That line of thinking is the problem with this place.....year 1 you need to have a better record than the guy before you was in year 3.....having basically the players.....I say they need complete better....show improvement in performance and a 6-6 record for year 1 will not get him fired...which is just stupid to say....canned after 1 year...with an even record..just stupid.
Idiotic? Three years ago while people were loving on Dooley I predicted he would need to prove himself by year 3 or he'd be gone. Some thought that was "idiotic" too because of the condition of the program when he arrived.
You do have to have a better record but not for just one year. IF Jones can't take the roster that he inherits with experience in many key positions then he is VERY unlikely to follow that up with better records in year 2 or 3 with a MUCH younger team.
Speaking of "idiotic"... I didn't say he should be canned after one year. I said that Hart better update his list if he doesn't show he can coach this year. Here's why:
Year 1- 6-6 with an experienced team and one of the best OL's in the country.
Year 2- worse record with youth everywhere.
Year 3- Negavols and the media on the warpath declaring the Jones experiment a failure and demanding that he have a better record than year one with a roster that is NOT likely to be better or more experienced.
Conversely...
Year 1- 8 wins and the recruiting credibilty that brings
Year 2- 6-8 wins as young guys get experience with LOTS of talented Freshmen playing
Year 3- 9-11 wins and the house righted.
ANY coach UT hires is going to have to outcoach whoever is coaching at Bama, UGA, UF, LSU, et al. Those states are going to have more instate talent for the foreseeable future. If you want players to leave those states for K'ville... then the perception has to be that UT has an elite coach.