2020 Presidential Race

Hah. Wrong. Its 100% FACT. Again, Math is the enemy of the left.

Are there more Whites below the poverty line that blacks in those states? No. Not really. Lets take Mississippi. Mississippi is the poorest state in the Union if we ignore Puerto Rico (which we should).
3,000,000 people. 59% White. 38% White. All other races under 1% so lets ignore them.
1,770,000 Whites. 1,140,000 Blacks.
Poverty rate:
Blacks 31.3% -353,4000
Whites 12.1% - 214,170
Mississippi Population 2020 (Demographics, Maps, Graphs)
Mississippi Report - 2018 - Talk Poverty

The poverty rates don't change too much state to state when they are saturated in diversity. In the end there is around 17 million Whites below poverty nation wide. Blacks and hispanics are lower number wise but higher per capita but when combined outnumber Whites. If you adjust those numbers for the way most races vote politically, well, you're going to find that democrats are more poor. They are also less educated. Hate to blow up the myths you've been believing from facebook and CNN.

Just kidding, I'm not.

Ratios and percentages are only allowed when its in their favor. This isn’t your first rodeo.

Now you‘re a racist.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DC_Vol and FLVOL_79
That isn’t relevant to his original post or his new fabrication.

First he was saying democrats are poor and can’t pay the bills and that the white folks who vote republican in those poor states aren’t poor. How is this supported by relative per capita poverty levels? It’s not.

Now, he claims he was explaining why those states are poor (lol). But even he admits per capita measures don’t have any relevance to that.

You guys can’t even keep your own ******** straight.
Democrats are poor and cant pay their Bill's. That's why they cry about debt forgiveness. It's literally one of your parties main stances. Oh yeah, miniumin wage increase as well....oops
 
... and isn't it also correct, that Donald Trump's largest constituency of voters are white men, over 40 and without a college degree? I'm pretty sure that is true. I've read that in several different places.
Really? Link with peer reviewed scientific data?
 
  • Like
Reactions: NEO
Ha. Your pseudo lawyer double speak doesnt work here. Nice try though. Like I said, heal up.
“I’d wager a nickel” isn’t proof of anything. It’s an admission that you don’t have anything concrete that supports whatever it is you claim to be arguing.

If you had anything, you’d have posted it by now instead of floundering around trying to reframe things as per capita basis even though you admit it isn’t relevant.

That’s not “double speak” that’s you having had a chance and “I’d wager a nickel” being the best you can come up with.

@hog88 said the quiet part out loud. You were hoping that making it a black vs. white thing would get you called a racist and you could do that whole song and dance without actually addressing the colossal stupidity of what you said. Unfortunately, it was too stupid for that to work. Better luck next time.
 
“I’d wager a nickel” isn’t proof of anything. It’s an admission that you don’t have anything concrete that supports whatever it is you claim to be arguing.

If you had anything, you’d have posted it by now instead of floundering around trying to reframe things as per capita basis even though you admit it isn’t relevant.

That’s not “double speak” that’s you having had a chance and “I’d wager a nickel” being the best you can come up with.

@hog88 said the quiet part out loud. You were hoping that making it a black vs. white thing would get you called a racist and you could do that whole song and dance without actually addressing the colossal stupidity of what you said. Unfortunately, it was too stupid for that to work. Better luck next time.

Actually he did a damn good job of making you look stupider than you normally do. Spanked your ass he did.
 
Then, by all means, explain how how per capita measures of poverty support either one of his points.
I didn't read back far enough to see what his main points were, only that he stated something that made you white guilt sufferers feel uncomfortable, and I didn't see anything blatantly untrue in the few posts that I read. His math seemed to back up what I read.
 
“I’d wager a nickel” isn’t proof of anything. It’s an admission that you don’t have anything concrete that supports whatever it is you claim to be arguing.

If you had anything, you’d have posted it by now instead of floundering around trying to reframe things as per capita basis even though you admit it isn’t relevant.

That’s not “double speak” that’s you having had a chance and “I’d wager a nickel” being the best you can come up with.

@hog88 said the quiet part out loud. You were hoping that making it a black vs. white thing would get you called a racist and you could do that whole song and dance without actually addressing the colossal stupidity of what you said. Unfortunately, it was too stupid for that to work. Better luck next time.
Keep spinning your wheels.

No matter how many times you attempt to reframe my post you're still going to be wrong. I think this is the part where you are metaphorically disbarred.
 
Last edited:
I didn't read back far enough to see what his main points were, only that he stated something that made you white guilt sufferers feel uncomfortable, and I didn't see anything blatantly untrue in the few posts that I read. His math seemed to back up what I read.

What math did he do and what did it back up?
 
I didn't read back far enough to see what his main points were, only that he stated something that made you white guilt sufferers feel uncomfortable, and I didn't see anything blatantly untrue in the few posts that I read. His math seemed to back up what I read.
All I said was the poor states bowlbrother mentioned were actually quite racially diverse which led to the high levels of poverty compared to less diverse states. This started because I called Democrats poor as f### who cant pay their damn bill's which is supported by party platforms like minimum wage increases and debt fortiveness.

The "lawyer" is desperately trying to spin it into something else. He/she would probably be really good at getting crackhead to admit to crimes.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hog88
I've given you enough links to almost hang yourself. I can't be responsible for any more of your actions..out of the kindness of my heart.
None of them were relevant. If anything showed the opposite of what you were saying.

The first time or after you tried to change it to something else.
 
Make what up? There are multiple statements in my post. I said USE YOUR WORDS. Census.gov backs up every statement I mentioned though.

Here is more evidence for you:
1. Trends in party affiliation among demographic groups

Please please tell me I don't have to do the 8th grade level math for you like I do for Luther every few months.
Hah. Wrong. Its 100% FACT. Again, Math is the enemy of the left.

Are there more Whites below the poverty line that blacks in those states? No. Not really. Lets take Mississippi. Mississippi is the poorest state in the Union if we ignore Puerto Rico (which we should).
3,000,000 people. 59% White. 38% White. All other races under 1% so lets ignore them.
1,770,000 Whites. 1,140,000 Blacks.
Poverty rate:
Blacks 31.3% -353,4000
Whites 12.1% - 214,170
Mississippi Population 2020 (Demographics, Maps, Graphs)
Mississippi Report - 2018 - Talk Poverty

The poverty rates don't change too much state to state when they are saturated in diversity. In the end there is around 17 million Whites below poverty nation wide. Blacks and hispanics are lower number wise but higher per capita but when combined outnumber Whites. If you adjust those numbers for the way most races vote politically, well, you're going to find that democrats are more poor. They are also less educated. Hate to blow up the myths you've been believing from facebook and CNN.

Just kidding, I'm not.

#30,957, 959, and 975.

Ok. Which point do you think is well supported by that math?

Or you were just saying they were true statements?

I mean depending on when you joined, he was saying either
a. [pejoratively] Democrats are poor and the poorest of the poor in the poorest states aren’t the white people who vote republican.
b. “Why those states are poor” (I’m not even sure where he got this other than trying to bail out of his other argument, tbh)

What is supported is:
There are poor black people in those states.
Black people mostly vote democrat.

That doesn’t support the broad generalization. Maybe a majority of poor people vote democrat? I’m not sure that’s even been established.

I mean if I had realized he was just saying “some poor people vote democrat” I wouldn’t have been nearly as interested.

Or maybe you thought cherry picking the state with the highest (Or second highest) population of poor black people relative to whites and extrapolating it across the entire US was persuasive? I’m trying to see your side of this...
 
Last edited:

VN Store



Back
Top