Caculator
No sane person wants to live on planet of the apes
- Joined
- Nov 30, 2013
- Messages
- 3,222
- Likes
- 4,033
It's right back to their strategy of say one thing, do another. People like luther has admited he doesnt care what they do as long as they talk nice. He wants a president that SEEMS responsible.The left: Let's all unite, let's come together.
Also the left: Let's keep a list of people who supported Trump so that we can target them for attack. All Trump supporters are racists, homophobic, deplorables
The Atlantic is a bigger piece of trash than WaPo and the NYT combined. Anybody with a sense of objectivity has likely never likely made it completely through one of their pieces of drivel or even bothers to look at an Atlantic diatribe after experiencing a couple. Something like a snooty Pravda read.
No, the point is that Biden won this election... and some people just don't want to face reality. Some of the states being contested were not even close. Biden is going to end up winning Pennsylvania by well over 50,000 votes. He will win Michigan by over 150,000 votes.Isn't it? I think that's the point.
Wow. Well, that seals it then. If De Blasio's daughter said it, all bets are off and trump should be declared the winner!!Wow an honest Dem who would have thunk it?
De Blasio’s Daughter in Verbal Slip Up, Claims Biden “Was Able to Steal” Election
Perception is the problem.
Any possible fraud is blown out of proportion by one side to play to their base and ignored By your side to play to the base. You just posted a lie that the guy recanted. He didn’t. An anonymous source says he did and was paid. He still claims he didn’t recant and there’s no proof of payment but you chose to believe the imagery people as opposed to the person speaking publicly.
a tight and right system like Florida uses ends all this.
-must register to vote.
-Must request a ballot
-If ballot requested you cannot vote in person. As your name is blocked on the role.
-If you end up voting in person you sign an affidavit eliminating the mail in vote.
-no counting of ballots without both sides in attendance
I would add.
-counting Does not happen until all votes are in and secure.
It’s not hard. It would solve a lot of problems and has where used. But neither side gets to play games with perception if it’s used.
Trump was up 700,000 after all the legal ballots were counted in PANo, the point is that Biden won this election... and some people just don't want to face reality. Some of the states being contested were not even close. Biden is going to end up winning Pennsylvania by well over 50,000 votes. He will win Michigan by over 150,000 votes.
It's definitely not a good look. About as good as Biden saying before the election that they'd installed the most sweeping election fraud system in history.Wow. Well, that seals it then. If De Blasio's daughter said it, all bets are off and trump should be declared the winner!!
Lindsey G pretty much came out and said they need to kill the mass mail in ballot in future elections for Repubs to be able to win. Makes it too easy for the simple minded to vote. Need to get back to the normal practices of voter suppression and low voter turn out.Trump was up 700,000 after all the legal ballots were counted in PA
It shouldn't matter if the guy recanted or not. Too much is being made of that, as a part of this story. If the guy has evidence of voter fraud, then he should be allowed to make his case for that and show whatever evidence he has.The anonymous sources stole the narrative again.
If people are too lazy to vote in person they don't deserve the right to vote. Why are all these mail in votes democrats?Lindsey G pretty much came out and said they need to kill the mass mail in ballot in future elections for Repubs to be able to win. Makes it too easy for the simple minded to vote. Need to get back to the normal practices of voter suppression and low voter turn out.
Weren't you the one making a big deal of it?It shouldn't matter if the guy recanted or not. Too much is being made of that, as a part of this story. If the guy has evidence of voter fraud, then he should be allowed to make his case for that and show whatever evidence he has.
However, it sounds like it all centers around something which he overheard other people talking about doing, rather than what he observed them doing. It's not going to be easy for him to prove that it actually happened. But if he can prove it happened? Then prove it.