2020 Presidential Race

The exact opposite is true.
Because with popular vote winning by 58 - 42 would be far better than winning by 51 - 49.
The electoral college motivates candidates to only focus on states that could go either way - and that aint many.
Thats not true at all. Popular vote would mean only the large met areas have a say in every election. Those are mainly blue areas of the country. It would be a big FU to rural America.
 
Shouldn't California and Texas have more senators than say North and South Dakota. I don't think that is fair representation.
No. They get more representatives in the House for that.

But I'm sure that's probably been pointed out by now.

Damn thread moves too fast for me to keep up.
 
You like to talk fringe weapons because you know talking about what you deem “necessary for protection “ is not a reasonable or rational way to sway opinions . How do you eat an elephant they asked .. one bite at a time I said .
You have to establish a base line before any debate can truly take place.

My baseline is that people do not have the right to own any weapon of their choice. It's sometimes necessary to go to the extreme to get people to even accept that baseline starting point.
 
what religious liberty? You talking about the Pastors and Churches that actively involve themselves in politics but enjoy tax exempt status?
I’m talking about pastors and churches having the right to believe and teach what they believe without government interference. Churches also should not be forced to hire LGBT members bc the government said so which Harris and Biden want
 
Sweet.... so like the rest of the population

The original argument was that if you vote by mail it shouldn't count because you're lazy and we shouldn't care what lazy people think. There are a number of ways to find flaws in such an argument but it's easier to simply point back to a few months ago when the president himself voted by mail.
 

VN Store



Back
Top