Winning your conference isn't a requirement to make the national championship game. While it should be that way, it isn't. It's already happened before. Losing to Texas Tech eliminated Oklahoma from consideration.
Yep. Go look at the BCS ranking points. Assuming Bama and LSU win out, they are now a written in ink, cemented stone cold lock to play for the BCSMNC.
The PAC-12 South, including USC, is terrible.
How does that work? Is a loss to USC not a loss? Is it like a bye week?
I'm not sure Oregon having an extra conference title game win wouldn't jump them. Unless something drastic happens, Bama will be behind a game at the end of the season. May or may not be good enough, but it is enough for an argument in the human polls.
Nobody knows. If USC were eligible, they would just about have the South locked up. Right now, UCLA, ASU and Utah are all right there and could very likely all finish 5-4, each one having beat the other. ASU beat Utah, UCLA beat ASU, and Utah beat UCLA.MILO, who is the possible opponent if OU makes it to the conference championship game?
When that extra conference game is against an unranked team who is 5-4 in the Pac-12 south, I don't think it's going to bolster them any.I'm not sure Oregon having an extra conference title game win wouldn't jump them. Unless something drastic happens, Bama will be behind a game at the end of the season. May or may not be good enough, but it is enough for an argument in the human polls.
Your strength of schedule drops every time USC beats a team in your conference/that you play would essentially be my guess.
That and beating USC essentially has the value of a W, but maybe (possibly?) as much as even a midmajor or an FCS rather than the 8-2 team they actually played.
Speculative on my part though