2020 Presidential Race

#77,952
#77,952
GoBigOrangeUT said:
Are you trolling? Serious question.
Click to expand...
Nope. When I saw the way they called AZ, I thought it suspect as hell. Even the on-air personalities were in disbelief.

Why would you think I'm trolling? I've never been a Fox news fanboy. Election night was probably the 3rd time I've watched them this year. The first two were Tucker Carlson's interviews about the Hunter laptop.

I lean toward a belief in the deep state that owns the MSM and has been trying to affect a soft coup against President Trump for four years. I was open about it in the impeachment and TrumPutin threads. I'm not sure why you had any respect for me to begin with, or would just now be losing it.

I haven't hidden my suspicions or accusations.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NurseGoodVol, TN-POSSUM, Ulysees E. McGill and 3 others
#77,953
#77,953
  • Like
Reactions: OldVolMan
#77,956
#77,956
DJimgo said:
Supporting their re-entry into the G7, sh\tting on NATO at every turn, allowing him to spread dis-info into our elections without consequences, hired Manafort who was in debt to oligarchs, denying his negotiations for a Trump tower in Moscow, taking Russian agression toward the Ukraine off the platform before the convention...

Actually nevermind, you're right
Click to expand...
Why would you not want them at the G7 summit? It makes no sense to not have all the major countries there for discussion ...... I agree with Trump.... NATO is a horrible deal.....they use us for our money and military might..... Manafort was a bad hire by trump but to assume it was bc of Russia is ridiculous...... trump has business dealings all over the world so it would be safe to assume he had some in russia...... he upheld Obama’s sanctions....he sanctioned them over their oil manipulation.... he added new sanctions over attempted inference in mid terms.... he had sanctions several times over the Ukraine.... kicked diplomats out over security risk..... I could go on and on
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
#77,957
#77,957
golfballs said:
Click to expand...


a03286a459.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64, TheBigOne10 and Fun coupon VOL
#77,963
#77,963
Giving all due credit to Evil-Lawyer for this one earlier, but I'd like to run this one back for anyone who missed it - damn catchy tune:

 
#77,966
#77,966
Bassmaster_Vol said:
That’s for you to listen to and determine. The media is to report what is being said, not control what is being said. Don’t you agree? They refused to let you hear what they had and why they were suing.

They are taking it to court. Some of the things they mentioned were sworn affidavits from poll workers and whistleblowers, they had a sworn affidavit from someone saying they were ordered to backdate mail in ballots, eyewitnesses claiming they were not allowed to observe the counting of ballots which is illegal, they mentioned the computer software problems, and other irregularities. You can watch the video for yourself, but not from major news orgs that are controlling what you’re allowed to hear.
Click to expand...

In that situation, they do not have to allow their conference to continue on there. They can report on it after the fact if needed. Media should never be a mouthpiece for the president and be able to freely say the other side is guilty of something before it’s even brought to court, especially when they make false claims over and over to make you believe it’s true no matter if you have the evidence or not.

So some software problems is evidence of rigging? For the other issues, we’ll see if there’s any truth to it once they go to court. If the judge dismisses it, I doubt any of these supporters will say “oh I guess we were wrong.”
 
#77,967
#77,967
USMC-TNVOL said:
In that situation, they do not have to allow their conference to continue on there. They can report on it after the fact if needed. Media should never be a mouthpiece for the president and be able to freely say the other side is guilty of something before it’s even brought to court, especially when they make false claims over and over to make you believe it’s true no matter if you have the evidence or not.

So some software problems is evidence of rigging? For the other issues, we’ll see if there’s any truth to it once they go to court. If the judge dismisses it, I doubt any of these supporters will say “oh I guess we were wrong.”
Click to expand...
It doesn’t matter what I think of the evidence. Showing the press secretary of the President of the United States giving her press conference is not being a mouthpiece. It’s allowing the leader of the free world to make his case to the American people. They censored him to keep you from hearing it.

I can’t believe people cannot see what a dangerous precedent this is
 
  • Like
Reactions: NurseGoodVol, AM64, TN-POSSUM and 6 others
#77,968
#77,968
Just re-watched McCain’s concession speech. Can’t imagine a more stark contrast between a real man like McCain and that little boy we have in office right now.


 
  • Like
Reactions: ohhbother
#77,971
#77,971
OHvol40 said:
Just re-watched McCain’s concession speech. Can’t imagine a more stark contrast between a real man like McCain and that little boy we have in office right now.


Click to expand...

Good speech but a weak candidate that got excited about a bimbo in a skirt and tanked his campaign.
 
  • Like
Reactions: StarRaider
#77,973
#77,973
MarcoVol said:
Not true. Not true of either side. The ones who get the most attention by the media are the ones who are most “against” the other side. Bc that leads to turmoil. And turmoil sells.

They’re not gonna put a ton of moderate left or moderate right people on tv. Although I’d say that’s where the majority of America is with their belief system, it just doesn’t sell like turmoil.

All my opinion of course.
Click to expand...
I hope you are right, but it looks to me like that is the tail that wags the Democratic party dog.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top