkerboards, marcusluvsvols and davethevol
#3,828
#3,828
508mikey said:
All those millions of mail ins just happened to arrive the night of the election Really ? The USPS couldn't do that if it took 10 years
Click to expand...
I'm not going to address an unsourced claim. I just posted 5 links to 5 different sources which support my contention that mail-in voting does not lead to an increase in voting fraud. Nobody else has linked jack $hit. That is usually how it happens too. You guys run your ignorant mouths ... while I use sourced information to support what I'm saying, including data.
 
#3,829
#3,829
The Constitution sets a requirement for voting DAY (the Tuesday next after the first Monday in the month of November). Note, not voting WEEK, not voting MONTH, voting DAY.
I support allowing mail in ballots for military personnel serving overseas and I might could support allowing people with a valid excuse to show up IN PERSON at a courthouse to cast a vote in the presence of a notary public in the seven days before election, but otherwise, vote IN PERSON on the constitutionally prescribed date or don’t vote at all. Fraud is easier than you think. It is not the governments job to hold your hand in voting.
 
  • Like
Reactions: marcusluvsvols, Sudden Impact and 508mikey
#3,830
#3,830
BowlBrother85 said:
I'm not going to address an unsourced claim. I just posted 5 links to 5 different sources which support my contention that mail-in voting does not lead to an increase in voting fraud. Nobody else has linked jack $hit. That is usually how it happens too. You guys run your ignorant mouths ... while I use sourced information to support what I'm saying, including data.
Click to expand...
“Sourced” 😂
PBS, the Guardian, Brookings? Why not just quote the DNC while you are at it? (Check NPR and MSNBC too, I am sure they can help you out too)
 
  • Like
Reactions: marcusluvsvols and rekinhavoc
#3,831
#3,831
OrangeTsar said:
“Sourced” 😂
PBS, the Guardian, Brookings? Why not just quote the DNC while you are at it? (Check NPR and MSNBC too, I am sure they can help you out too)
Click to expand...
Yes, Brookings... is a strong source. I don't believe that you even know who they are, if you are questioning them.
 
#3,833
#3,833
Dude…/PBS is the VERY FIRST thing I mentioned. Do you even ATTEMPT reading ? Hard to take you seriously when you miss stuff like that
 
#3,835
#3,835
508mikey said:
All those millions of mail ins just happened to arrive the night of the election Really ? The USPS couldn't do that if it took 10 years
Click to expand...
Most of the controversial states the law was no counting mail in until you count in person. So the votes didn't come in on election night. They were legally not allowed to be counted until then. It's also why numerous journalists predicted this. Predicted trump going to bed up big and then waking up behind.
 
#3,836
#3,836
OrangeTsar said:
The Constitution sets a requirement for voting DAY (the Tuesday next after the first Monday in the month of November). Note, not voting WEEK, not voting MONTH, voting DAY.
I support allowing mail in ballots for military personnel serving overseas and I might could support allowing people with a valid excuse to show up IN PERSON at a courthouse to cast a vote in the presence of a notary public in the seven days before election, but otherwise, vote IN PERSON on the constitutionally prescribed date or don’t vote at all. Fraud is easier than you think. It is not the governments job to hold your hand in voting.
Click to expand...
The argument that I'm making concerns whether or not mail-in voting leads to an increase in voting fraud. It does not.
 
#3,837
#3,837
OrangeTsar said:
Dude…/PBS is the VERY FIRST thing I mentioned. Do you even ATTEMPT reading ? Hard to take you seriously when you miss stuff like that
Click to expand...
If you are suggesting that PBS.org is biased, then you are an idiot. And where are your links, Wise A$$? Why am I always the only one providing sources in support of my arguments?
 
#3,838
#3,838
BowlBrother85 said:
If you are suggesting that PBS.org is biased, than you are an idiot. And where are your links, Wise A$$? Why am I always the only one providing sources in support of my arguments?
Click to expand...
You said I didn’t mention PBS when I mentioned PBS. Quit changing the subject to hide your failure in basic debate 😂
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rickyvol77
#3,839
#3,839
BowlBrother85 said:
That is just wrong.

New study finds voting by mail does not increase risk of voting fraud

Mail-in voting fraud: It's nearly impossible

How Associating Mail-in Ballots with Voter Fraud Became a Political Tool

Does mail-in voting lead to fraud – and does it help Democrats? The facts

How does vote-by-mail work and does it increase election fraud?
Click to expand...

Every one of your links is basically propaganda. The first is a study on the threat tree to mail in voting (concentrating mainly on traditional absentee ballots) and doesn't take into account out of date voter rolls. All of the other links are attempts to confuse traditional absentee ballots with the unsolicited vote by mail many states adopted during the pandemic. Again none addressed out of date voter registration rolls or how returned ballots were verified.
 
#3,841
#3,841
hog88 said:
Every one of your links is basically propaganda. The first is a study on the threat tree to mail in voting (concentrating mainly on traditional absentee ballots) and doesn't take into account out of date voter rolls. All of the other links are attempts to confuse traditional absentee ballots with the unsolicited vote by mail many states adopted during the pandemic. Again none addressed out of date voter registration rolls or how returned ballots were verified.
Click to expand...
That is not true. The information provided is factual. And where are your sources? Why am I always the only one linking sources here?
 
#3,842
#3,842
BowlBrother85 said:
If you are suggesting that PBS.org is biased, then you are an idiot. And where are your links, Wise A$$? Why am I always the only one providing sources in support of my arguments?
Click to expand...
PBS is 100 biased. They are funded by the regime. I trust them about as much as I would Goebbels defending the Reich 😂
Every „source“ you provide is beholden to if not under the direct control of the establishment. Love how they all quote the now ubiquitous „experts“ 😂😂😂😂
 
#3,844
#3,844
hog88 said:
Every one of your links is basically propaganda. The first is a study on the threat tree to mail in voting (concentrating mainly on traditional absentee ballots) and doesn't take into account out of date voter rolls. All of the other links are attempts to confuse traditional absentee ballots with the unsolicited vote by mail many states adopted during the pandemic. Again none addressed out of date voter registration rolls or how returned ballots were verified.
Click to expand...
But but „experts“ 😉
 
#3,845
#3,845
BowlBrother85 said:
That is just wrong.

New study finds voting by mail does not increase risk of voting fraud

Mail-in voting fraud: It's nearly impossible

How Associating Mail-in Ballots with Voter Fraud Became a Political Tool

Does mail-in voting lead to fraud – and does it help Democrats? The facts

How does vote-by-mail work and does it increase election fraud?
Click to expand...
You didn't read your links. The titles aren't really the same as the findings. The language used by those discussing then is also telling. But hey, keep believing that it's more secure. It's impossible unless you believe the machines can get hacked. Even your first link said they identified 30 new threats to voting by mail. The second link just moved on to the disenfranchisement argument
 
  • Like
Reactions: mr.checkerboards, Rickyvol77, MemphisVol77 and 2 others
#3,847
#3,847
hog88 said:
Every one of your links is basically propaganda. The first is a study on the threat tree to mail in voting (concentrating mainly on traditional absentee ballots) and doesn't take into account out of date voter rolls. All of the other links are attempts to confuse traditional absentee ballots with the unsolicited vote by mail many states adopted during the pandemic. Again none addressed out of date voter registration rolls or how returned ballots were verified.
Click to expand...
I have over 50 sources, which support what I'm saying.

US election 2020: Do postal ballots lead to voting fraud?
 
#3,848
#3,848
utvolpj said:
You didn't read your links. The titles aren't really the same as the findings. The language used by those discussing then is also telling. But hey, keep believing that it's more secure. It's impossible unless you believe the machines can get hacked. Even your first link said they identified 30 new threats to voting by mail. The second link just moved on to the disenfranchisement argument
Click to expand...
I did read the links... and it carefully weighs both sides of the argument. There is not an added risk of mail-in voting and that is the determination made by those sources. You are profoundly ignorant.
 
#3,849
#3,849
  • Like
Reactions: Rickyvol77, marcusluvsvols and davethevol
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top