2020 Presidential Race

It’s not hard for me since I get my news from reputable sources. But the challenge is everyone on Twitter and facebook has an equal voice. Twitter has to have some kind of responsibility because otherwise you get a ton of posts claiming vaccines cause autism, hate groups posting untrue stories, etc. Also a ton of the posts are done by bots with stock or fake profile images, so it’s not even real people posting these things
Except those aren't tagged or suspended. Russian collusion stories didn't get posts tagged or suspended. Twitter chose a side and went for it months before an election in an attempt to influence
 
I was using the bottom Tweet th o show the lack of downvotes...its pretty obvious Joe won but Dems are going to lose 15 seats in the House and didnt do well in Senate races as planned voting doesnt match
Yeah if the not voting down the ticket is true..... that does raise red flags
 
  • Like
Reactions: VolnJC
Except those aren't tagged or suspended. Russian collusion stories didn't get posts tagged or suspended. Twitter chose a side and went for it months before an election in an attempt to influence
Yep...... it made me laugh all the fact checking they did in Bidens favor
 
no, it turns out they weren't making false claims. How many were tagged that said there was absolutely collusion?

Twitter is not the fact checking authority nor should that be their goal. They are extremely biased in their checking and any honest person would concede that. Who gave twitter this authority? Why do you need someone to evaluate "truth" for you? Is it really that hard to do it on your own?
Can you imagine if we flagged everything on here that we immediately knew was wrong? Lol
 
no, it turns out they weren't making false claims. How many were tagged that said there was absolutely collusion?

Twitter is not the fact checking authority nor should that be their goal. They are extremely biased in their checking and any honest person would concede that. Who gave twitter this authority? Why do you need someone to evaluate "truth" for you? Is it really that hard to do it on your own?
It's ironic that they do so in the name of protecting our election process, but effectively apply it in such a way that one candidate can speak about the election and another is blocked from doing so.

They're helping to create a narrative that chooses a candidate in the eyes of the public, while the election is still going through the legal process.
 
I think we can have a paper vote.

I don't know if we can have a vote which is without claims of cheating, though.
My architectural exams are proctored/monitored. To get in I have to schedule the test, show up on time, provide ID, leave all personal effects in a locker. Get photo ID'd, have my photo taken, finger print taken (not during covid), searched (metal detector only now, used to come with a pat down too) sign in, given paper and pen, taken directly to the computer station, enclosed on three sides, with a camera directly behind, and several more in the room. Me leaving the chair has to be approved, and they randomly patrol the tests, literally looking over your shoulder some times.

And there are still cases of cheating. Considering that even requiring a voter ID is racist, no reasonable person could argue there isnt plenty of cheating going on. It's just impossible, because of the lack of checks, to prove any of it. And that's how the parties want it
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64 and McDad
Or maybe they were filling them out so fast they didnt have time...remember there are states that allow same day registration and voting by mail this year

It still doesn’t add up. This massive fraud scheme across multiple states but not fill out the Senate bubble? Whoever organized this did a terrible job of execution if they only filled out Prez. That’s putting a lot of faith the people to flip the Senate for you. Especially given Trump was more likely to lose honestly than the Senate candidates.

Regardless I’m skeptical of these numbers. Where did they come from and how where they provided? If accurate, How does it compare to previous years? Honest questions.

My guess is there are plenty of right leaning folks who just don’t like Trump. They voted for Biden but also for the Reps House and Senate candidates. If you are in the Never Trump camp you are probably willing to gamble on 4 years of Biden with a GOP Congress.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jmva1
My architectural exams are proctored/monitored. To get in I have to schedule the test, show up on time, provide ID, leave all personal effects in a locker. Get photo ID'd, have my photo taken, finger print taken (not during covid), searched (metal detector only now, used to come with a pat down too) sign in, given paper and pen, taken directly to the computer station, enclosed on three sides, with a camera directly behind, and several more in the room. Me leaving the chair has to be approved, and they randomly patrol the tests, literally looking over your shoulder some times.

And there are still cases of cheating. Considering that even requiring a voter ID is racist, no reasonable person could argue there isnt plenty of cheating going on. It's just impossible, because of the lack of checks, to prove any of it. And that's how the parties want it

Deep body cavity checks too?
 

VN Store



Back
Top