2 spread option team playing at Atlanata right now for the SEC title

#26
#26
Alabama has won 3 of the last 4 national championships by running a more pro style offense.

You won't beat Bama running a pro-style offense. The spread is great for teams with lesser talent and allow you to out scheme defenses if you have the right pieces.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#29
#29
It's not a finesse offense by any means. Auburn averages 300+ yards rushing a game. We didn't get the yards not because of the offense but because we didn't execute. Hell Florida picked up many short yard plays in their championship years with the spread. It's a finesse offense if you have a finesse mentality.

Nebraska proved we were a finesse offense in 97. Too bad we were running the spread with Peyton Manning and Jamal Lewis that year.
 
#30
#30
So? Two spread teams beat them in the regular season while Alabama laughs at them with all of their titles.



And Auburn may have a chance at a 2nd one in the last 4 years with a spread offense.
You have no point and are unable to understand the basic point that Auburn, A & M, and any other SEC team or ncaa team is going to come in and pro style Bama around the field and beat Saban at his own game with the best players in the country.
That's like a boxer trying to take a jiujitsu guy to the ground. Stupid. You like your bama boys. Go hang out with them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#36
#36
Auburn ran for 296 yards against Bama. Let me know the last time a pro style team rushed for over 200 on them. Or, let me know the college team that can run right at them and rush for 150. Just one.
 
#37
#37
an inferior talented team cannot shove a bigger and more athletic team around, but they can make them play the whole field on d in a spread type offense and win games that were years ago not winnable by playing standard offensive sets.
Just so happens the Bama dynasty has been beaten twice in the last few years. Both by spread teams with qb's that can run.

I like to compare it martial arts. There are many many different fighting styles. Kung Fu, Karate, Tai Chi, Judo, Muay Thai, etc. No one style definitively is superior than the other. It all comes down to the person executing that style VS another person executing their style. Ultimately it isn't the style that wins out. It's the proficiency and capability of the fighter executing it!
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#38
#38
Auburn ran for 296 yards against Bama. Let me know the last time a pro style team rushed for over 200 on them. Or, let me know the college team that can run right at them and rush for 150. Just one.

Maybe they didn't have to RUN? Are you an Auburn fan? I thought we were talking about Pro-Style against Spreads. Not specifically Auburn vs Bama.

What happens when all the Pro-Style teams implement the spread offense? What's the reason why a team wins or lose then?
 
#39
#39
Still couldn't get the tough yards against Vandy...

It its a finesse offense. Period. Imagine this scenario: 4TH AND GOAL from the 2 yard line and your offense goes 4 wide?

Ridiculous

Tebow called and said it works well in college.
 
#41
#41
I like to compare it martial arts. There are many many different fighting styles. Kung Fu, Karate, Tai Chi, Judo, Muay Thai, etc. No one style definitively is superior than the other. It all comes down to the person executing that style VS another person executing their style. Ultimately it isn't the style that wins out. It's the proficiency and capability of the fighter executing it!


Yes, but if you know your opponents strength, its oftentimes smarter to not challenge it and try to exploit their weakness and build your strength around your main opponents weakness.
 
#42
#42
Maybe they didn't have to RUN? Are you an Auburn fan? I thought we were talking about Pro-Style against Spreads. Not specifically Auburn vs Bama.

What happens when all the Pro-Style teams implement the spread offense? What's the reason why a team wins or lose then?

I don't mind Auburn. Lots of kids of my friends go there or have gone to Auburn.
I'm just using Auburn as an example. The spread keeps a lot of teams in games when they normally wouldn't be.
 
#43
#43
Yes, but if you know your opponents strength, its oftentimes smarter to not challenge it and try to exploit their weakness and build your strength around your main opponents weakness.

Well yeah of course. Getting back to football that's exactly what coordinators are paid to do. However I just don't buy into the notion that one STYLE is inherently superior to the other.
 
#44
#44
Well yeah of course. Getting back to football that's exactly what coordinators are paid to do. However I just don't buy into the notion that one STYLE is inherently superior to the other.


I think it's more of not banging your head and trying to out prostyle the best coach with the best players, and if you can beat Bama/Saban, you will play for championships.
 
#46
#46
Alabama scores 28 points in 4 quarters. Missiouri scores 20 points in 2 quarters.

Clearly the pro style is far better than the spread.
 
#48
#48
Alabama scores 28 points in 4 quarters. Missiouri scores 20 points in 2 quarters.

Clearly the pro style is far better than the spread.

Pssst..... 7 came from a fumble return for a TD.
 

VN Store



Back
Top