NorthDallas40
Displaced Hillbilly
- Joined
- Oct 3, 2014
- Messages
- 56,859
- Likes
- 82,591
It seems that a random sample verified that the software that was supposed to be on there was the software that was on there. That settles it, especially with the claims that the software was designed by a Communist dictator to affect election fraud undetected.So they examined source code and algorithmic processing? A perfectly fine piece of hardware can run rotten code just fine. Your ānot surprisingā is āmeaninglessā
Nothing is undetectable. LolIt seems that a random sample verified that the software that was supposed to be on there was the software that was on there. That settles it, especially with the claims that the software was designed by a Communist dictator to affect election fraud undetected.
That settles that.
Are you at all familiar with software firmware and hardware configuration control requirements on certified hardware like say the military sensors I work on and.... oh... government election machines?Nothing is undetectable. Lol
Feared that he would gain 400k votes from 2016? Is that how trump suppressed the vote?