2020 Presidential Race

[GSD82]

Stupid logic at that.......always has been. Their policies never work well for the good of America.

They aren't meant to be for the good of America

 

[Orangeslice13]

The truth is I don’t like Biden. I don’t like a lot of his policies. There’s a lot I don’t like that is no different than Trump. They both are terrible on the budget and spending. As a result I don’t like Trump either.

All that means nothing in relation to my belief that we have an election problem, perceived or in reality. We need to fix it.

 

[StarRaider]

Welp, that confirms it - 71 million racists in the USA.

On Election Night, American Racism Was Quantified

"Every vote for Trump summoned my old anxieties"
let's see 71000000 / [5 hrs x 3600 sec/hr] = 4,000 summons per second... seems like a lot to keep track of to me.

 

[BowlBrother85]

Solid work Lincoln Project

BIGGEST LOSERS: Lincoln-Themed Liberal Super PAC Goes 0-7 in Key Senate Races - Washington Free Beacon

The overwhelming majority of their ads were geared towards defeating Trump... so yes, solid work indeed.

 

[Orange_Crush]

Go to:

https://static01.nyt.com/elections-...0-11-03/race-page/pennsylvania/president.json

That is the official NYT feed from the "Edison Research" data. It is at least official enough that it's what the media have used to call races.

You should be able to click somewhere to view as JSON as opposed to raw data or just headers. (If anyone has Visual Studio, Notepad++, etc, you can actually download the data as its own .json file and analyze there.

Once you're viewing it as json, you're seeing it displayed as human-readable structured data.

Click on the drop-down for "data", then "races", then "0", then "timeseries".

Each timeseries is a numbered data update from the pollsters. (This is the PA presidential race.) Each contains (among other things) an entry for total votes, each candidate will have a % of votes, and it will have a timestamp.

Click through to the update #s 187 and 188:

Find the raw numbers and do the math yourself. Multiply the total # of votes for that update by each candidate's % of votes. That will give you each candidate's vote total for each of these updates.

Report back here what you find, please.

 

[BowlBrother85]

The truth is I don’t like Biden. I don’t like a lot of his policies. There’s a lot I don’t like that is no different than Trump. They both are terrible on the budget and spending. As a result I don’t like Trump either.

All that means nothing in relation to my belief that we have an election problem, perceived or in reality. We need to fix it.

We do not have a problem with systemic fraud in our election system, as Trump is claiming.

 

[Orangeslice13]

We do not have a problem with systemic fraud in our election system, as Trump is claiming.

I hope we don’t. The investigation is being done and the truth will come out.

 

[Orange_Crush]

Even if you concede the following states to Trump:

North Carolina (15 electoral college votes) - and it should be called for Trump soon.
Georgia (16 electoral college votes)
Arizona (11 electoral college votes)
Nevada (6 electoral college votes)

This only leaves Trump with 265 electoral college votes. There is not a path to 270 electoral college votes for Trump without winning one of the states among Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Michigan or Minnesota. That is a fact.

These are the current margins for Biden in those 4 states:

Wisconsin (plus 20,000)
Pennsylvania (plus 50,000)
Michigan (plus 146,000)
Minnesota (plus 230,000)

The vote counting appears to be over in Wisconsin. The counting in Pennsylvania continues to increase Biden's lead, which is already beyond the threshold for a recount. For Trump to win, his legal team will have to find systemic fraud in either Wisconsin or Pennsylvania, but by their own admission in court - THERE IS NONE!

Throw PA in and what do you get?

 

[BowlBrother85]

I think trump lost. I also think the system is suspect. There’s a huge number of people that think it’s suspect. That could be easily fixed

Yes, the people who wanted Trump to win, are the people complaining. It's called sour grapes.

 

[Bassmaster_Vol]

I think trump lost. I also think the system is suspect. There’s a huge number of people that think it’s suspect. That could be easily fixed

Yeah I don't think there is any going back. I think there was fraud and I also think that there is something wrong with the computer software. Even if there is no way that Trump can win, that doesn't matter, we need to find these errors and fix them so that they don't happen again in 2024. All of us should want that.

 

[Orange_Crush]

Sure. Post an example of a loss from one timestamp to the next.

Go to:

https://static01.nyt.com/elections-...0-11-03/race-page/pennsylvania/president.json

That is the official NYT feed from the "Edison Research" data. It is at least official enough that it's what the media have used to call races.

You should be able to click somewhere to view as JSON as opposed to raw data or just headers. (If anyone has Visual Studio, Notepad++, etc, you can actually download the data as its own .json file and analyze there.

Once you're viewing it as json, you're seeing it displayed as human-readable structured data.

Click on the drop-down for "data", then "races", then "0", then "timeseries".

Each timeseries is a numbered data update from the pollsters. (This is the PA presidential race.) Each contains (among other things) an entry for total votes, each candidate will have a % of votes, and it will have a timestamp.

Click through to the update #s 187 and 188:

Find the raw numbers and do the math yourself. Multiply the total # of votes for that update by each candidate's % of votes. That will give you each candidate's vote total for each of these updates.

Report back here what you find, please.

 

[BowlBrother85]

I hope we don’t. The investigation is being done and the truth will come out.

The Trump legal team is not even claiming fraud... at least not in court.

 

[RavinDave]

I wonder if Bernie knows that “ Secretary of labor “ here isn’t like the “ General Secretary “ title in mother Russia that his hero’s Lenin and Stalin held . Lol

But he wants the title changed.

Secretary of Forced Labor

 

[Bassmaster_Vol]

I hope we don’t. The investigation is being done and the truth will come out.

Will it come out though? Who will report it? The media in this country is so one sided that even if the Trump team proved fraud beyond a shadow of a doubt, the media would never report that. They would cover it up or cry foul, all the while screaming that Trump is a sore loser and should move on.

 

[volinbham]

The overwhelming majority of their ads were geared towards defeating Trump... so yes, solid work indeed.

got the data on that?

this is the same group too that got banned from Twitter for doxing some lawyers. class act

 

[volinbham]

Yes, the people who wanted Trump to win, are the people complaining. It's called sour grapes.

RUSSIA INTERFERED WITH THE ELECTION!

 

[BowlBrother85]

Throw PA in and what do you get?

Trump wins with Pennsylvania... but Trump isn't going to win Pennsylvania. With the count continuing to increase Biden's lead - Biden could win PA by 70,000 votes. It's not close enough for a recount. The Trump legal team is not even arguing that there was systemic fraud in PA.

It's over.

 

[Boston Vol]

Welp, that confirms it - 71 million racists in the USA.

On Election Night, American Racism Was Quantified

“Mitchell S Jackson is a contributing writer and author of the memoir Survival Math, and teaches creative writing at the University of Chicago.”

No!!!! One of my alma maters has already been ruined. Now the other one might be on the same path if they’re hiring people like Mr. Jackson.

 

[RavinDave]

Last week I thought I heard that the Biden campaign had declared “No Cabinet Members Will Come from the Senate”.

Did I imagine that or did they just throw it out there without really meaning it?

 

[BowlBrother85]

got the data on that?

this is the same group too that got banned from Twitter for doxing some lawyers. class act

Data? I followed their ads closely. I am pretty sure that I watched every single one of them. They were mostly attacks on Donald Trump.

 

[Orangeslice13]

Yes, the people who wanted Trump to win, are the people complaining. It's called sour grapes.

Why are you quoting me with this?
If you wanna address those people go ahead

 

[OldVolMan]

I was initially suspicious of this headline but then I realized it proclaims "truth" in all caps.

Is that the best you can come up with? So intelligent!

 

[Rifleman]

Go to:

https://static01.nyt.com/elections-...0-11-03/race-page/pennsylvania/president.json

That is the official NYT feed from the "Edison Research" data. It is at least official enough that it's what the media have used to call races.

You should be able to click somewhere to view as JSON as opposed to raw data or just headers. (If anyone has Visual Studio, Notepad++, etc, you can actually download the data as its own .json file and analyze there.

Once you're viewing it as json, you're seeing it displayed as human-readable structured data.

Click on the drop-down for "data", then "races", then "0", then "timeseries".

Each timeseries is a numbered data update from the pollsters. (This is the PA presidential race.) Each contains (among other things) an entry for total votes, each candidate will have a % of votes, and it will have a timestamp.

Click through to the update #s 187 and 188:

Find the raw numbers and do the math yourself. Multiply the total # of votes for that update by each candidate's % of votes. That will give you each candidate's vote total for each of these updates.

Report back here what you find, please.

You are calculating the vote totals yourself and each candidate's raw vote totals is not in this output? Is there another feed which includes that? Tell me what I am missing.

I assume their back end database is receiving a timed pull from the PA SBE dataset. Why aren't we looking at that data instead of a newspaper's javascript object notation?

Also does it make sense that nearly a half millions votes were moved on election night on a public facing website and people only noticed 10 days later?

 

[volinbham]

Data? I followed their ads closely. I am pretty sure that I watched every single one of them. They were mostly attacks on Donald Trump.

you watched every single ad they produced/paid for and have calculated that most were attacks on Trump and not ads against specific House and Senate candidates? Interesting.

 

[Orange_Vol1321]

We've reached the "software changed hundreds of thousands of votes to Biden" stage.

If this comes out in court and is true your comment will be??