2020 Presidential Race

[zeppelin128]

 

[Velo Vol]

How will repealing Section 230, in your opinion, stop big tech from publishing their own content alongside Mindy Robinson et. al?

Of all the crazy takes that the Trump era has brought us, the Section 230 ones are among the worst.

 

[NorthDallas40]

How will repealing Section 230, in your opinion, stop big tech from publishing their own content alongside Mindy Robinson et. al?

Why should they be allowed to modify the content of Mindy’s post at all and retain 230 protection? After all editorial actions are a part of the content publisher bag of tricks.

Why not just leave Mindy’s post alone if it violates no laws?

 

[OHvol40]

If you love binders, this post is for you!

 

[RockyTop85]

Of all the crazy takes that the Trump era has brought us, the Section 230 ones are among the worst.

Josh Hawley tweeting about corporate marxists is tops for me.

But I am old enough to remember when Section 230 was the basis for holding big tech accountable once they started moderating content and anybody who said it doesn’t work that way was an idiot evil libtard. I didn’t notice when it switched but I’m curious how this new repeal theory is supposed to play out.

 

[NorthDallas40]

Of all the crazy takes that the Trump era has brought us, the Section 230 ones are among the worst.

Editorial actions fall under the publisher actions too tweet boi

 

[OldVolMan]

Of all the crazy takes that the Trump era has brought us, the Section 230 ones are among the worst.

He tried to stop it but rinos of course did not support him, sold out of course as usual.

GOP & Dems Join Forces Against Trump, Plan to Pass Defense Bill Without Section 230 Repeal

 

[NorthDallas40]

Josh Hawley tweeting about corporate marxists is tops for me.

But I am old enough to remember when Section 230 was the basis for holding big tech accountable once they started moderating content and anybody who said it doesn’t work that way was an idiot evil libtard. I didn’t notice when it switched but I’m curious how this new repeal theory is supposed to play out.

I’m old enough to remember that many said they should stay out of the way and not moderate discussions or content at all that violate no laws.

 

[AM64]

No. Their key witness at the Four Seasons Landscaping debacle is a convicted sex offender who doesn’t even live in Pennsylvania. It doesn’t matter to them because all they want is the sound bite since they know their base will take everything they say at face value with no further consideration

Man featured at Giuliani press conference is a convicted sex offender

I could have sworn a couple of weeks ago your side was ranting about restoring rights - to include voting - to felons who served their time in prison. Is this all ex-convicts or just some ex-convicts?

 

[Bassmaster_Vol]

 

[RavinDave]

Her?

She's awesome.

 

[Orangeburst]

Why should they be allowed to modify the content of Mindy’s post at all and retain 230 protection? After all editorial actions are a part of the content publisher bag of tricks.

Why not just leave Mindy’s post alone if it violates no laws?

 

[AM64]

There is no doubt that fraud has occurred. You haven't even tried to explain away the irregularities and you haven't listened at all to the witnesses and yet you are dismissing the idea that fraud took place.

Again, what is the most susceptible voting method to fraud? Is it not mail in balloting? It is, as people from both parties have been saying for decades. We had more mail in votes this year than ever before, and the democrats literally filed litigation to allow for this and also to seek less accountability in these voting methods. Further, in spite of having the most mail in ballots than ever before, the rejection rate was far less than ever before. The rejection rate for mail in ballots in GA in 2016 was over 6%. This year, the rejection rate, in spite of there being far more mail in ballots, was .2%. Explain that.

Further, explain why every "mistake" that they have found favored Biden. Every one. You would think that if these "glitches" were accidents, then some would have favored Trump. But no, they have all favored Biden. I'm sure that's just coincidence.

We could go on and on with other irregularities that indicate fraud. You just continue to dismiss them for no reason other than you do not want it to be true, or you don't care.

Dems like their polls where you take a small sample size and extrapolate the crap out of it to project how the nation feels. Funny thing is that a couple of days ago in an upstate NY location they discovered 55 uncounted ballots; 11 voters were apparently unregistered. That's 20%, but I have the feeling no dem is about to touch that sample - they'll just live with the lie that the rejection rate was .2% rather than 20% ... hypocrites that they are.

 

[OldVolMan]

Because one is about control of the people and the other one is about control of the votes

 

[zeppelin128]

I could have sworn a couple of weeks ago your side was ranting about restoring rights - to include voting - to felons who served their time in prison. Is this all ex-convicts or just some ex-convicts?

Everything I've seen about restoring voting rights to felons from both sides only includes non-violent felons. I think previous sex offender would not fall under that caveat.

 

[RockyTop85]

Why should they be allowed to modify the content of Mindy’s post at all and retain 230 protection? After all editorial actions are a part of the content publisher bag of tricks.

Why not just leave Mindy’s post alone if it violates no laws?

Is this an answer to my question? Like are you saying that repealing Section 230 will mean they are liable for anything anybody says on their property?

 

[Rifleman]

Of all the crazy takes that the Trump era has brought us, the Section 230 ones are among the worst.

It is probably as dumb as California's "let's close the beaches and playgrounds during a pandemic" nonsense.

 

[***RoadVol***]

Shot records for vaccines have been around for decades.

 

[Velo Vol]

I didn’t notice when it switched but I’m curious how this new repeal theory is supposed to play out.

I think it started when Trump got mad at Twitter because his "good news" was never trending, only the "bad" stories.

 

[loggervol]

He's poking fun of people falling for scams?????
Now that's funny, I don't care who you are.

He's probably already used the election of Obama twice. I'm sure that's what you're talking about.??

 

[NorthDallas40]

Is this an answer to my question? Like are you saying that repealing Section 230 will mean they are liable for anything anybody says on their property?

No it’s pointing out your question was narrowed to fit your gotcha scenario... as usual. Content editing falls under a publishers umbrella also and by adding that tag line they needlessly edited Mindy’s post and acted as a publisher. They don’t have to publish their own content along side. You’re smart enough to know that... right?

 

[VolinWayne]

For anyone who thinks these hearings are unbiased, watch this video. Those reps are embarrassing and do not represent the people of their state

Absolutely true statement. I thought the one today in Ga went pretty well and was well run.

 

[RockyTop85]

No it’s pointing out your question was narrowed to fit your gotcha scenario... as usual. Content editing falls under a publishers umbrella also abs by adding that tag line they edited Mindy’s post and acted as a publisher. They don’t have to publish their own content along side. You’re smart enough to know that... right?

No it wasn’t an answer to my question. That would have sufficed.

 

[AM64]

Again places like Nashville will ticket and in some cases arrest people for not wearing a mask. 99.9999999% of the people are walking around with the mask. Why are there still cases in these places?

Not all masks are created equal - some are a joke; and a lot of people don't have a clue (or just don't care) about how to wear a mask properly.

 

[NorthDallas40]

Shot records for vaccines have been around for decades.

Thanks for proving his point. Shot records for COVID are ok and an acceptable means to control a citizens movement or access to things like public education but a voter ID is needless oppression?