2020 Presidential Race

#56,001
#56,001
BowlBrother85 said:
Yes. I posted this earlier:

Per Politico: More than 50 former senior intelligence officials, including ex-Trump administration officials like Russ Travers, have signed on to a letter outlining their belief that the Biden e-mails saga "has all the classic earmarks of a Russian information operation."
Click to expand...

How many of those former senior intelligence officials have actually had hands on access to the computer or contents? How many former senior intelligence officials would know how to analyze computers or computer data? People at the top of bureaucracies don't get their hands dirty with real work; and when they get to the "senior" level, the technology will have bypassed them by a decade or two.
 
#56,003
#56,003
BowlBrother85 said:
The Biden campaign dismissed the story from the NY Post in its entirety. This is PizzaGate 2.0. You are a nut.
Click to expand...

My comment was that in the DNC email leak the information was not "disinformation".

If you think Radcliffe is not trustworthy as a political partisan it's hard to see how you would not also consider Biden a political partisan and his denial as questionable.

I've not said I buy into this or not. You claimed with certainty it is fake yet you can provide not evidence other than a denial from the accused and and some general speculation.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Orange_Crush, tennvols77, VolnJC and 1 other person
#56,005
#56,005
AM64 said:
How many of those former senior intelligence officials have actually had hands on access to the computer or contents? How many former senior intelligence officials would know how to analyze computers or computer data? People at the top of bureaucracies don't get their hands dirty with real work; and when they get to the "senior" level, the technology will have bypassed them by a decade or two.
Click to expand...
I get that you want to believe this story, because you think that it might help Trump win the election. What you are willing to believe against a Democrat, you would never believe against Trump - with the same degree of "evidence" in support of this belief.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tvolsfan
#56,007
#56,007
BowlBrother85 said:
I get that you want to believe this story, because you think that it might help Trump win the election. What you are willing to believe against a Democrat, you would never believe against Trump - with the same degree of "evidence" in support of this belief.
Click to expand...

you believed the Steele dossier no?

this has the same validity so far.

at this point we just don't know
 
  • Like
Reactions: Orange_Crush and AM64
#56,010
#56,010
BowlBrother85 said:
I get that you want to believe this story, because you think that it might help Trump win the election. What you are willing to believe against a Democrat, you would never believe against Trump - with the same degree of "evidence" in support of this belief.
Click to expand...

I've said in several posts since the story broke that I didn't trust it - simply too convenient. You are making all the arguments against the story that others are making for. Would I like it to be true. Absolutely, but I'm certainly not going to bet on it in the least. We'll shall see what we see ... or don't.
 
#56,014
#56,014
AM64 said:
I've said in several posts since the story broke that I didn't trust it - simply too convenient. You are making all the arguments against the story that others are making for. Would I like it to be true. Absolutely, but I'm certainly not going to bet on it in the least. We'll shall see what we see ... or don't.
Click to expand...

it's the funny part - both he and LG were full in on the Steele Dossier (for which there is actual evidence of Russian disinformation) but immediately claim this is Russian disinformation without any reporting establishing that.

there is also the separate sourcing coming from HB's former business partner that provides information consistent with the HB laptop info.

maybe it's all BS but at this point we don't know
 
  • Like
Reactions: Orange_Crush, tennvols77, VolnJC and 1 other person
#56,016
#56,016
AM64 said:
simply too convenient.
Click to expand...
Too convenient... and since this story wants to also involve child pornography, it's too similar to another hoax - PizzaGate. That is a pretty ambitious step to take. They were better off just leaving it as Hunter Biden using his father's name to sell political influence. This is just too much.
 
#56,017
#56,017
BigOrangeTrain said:
If this was Trump you would be slamming him with everything you got. The real Russia/China connection is being uncovered about Hunter and his pedophile father and your side looks even dumber now.
Click to expand...
And you would be defending him with everything you got. You are eager to believe things about Biden you would never believe about Trump - with the same amount of evidence.
 
#56,023
#56,023
jaybird_1981 said:
To say the FBI won't sit on evidence was my point, They will absolutely sit on evidence if it benefits them to do so no matter what the subject matter is.
Click to expand...
Meh... I do not believe that they have been sitting on child pornography on Hunter Biden's laptop for a year, and we are just now hearing about it, two weeks before the election. Something that explosive would have leaked.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top