#2 goes down. Bama/LSU rematch??

[rjd970]

I don't know about this one. I think Oregon gives Alabama a better game than they did LSU.

Alabama has showed time and again they stuff the spread. Not so sure this would be a close game.

 

[UTVolunteer247]

Alabama has no O - Oregon could jump them with a route vs USC -

oregon has no D

 

[Tux]

I don't know about this one. I think Oregon gives Alabama a better game than they did LSU.

Oregon would struggle to move the ball on Bama and Bama would run rough shod over the Oregon defense.

 

[Vol423]

#2 in the nation my a$$!!! This just goes to prove what a joke the Big 12 is.

 

[MaehlMan]

oregon has no D

Lol

 

[Vol423]

Like I said, if we wouldn't have given the ball to them four times, it would have been a different game.

I'd probably pick them to beat us again, but I do think that it would be a great game.

It's definitely a tough argument, and all the more reason why the BCS needs to be demolished.

LSU and Alabama would BOTH beat the **** out of Oregon.

 

[pualsline]

please don't let Bama in the NC...oh please

 

[tim]

Like I said, if we wouldn't have given the ball to them four times, it would have been a different game.

I'd probably pick them to beat us again, but I do think that it would be a great game.

It's definitely a tough argument, and all the more reason why the BCS needs to be demolished.

LSU has a tendency to "take" the ball away. Nevertheless, I'm pulling for you guys.

 

[Stupified]

Surely this year has to be the straw that breaks the camels back? No way this cluster**** of a BCS season finale can conclude without deciding to implement a playoff system in the future.

 

[rjd970]

please don't let Bama in the NC...oh please

If it is between Bama and a conference champion OK, it should be OK no question. Both lost at home, but OK won its conference.

That Texas Tech loss though. Geez.

 

[MaehlMan]

LSU has a tendency to "take" the ball away. Nevertheless, I'm pulling for you guys.

Gracias. Hopefully it works out in our favor, although I guess the Rose Bowl wouldn't suck too much.

 

[milohimself]

BCS honks brains asplode

 

[tim]

Alabama has showed time and again they stuff the spread. Not so sure this would be a close game.

. 4th quarter game IMO.

 

[Eberry]

Bama LSU wont happen.. 2nd place automatically goes to sugarbowl.. Oregon or OU will play for title.. Sorry to burst y'alls bubble but LSUBAMA wont happen for title..

 

[milohimself]

Tonight's game just cemented a Bama-LSU rematch for the national title

 

[TrueOrange]

Surely this year has to be the straw that breaks the camels back? No way this cluster**** of a BCS season finale can conclude without deciding to implement a playoff system in the future.

From a similar one

No it really wouldn't...and even if the system were to fall apart because of it we'd more than likely just see it go back to "the bowls can invite whoever they want" where you get situations like #1 Michigan and #2 Tennessee in separate bowls.

 

[tim]

Bama LSU wont happen.. 2nd place automatically goes to sugarbowl.. Oregon or OU will play for title.. Sorry to burst y'alls bubble but LSUBAMA wont happen for title..

Tonight's game just cemented a Bama-LSU rematch for the national title

Debate.

 

[TrueOrange]

Bama LSU wont happen.. 2nd place automatically goes to sugarbowl.. Oregon or OU will play for title.. Sorry to burst y'alls bubble but LSUBAMA wont happen for title..

Unless they're #2 overall. That supersedes it...so that someone has to go to the sugar bowl argument...yeah no

 

[milohimself]

Bama LSU wont happen.. 2nd place automatically goes to sugarbowl.. Oregon or OU will play for title.. Sorry to burst y'alls bubble but LSUBAMA wont happen for title..

Yes it will. The gap in last week's BCS rankings between LSU/Okie Lite/Bama and everyone else is enormous, and won't be getting any smaller with Bama having the Iron Bowl left (the computers have Auburn ranked like 20th or something ridiculous).

 

[milohimself]

Unless they're #2 overall. That supersedes it...so that someone has to go to the sugar bowl argument...yeah no

Also spaced on debunking that piece of crap. The only team the Sugar Bowl HAS to take is the SEC champion if they are not playing for the BCS championship.

 

[rjd970]

Unless they're #2 overall. That supersedes it...so that someone has to go to the sugar bowl argument...yeah no

Right. The loser of the SECCG would go to the sugar bowl. LOL.

Gotta love the BCS.

 

[Stupified]

Yes it will. The gap in last week's BCS rankings between LSU/Okie Lite/Bama and everyone else is enormous, and won't be getting any smaller with Bama having the Iron Bowl left (the computers have Auburn ranked like 20th or something ridiculous).

You don't think that those extra CGs will help out Oregon and/or Oklahoma get the jump at the end?

 

[Vol423]

If it is between Bama and a conference champion OK, it should be OK no question. Both lost at home, but OK won its conference.

That Texas Tech loss though. Geez.

Winning your conference isn't a requirement to make the national championship game. While it should be that way, it isn't. It's already happened before. Losing to Texas Tech eliminated Oklahoma from consideration.

 

[milohimself]

You don't think that those extra CGs will help out Oregon and/or Oklahoma get the jump at the end?

No, the Pac-12 south (sans USC) is terrible and the Big XII no longer has a conference championship game.

 

[MaehlMan]

You don't think that those extra CG games will help out Oregon and/or Oklahoma get the jump at the end?

Oregon has #18 USC, OSU, and (probably) ASU left.

Alabama has Ga. Southern and Auburn.

You'd think that Oregon would have the advantage there. It's just a question of how much (and also the voters, obviously, who ARE 2/3 of the equation.)