DC_Vol
Bush league poster
- Joined
- Sep 13, 2008
- Messages
- 22,356
- Likes
- 42,024
Great read. And he’s spot on. Luther hates him. Primarily bc he has always said if you can afford to put your kids in private schools, and still have them in public, that it child abuse.The only way that’s happening is by revamping the tax system entirely and we both know that ain’t happening anytime soon. There’s a book out called the fair tax by Neal Boortz which would make everything more equitable for all income brackets
You didn't answer the question. You seem to think it's okay for you to benefit from those laws, but not for those more fortunate financially. Why? It seems you have two standards. So the question is why should their be separate standards?Different people benefit from different parts of the tax law because people and their situations are different. You don't think that I benefit from every tax law that other's benefit from do you?
I shot Neal Boortz in a virtual reality game we were playing at Dave and Buster's back in the late 80's.The only way that’s happening is by revamping the tax system entirely and we both know that ain’t happening anytime soon. There’s a book out called the fair tax by Neal Boortz which would make everything more equitable for all income brackets
That, and he went out of his way to constantly use the term "government schools". He did his best to portray public education as a complete failure. There was absolutely no positive outcome of his BS. His only goal was to damage the public's perception of public education. In the grand scheme....he did far more harm than good. (at least in regards to public education)Great read. And he’s spot on. Luther hates him. Primarily bc he has always said if you can afford to put your kids in private schools, and still have them in public, that it child abuse.
That, and he went out of his way to constantly use the term "government schools". He did his best to portray public education as a complete failure. There was absolutely no positive outcome of his BS. His only goal was to damage the public's perception of public education. In the grand scheme....he did far more harm than good. (at least in regards to public education)
He was all for pro-choice and gay rights but he wouldn't talk about that because his snow flake audience didn't want to hear it.
What laws? I have no idea what you are talking about.You didn't answer the question. You seem to think it's okay for you to benefit from those laws, but not for those more fortunate financially. Why? It seems you have two standards. So the question is why should their be separate standards?
That, and he went out of his way to constantly use the term "government schools". He did his best to portray public education as a complete failure. There was absolutely no positive outcome of his BS. His only goal was to damage the public's perception of public education. In the grand scheme....he did far more harm than good. (at least in regards to public education)
He was all for pro-choice and gay rights but he wouldn't talk about that because his snow flake audience didn't want to hear it.
You're so wrong, but you'll never know. Neal has forgotten more about education than I'll ever know? That's got to be one of the most ignorant statements ever.And he’s spot on, my wife has been a teacher over 25 years and she concurs. Neal has forgotten more about education than you’ll ever know, the statistics back him up. What did they just say about the schools in Baltimore ? 23 schools and not ONE kid proficient in math, sorry the truth hurts but if you really cared and weren’t just there for a paycheck you’d agree with Neal.