2020 Presidential Race

People took more time casting their vote as they took this one more seriously then past ones. Turnout would be an example of people taking this one more seriously
So all the additional hoops people had to jump thru with the naked envelopes, declaration page, and signature only 1k out of 2.6 million were wrong? So this election but not the primary in the spring where there was a 1.4% error rate wasn't important? I can no longer take you seriously as a poster if you are sticking with that answer...you have slidden down to sheep or troll status
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64 and GSD82
One's own words should be submitted as evidence, no?

If you look at that quote in context he wasn't admitting to committing fraud. It's ironic that the people who are trying to prove malfeasance are themselves being dishonest. Maybe that should count as evidence for this being a witch hunt?
 
I wonder if the PA AG and SOS made some money off this election?, they both guaranteed Trump would lose even before election day...wonder if they have anything to with the 0.038% rejection rate...keep in mind these "count all the votes" folks like the AG also sued to have the Green Party taken off the ballot
 
By me? Are my opinions representative of roughly half the electorate? I don't claim to speak for any party, only myself.

Also, upon further review, that quote was not a gaffe but was taken out of context.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2020/11/04/bogus-vote-fraud-claims-proliferate-social-media/
The Washington Post stepping in to say "what he meant was" LOL. The media isn't supposed to step in and translate what they think he meant. Another example why the media are frauds and can't be trusted. I will take this statement as a slip up and he actually said what he knew to be true.
 
  • Like
Reactions: W.TN.Orange Blood
The Washington Post stepping in to say "what he meant was" LOL. The media isn't supposed to step in and translate what they think he meant. Another example why the media are frauds and can't be trusted. I will take this statement as a slip up and he actually said what he knew to be true.

But you're assuming you know what he meant...? So should we assume you're a fraud as well, following the standard you've just set?

Take it to court and see how far that gets you if you like. I'll be glad to laugh at the idiocy of yet another one of these nonsense lawsuits.
 
But you're assuming you know what he meant...? So should we assume you're a fraud as well, following the standard you've just set?

Take it to court and see how far that gets you if you like. I'll be glad to laugh at the idiocy of yet another one of these nonsense lawsuits.
I don't have to assume, I heard his own words.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
I wrote a parsing script to log every election night vote tally update from PA where Trump's total vote count decreased. (Using live election feed data here: https://static01.nyt.com/elections-...0-11-03/race-page/pennsylvania/president.json)

Against the data from election night, my script shows that Trump lost 408564 votes over 34 updates. I haven't yet written the code that would account for "Switched" votes where Biden may have gotten the robbed votes as the original analysts claimed.

From my personal results, their claims are proving against PA data.

(Note: I'm not expecting our #s to be the same, as my formula is fairly hasty, more crude than theirs probably is, and as I'm obviously working independently of them, without having looked at their code. My math merely proves lost votes in the data.)
 

VN Store



Back
Top