2020 Presidential Race

#77,904
#77,904
Orange_Crush said:
"Factual evidence"? I don't know, but WTH do you even mean by that?

What was the standard of "truth" by the ministry of truth when they were reporting that Trump was/is a Manchurian candidate for Russia? That he took piss showers from Russian hookers? That he called dead vets suckers? That the Covington Catholic kid had a punchable smirk as he taunted a poor, innocent Native American chief?

But let anyone try to offer another perspective on the election? It's shut down. What's so dangerous about letting people talk about potential election fraud?
Click to expand...

Pretty sure Nick Sandman will be just fine.

To act like there were no connections between Trump's campaign and Russians is insane.

And fine, let's investigate this election. To assume I don't want Trump's last days in office to be a whiny, dishonest quagmire like the rest of the four years is mistaken.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Purple Tiger
#77,907
#77,907
DJimgo said:
Pretty sure Nick Sandman will be just fine.

To act like there were no connections between Trump's campaign and Russians is insane.

And fine, let's investigate this election. To assume I don't want Trump's last days in office to be a whiny, dishonest quagmire like the rest of the four years is mistaken.
Click to expand...
to still be believing this is insane. They really sold you on that didn't they
 
  • Like
Reactions: Orange_Crush
#77,908
#77,908
DJimgo said:
Pretty sure Nick Sandman will be just fine.

To act like there were no connections between Trump's campaign and Russians is insane.

And fine, let's investigate this election. To assume I don't want Trump's last days in office to be a whiny, dishonest quagmire like the rest of the four years is mistaken.
Click to expand...

I'm not talking about investigation. It's being investigated. I'm talking about reporting it.

And your first two sentences were deflections. To defend the suppression, you asked if she was about to drop proof. I pointed out that that hasn't been the standard of journalism until this specific topic. It's suspicious as hell, whether you want to carry water for it or not.
 
#77,910
#77,910
theFallGuy said:
to still be believing this is insane. They really sold you on that didn't they
Click to expand...
It just goes to reinforce the VAST difference between how the MSM and social media pushed that, and how they're claiming it a virtue to suppress this b/c it doesn't meet some internal standard of "proof". It's absurd.
 
#77,914
#77,914
DJimgo said:
Pretty sure Nick Sandman will be just fine.

To act like there were no connections between Trump's campaign and Russians is insane.

And fine, let's investigate this election. To assume I don't want Trump's last days in office to be a whiny, dishonest quagmire like the rest of the four years is mistaken.
Click to expand...
It’s not a matter whether sandman or whether you believe the Russian story was true..... it is that the media tries to manipulate things to make believe how they want them to believe.... Trump was investigated over Russia with very little evidence pointing to collusion.... the investigation also found no evidence of collusion.
 
#77,915
#77,915
DJimgo said:
Guess I'm just looking forward to a President that will side with our team over Putin. And guess what? It's happening.
Click to expand...
What has trump done action wise that has helped Putin..... These are the nonsense talking points that I am referring too.... Biden is president and I will support.... I hope he makes wise decisions while in office.... He was an absolute horrible choice to be president of the United States though
 
  • Like
Reactions: theFallGuy and Sandman 423
#77,917
#77,917
Does anyone remember when the Dems were interviewing Amy Barrett, they asked her if she would abstain from voting on the election if it came before the Supreme Court, since Trump had appointed her and so they felt it'd be a conflict of interest?

Does anyone find it suspicious that the Dems were thinking about that and trying to hedge their benefit when it happened?
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
#77,921
#77,921
volbeast33 said:
What has trump done action wise that has helped Putin..... These are the nonsense talking points that I am referring too.... Biden is president and I will support.... I hope he makes wise decisions while in office.... He was an absolute horrible choice to be president of the United States though
Click to expand...
Biden is not President, and the system has not produced him as the next President either. The media doesn't select our presidents. The system will.
 
#77,923
#77,923
volbeast33 said:
What has trump done action wise that has helped Putin..... These are the nonsense talking points that I am referring too.... Biden is president and I will support.... I hope he makes wise decisions while in office.... He was an absolute horrible choice to be president of the United States though
Click to expand...

Supporting their re-entry into the G7, sh\tting on NATO at every turn, allowing him to spread dis-info into our elections without consequences, hired Manafort who was in debt to oligarchs, denying his negotiations for a Trump tower in Moscow, taking Russian agression toward the Ukraine off the platform before the convention...

Actually nevermind, you're right
 
#77,924
#77,924
VolStrom said:
Yep 70+ million people are dumb and on the wrong side. WTF was I thinking when I voted for dRumph?
Click to expand...


70 million people are not singular in their reasons. The key will be the contrast. Incendiary and tumultuous that might have been satisfying in the short term versus stability and calm where maybe the value is not apparent.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Purple Tiger
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top