2020 Presidential Race

First, I think Trump needs the House to pack the Court, but I'm not sure. Second, did i say I approved packing the Court? I think both sides are playing stupid games with the courts.

Cool..but what is Trump doing that is such an outrage? What would be the timeline that one does not get to nominate? The Dems are just bitter as Hills was a shoe-in and they passed. And yes McConnell was doing what pols do. Frankly I cannot stand the guy, he is a pol for pete's sake. Packing the courts is a totally different level.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64 and BigOrangeD
Cool..not too late for Trump to go ahead and do it now. 10,000 nominees await but then the next Dem can appoint 15,000. This the road u want?
Trump needs to hit this point hard for the next 4 weeks that Beijing Biden wants to pack the court and he won’t give any names of who he would put on the court
 
  • Like
Reactions: BigOrangeD
I hope if Joe and heels win , the left also holds both the senate and the house . That’s the fastest way to get liberals voted out of office .. give them all the power so they have nobody to blame their F’ups on .

I'm pretty sure they'll try to blame somebody, just like the Republicans would.
 
I hope if Joe and heels win , the left also holds both the senate and the house . That’s the fastest way to get liberals voted out of office .. give them all the power so they have nobody to blame their F’ups on .
You know the media would still blame the Rs and somehow even Trump
 
  • Like
Reactions: BigOrangeD
I'm pretty sure they'll try to blame somebody, just like the Republicans would.


You are correct. Both sides play the blame game. I default to giving them less say over our lives. Gov is corrupt when money is involved and aint no more money than the USA. Pretty simple to me. TBH, 2000 Joe I would not have a problem,. 2020 Joe with Harris nibbling on his ear (or vice versa), big issue to me.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: BigOrangeD
I think the Rs better start fighting by the same rules the dems do. If elected he should be impeached but I wouldn’t push for that because we don’t need a President heels up Harris any longer than we would already get when he’s eventually pushed out due to his issues.
Nah..... I agree with trump in using social media to stand up to the lefts and the media’s lies( not to the craziness trump does at times) but they need to mature and work towards the betterment of America and not just strictly try to gain power.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BigOrangeD
Cool..but what is Trump doing that is such an outrage? What would be the timeline that one does not get to nominate? The Dems are just bitter as Hills was a shoe-in and they passed. And yes McConnell was doing what pols do. Frankly I cannot stand the guy, he is a pol for pete's sake. Packing the courts is a totally different level.

According to the 2016 Republicans, the timeline for no vote was at least nine months before the election. Garland should have gotten a vote, Barrett should get a vote. That happens, we're probably not discussing more justices now.
 
Nah..... I agree with trump in using social media to stand up to the lefts and the media’s lies( not to the craziness trump does at times) but they need to mature and work towards the betterment of America and not just strictly try to gain power.

The impasse is "what is better for America"
 
Nah..... I agree with trump in using social media to stand up to the lefts and the media’s lies( not to the craziness trump does at times) but they need to mature and work towards the betterment of America and not just strictly try to gain power.
The modern dem party doesn’t want the betterment of America. There is no common ground with these people
 
  • Like
Reactions: BigOrangeD
If I may ask..how is Trump fringe? I just dont get it. What policies?

I dont know that most of Trump's internal policies are fringe but I think some of his foreign policy and rhetoric is definitely intended to appeal to a fringe base. I think the fringe aspect is more concerned with state, local, house, senate races, etc.

Edit: and that applies to both parties.
 
According to the 2016 Republicans, the timeline for no vote was at least nine months before the election. Garland should have gotten a vote, Barrett should get a vote. That happens, we're probably not discussing more justices now.

I understand. Pols gonna pol. Obviously the R's were in control of the Senate and shot down Garland or possibly anybody else. Blaming timeline occurrence is not healthy.
 
I'm for a stimulus, but targeting small businesses and trying to get it to people who actually need it (not sure how to do that though). FK the corporations. They'll just buy stock with it or give bonuses to top execs.
A lot of small businesses are corporations. Like mine.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hog88
I dont know that most of Trump's internal policies are fringe but I think some of his foreign policy and rhetoric is definitely intended to appeal to a fringe base. I think the fringe aspect is more concerned with state, local, house, senate races, etc.

Edit: and that applies to both parties.

Could u be more specific on foreign policy? Asking NATO to pay for their prior promised 2% GDP or asking China for more balanced trade. Sounds like he is standing up for our nation to me.
 
I understand. Pols gonna pol. Obviously the R's were in control of the Senate and shot down Garland or possibly anybody else. Blaming timeline occurrence is not healthy.

My understanding (I'm no legal scholar) is Garland had a fairly moderate record and it would not have been like replacing Scalia with an ultra-liberal. I suspect the Senate would only have voted on a Barrett type in 16.
 

VN Store



Back
Top