2020 Presidential Race

[GoBigOrangeUT]

The real question would be what margin of error is "acceptable?" Is 100% accurate the answer?

On the recount? I wouldn’t think 100% would be the likely outcome. In a perfect world, 100% would be attainable, but human error alone will bring that margin of error to 1-2% in my opinion.

 

[UT_VOLS13]

Isn’t it illegal to pump your own gas in Jersey?

Yes

 

[AM64]

If the machines are found to be "defective" either through a programming error or by design, it will cause an unprecedented crisis in this country.

Which means they cannot "be allowed" to be defective. This is the emperor has no clothes territory.

 

[SpaceCoastVol]

Jesus Christ.

No, I don't think He wants anything to do with that party.

 

[AM64]

No I agree with that, but a manual recount would find these discrepancies I would think.

If you have real honest to God paper ballots, you would think so.

 

[GoBigOrangeUT]

Which means they cannot "be allowed" to be defective. This is the emperor has no clothes territory.

Here’s my problem with that. I don’t believe for one second they are defective, but if they are, and the “Deep State” is in CYA mode, why even let it get public?

 

[AM64]

On the recount? I wouldn’t think 100% would be the likely outcome. In a perfect world, 100% would be attainable, but human error alone will bring that margin of error to 1-2% in my opinion.

1% for Trump would put him over the top in GA. We're talking very slim margins by percent.

 

[GoBigOrangeUT]

1% for Trump would put him over the top in GA. We're talking very slim margins by percent.

You’re right my math is bad. Let’s cut that in half and say +/- 0.25

 

[tvolsfan]

A recount would be unlikely to change more than a few hundred votes. Maybe a couple thousand on the high end. It isn't really realistic that a recount changes the outcome of a single state.

 

[Stew Cook]

Here’s my problem with that. I don’t believe for one second they are defective, but if they are, and the “Deep State” is in CYA mode, why even let it get public?

When you think about it, if someone wanted to call an election into question, it wouldn't necessarily be the candidate/party who apparently benefited from the fraud/errors being responsible. Actually it would be more beneficial to know where the apparent fraud/errors occurred and know that they were not benefiting the party or candidate claiming harm.

Devious minds, Deep State or otherwise, would not be obvious.

 

[Grand Vol]

On the recount? I wouldn’t think 100% would be the likely outcome. In a perfect world, 100% would be attainable, but human error alone will bring that margin of error to 1-2% in my opinion.

I was referring to a machine count versus a hand count. Theoretically, a hand count "should" be 100% accurate since it's eyes on each and every ballot.

My question is how much margin of error will be "acceptable" between the machine count and a hand count.

 

[UT_VOLS13]

'Personnel is policy': Progressive group gives Biden transition team 400 names to consider for administration

 

[Stew Cook]

What draws most ire (of conservatives at least) is the original crime he was investigated for and what evidence they had.

Yeah, I've gathered that. I'm not lobbying for him to be sent to Sing Sing, just curious to know more details.

 

[AM64]

Here’s my problem with that. I don’t believe for one second they are defective, but if they are, and the “Deep State” is in CYA mode, why even let it get public?

I can't argue with your logic, but all you have to do is look back to the Trump investigation. That was a pretty botched operation by supposedly reputable federal bureaucracies. Apparently government agencies let SW patches happen during the election - that shouldn't happen.

 

[tvolsfan]

Not surprising

 

[hUTch2002]

You can't pump your own gas in New Jersey.

Exactly.

 

[GoBigOrangeUT]

Not surprising

Yeah that pretty much seals it I would think.

 

[hUTch2002]

Isn’t it illegal to pump your own gas in Jersey?

Yep. Therefore it is also illegal to do so while carrying a firearm.

 

[Orangeburst]

The real question would be what margin of error is "acceptable?" Is 100% accurate the answer?

I saw on tv that every vote matter....over an over.

 

[AM64]

You’re right my math is bad. Let’s cut that in half and say +/- 0.25

That's still a whole lot of votes. If my math is right that would be well over a 12,000 vote mismatch in the GA presidential count alone.

 

[NorthDallas40]

If the machines are found to be "defective" either through a programming error or by design, it will cause an unprecedented crisis in this country.

Say it with me now all together


Viva La Banana Republic!

 

[NorthDallas40]

The same ratio over and over and over?

Yep she claimed that in one of the video links you posted yesterday evening.

 

[Vol737]

In a rural county that is 70% Trump. No fraud, just incompetence by the repubs in the county.

Idk, but my larger point is with the technology of today, none of this should be happening in any district. I’m sure there’s been the same incompetence in largely democratic districts.

 

[1972 Grad]

Say it with me now all together


Viva La Banana Republic!

If I'm going to have to live in a banana republic, I might as well move to one with a better climate.

 

[NorthDallas40]

Not surprising

So they examined source code and algorithmic processing? A perfectly fine piece of hardware can run rotten code just fine. Your “not surprising” is “meaningless”