2020 Presidential Race

#79,308
#79,308
titansvolsfaninga said:
you should compare that with the republican party......Nazis and Full Blown Facists.
Click to expand...


Velo Vol said:
Why is PA's extension bad, but NC's isn't? It's a real mystery.

Click to expand...

I think any massive changes by election officials or politicians or courts leading up to an election are “bad“ and a disservice to citizens. I think the contention in North Carolina is that the legislature gave election boards great discretion and did not legislatively fence the boundaries.
 
#79,316
#79,316
Potentially saw a "glitch" that could have cost Trump votes in any of the Dominion software votes.

According to the Dominion user manual: "With the Party Preference contest, the voter selects their preferred party, and any contests which do not belong to the same Elector Group are ignored when the ballot is cast."

IOW, all one would have to do to rob people of their votes for Trump would be to register him in that system as a "RepubIican" candidate, and anyone voting straight Republican ticket would NOT have voted for Trump.

I'll write the registration in all lowercase to expose why: repubiican. This is the same types of domain shenanigans used in many phishing attacks, etc... IOW, it's a well known tactic known in the hacking world.

I don't know what kind of logging these machines keep, but if they retain the party affiliation each candidate is programmed to, it would be an easy find that would flip votes. This is just to show how easy it would be to misuse election software, and how specific the evidence would be for flipping #s.

Note that a hack like this one could cost any/all candidates on either ticket. You could possibly list all candidates in the "asshat" party, and anyone who's selected their true party and voted for them would have thrown out their vote for them because the didn't choose the "asshat" party as their preferred party.
 
#79,317
#79,317
Potentially saw a "glitch" that could have cost Trump votes in any of the Dominion software votes.

According to the Dominion user manual: "With the Party Preference contest, the voter selects their preferred party, and any contests which do not belong to the same Elector Group are ignored when the ballot is cast."

IOW, all one would have to do to rob people of their votes for Trump would be to register him in that system as a "RepubIican" candidate, and anyone voting straight Republican ticket would NOT have voted for Trump.

I'll write the registration in all lowercase to expose why: repubiican. This is the same types of domain shenanigans used in many phishing attacks, etc... IOW, it's a well known tactic known in the hacking world.

I don't know what kind of logging these machines keep, but if they retain the party affiliation each candidate is programmed to, it would be an easy find that would flip votes. This is just to show how easy it would be to misuse election software, and how specific the evidence would be for flipping #s.
 
#79,318
#79,318
Orange_Crush said:
Potentially saw a "glitch" that could have cost Trump votes in any of the Dominion software votes.

According to the Dominion user manual: "With the Party Preference contest, the voter selects their preferred party, and any contests which do not belong to the same Elector Group are ignored when the ballot is cast."

IOW, all one would have to do to rob people of their votes for Trump would be to register him in that system as a "RepubIican" candidate, and anyone voting straight Republican ticket would NOT have voted for Trump.

I'll write the registration in all lowercase to expose why: repubiican. This is the same types of domain shenanigans used in many phishing attacks, etc... IOW, it's a well known tactic known in the hacking world.

I don't know what kind of logging these machines keep, but if they retain the party affiliation each candidate is programmed to, it would be an easy find that would flip votes. This is just to show how easy it would be to misuse election software, and how specific the evidence would be for flipping #s.

Note that a hack like this one could cost any/all candidates on either ticket. You could possibly list all candidates in the "asshat" party, and anyone who's selected their true party and voted for them would have thrown out their vote for them because the didn't choose the "asshat" party as their preferred party.
Click to expand...

For anyone who's interested, one common way to uncover hacks such as this is to script case-insensitive searches for what we expect to find and look at the remainders. If you hunted case-insentive for republican, and found the delta containing "RepubIican", you'd know to look deeper. Another (sometimes used in tandem) is to return all values present in all uppercase and/or lowercase.

Other ways could be as easy as changing the display font.

RepubIican

The hack is incredibly hard to find at glance, but very easy to find in data analysis.
 
#79,322
#79,322
OHvol40 said:
Are you sure that’s exactly why the EC was advocated for? Who introduced it, argued for it and why? Take a look and let me know.

edit: here is a good read on the subject

Five Common Misconceptions About the Electoral College
Click to expand...

The Atlantic is a bigger piece of trash than WaPo and the NYT combined. Anybody with a sense of objectivity has likely never likely made it completely through one of their pieces of drivel or even bothers to look at an Atlantic diatribe after experiencing a couple. Something like a snooty Pravda read.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top