2020 Presidential Race

70 million people are not singular in their reasons. The key will be the contrast. Incendiary and tumultuous that might have been satisfying in the short term versus stability and calm where maybe the value is not apparent.
Who is incendiary and tumultuous, the democrats or the republicans? Bring on your calm and collected demeanour and say we all need to get along. I'm all for doing the same thing the democrats did when Trump won and try to burn down the world.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
Define small.

Just like there are differences in alcohol. A shot of beer is nothing. A shot of some high grade stuff can hit like a freight train.

I dont know of any way to successfully compare a length of a line of cocaine to alcohol. But I doubt a single grain of coke is going to jack you up worse than doing a shot of moonshine.
True. I was srguing from a beer perspective.
 
The media is the biggest issue in this country right now
Did you watch that press conference? I just did online. They gave a list of evidences they had, sworn affidavits, eye witnesses, irregularities. The press in the room did not ask about that, they shouted accusations at them, called them sore losers, and tried to explain it away. That’s our media. They aren’t investigating this, they are simply there to chastise President Trump and defend Biden/democrats at all costs. It is not only awful, but scary for the future of this country. Only one side is allowed to have a voice.
 
Did you watch that press conference? I just did online. They gave a list of evidences they had, sworn affidavits, eye witnesses, irregularities. The press in the room did not ask about that, they shouted accusations at them, called them sore losers, and tried to explain it away. That’s our media. They aren’t investigating this, they are simply there to chastise President Trump and defend Biden/democrats at all costs. It is not only awful, but scary for the future of this country. Only one side is allowed to have a voice.

Preach it .....never stop letting the truth from being shut down.
 
Did you watch that press conference? I just did online. They gave a list of evidences they had, sworn affidavits, eye witnesses, irregularities. The press in the room did not ask about that, they shouted accusations at them, called them sore losers, and tried to explain it away. That’s our media. They aren’t investigating this, they are simply there to chastise President Trump and defend Biden/democrats at all costs. It is not only awful, but scary for the future of this country. Only one side is allowed to have a voice.
Yep..... it’s very scary what the media is doing they are manipulating the populous..... democrats are being manipulated as well but they can’t see it bc they assume it is their side
 
Yep..... it’s very scary what the media is doing they are manipulating the populous..... democrats are being manipulated as well but they can’t see it bc they assume it is their side
Exactly. Even if you think their evidence is bunk, we deserve to be able to hear their case and decide for ourselves. The media functioning as our overlords and determining what we can hear is un-American and a dangerous practice.
 
Exactly. Even if you think their evidence is bunk, we deserve to be able to hear their case and decide for ourselves. The media functioning as our overlords and determining what we can hear is un-American and a dangerous practice.

That was a very bad look for that little Sh!t Cavuto, it’s not his play to decide when or where the administration lays out its evidence or if it’s evidence .
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64 and NCFisher
Real Clear Politics have pulled AZ, GA, & PA back into play...edit: Possibly weren't changed. I thought they had been.

live_map_president.png


Michigan, Wisconsin, Nevada up next?

Wasn't CNN leading the celebration party?

EmapIW9U4AAWsOO
 
Last edited:
That was a very bad look for that little Sh!t Cavuto, it’s not his play to decide when or where the administration lays out its evidence or if it’s evidence .
And the fact is, he’s wanting proof but not allowing them to take their evidence to court. They have whistleblowers and sworn affidavits along with other things. The courts decide if that is sufficient proof of fraud, not the media. It is so obvious what the media is doing. All of us should be concerned about this.

Fox gonna pay like the other networks for it tho:
 
Exactly. Even if you think their evidence is bunk, we deserve to be able to hear their case and decide for ourselves. The media functioning as our overlords and determining what we can hear is un-American and a dangerous practice.
Lies are fdefeated by being exposed. Truth is defeated by being suppressed.
 
And the fact is, he’s wanting proof but not allowing them to take their evidence to court. They have whistleblowers and sworn affidavits along with other things. The courts decide if that is sufficient proof of fraud, not the media. It is so obvious what the media is doing. All of us should be concerned about this.

Fox gonna pay like the other networks for it tho:

They've unmasked themselves.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bassmaster_Vol
So Fox News is controlled opposition because even they are now not letting them spew their B.S. without evidence? Now if it was OAN or Russian news that’s controlled media that supports your view then that’s fine.

View attachment 321933
They were presenting their evidence that they are then taking to court. Does the media have the right to decide if we can hear their evidence? Do you think that’s good and safe practice for this country?
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64 and 0nelilreb
They were presenting their evidence that they are then taking to court. Does the media have the right to decide if we can hear their evidence? Do you think that’s good and safe practice for this country?

So why do a press conference and present your evidence there instead of just taking it to court? It’s just a ploy to sow more b.s. in your base and he wasn’t having it.

What was the evidence she presented?
 
  • Like
Reactions: DJimgo
So why do a press conference and present your evidence there instead of just taking it to court? It’s just a ploy to sow more b.s. in your base and he wasn’t having it.

What was the evidence she presented?
That’s for you to listen to and determine. The media is to report what is being said, not control what is being said. Don’t you agree? They refused to let you hear what they had and why they were suing.

They are taking it to court. Some of the things they mentioned were sworn affidavits from poll workers and whistleblowers, they had a sworn affidavit from someone saying they were ordered to backdate mail in ballots, eyewitnesses claiming they were not allowed to observe the counting of ballots which is illegal, they mentioned the computer software problems, and other irregularities. You can watch the video for yourself, but not from major news orgs that are controlling what you’re allowed to hear.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64

VN Store



Back
Top