2020 Presidential Race

#13,002
#13,002
FLVOL69 said:
The only way that’s happening is by revamping the tax system entirely and we both know that ain’t happening anytime soon. There’s a book out called the fair tax by Neal Boortz which would make everything more equitable for all income brackets
Click to expand...
Great read. And he’s spot on. Luther hates him. Primarily bc he has always said if you can afford to put your kids in private schools, and still have them in public, that it child abuse.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: FLVOL69 and hjeagle1vol
#13,005
#13,005
luthervol said:
Different people benefit from different parts of the tax law because people and their situations are different. You don't think that I benefit from every tax law that other's benefit from do you?
Click to expand...
You didn't answer the question. You seem to think it's okay for you to benefit from those laws, but not for those more fortunate financially. Why? It seems you have two standards. So the question is why should their be separate standards?
 
#13,009
#13,009
FLVOL69 said:
The only way that’s happening is by revamping the tax system entirely and we both know that ain’t happening anytime soon. There’s a book out called the fair tax by Neal Boortz which would make everything more equitable for all income brackets
Click to expand...
I shot Neal Boortz in a virtual reality game we were playing at Dave and Buster's back in the late 80's.
 
#13,010
#13,010
volfanhill said:
Great read. And he’s spot on. Luther hates him. Primarily bc he has always said if you can afford to put your kids in private schools, and still have them in public, that it child abuse.
Click to expand...
That, and he went out of his way to constantly use the term "government schools". He did his best to portray public education as a complete failure. There was absolutely no positive outcome of his BS. His only goal was to damage the public's perception of public education. In the grand scheme....he did far more harm than good. (at least in regards to public education)
He was all for pro-choice and gay rights but he wouldn't talk about that because his snow flake audience didn't want to hear it.
 
#13,011
#13,011
luthervol said:
That, and he went out of his way to constantly use the term "government schools". He did his best to portray public education as a complete failure. There was absolutely no positive outcome of his BS. His only goal was to damage the public's perception of public education. In the grand scheme....he did far more harm than good. (at least in regards to public education)
He was all for pro-choice and gay rights but he wouldn't talk about that because his snow flake audience didn't want to hear it.
Click to expand...

Perhaps he suspected the public schools are filled with Luthers.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FLVOL69
#13,012
#13,012
Weezer said:
You didn't answer the question. You seem to think it's okay for you to benefit from those laws, but not for those more fortunate financially. Why? It seems you have two standards. So the question is why should their be separate standards?
Click to expand...
What laws? I have no idea what you are talking about.
I thought 79 was pissed because I got tax exemptions for my children which he didn't get because he had no children and that that was the basis for this discussion.

Plus.....the people who are more fortunate financially benefit from many tax laws of which the less fortunate are unable to take advantage.
For me, it always has and always will boil down to an equitable sharing of the burden.
 
#13,015
#13,015
luthervol said:
That, and he went out of his way to constantly use the term "government schools". He did his best to portray public education as a complete failure. There was absolutely no positive outcome of his BS. His only goal was to damage the public's perception of public education. In the grand scheme....he did far more harm than good. (at least in regards to public education)
He was all for pro-choice and gay rights but he wouldn't talk about that because his snow flake audience didn't want to hear it.
Click to expand...

And he’s spot on, my wife has been a teacher over 25 years and she concurs. Neal has forgotten more about education than you’ll ever know, the statistics back him up. What did they just say about the schools in Baltimore ? 23 schools and not ONE kid proficient in math, sorry the truth hurts but if you really cared and weren’t just there for a paycheck you’d agree with Neal.
 
  • Like
Reactions: marcusluvsvols, SpaceCoastVol and tennvols77
#13,017
#13,017
FLVOL69 said:
And he’s spot on, my wife has been a teacher over 25 years and she concurs. Neal has forgotten more about education than you’ll ever know, the statistics back him up. What did they just say about the schools in Baltimore ? 23 schools and not ONE kid proficient in math, sorry the truth hurts but if you really cared and weren’t just there for a paycheck you’d agree with Neal.
Click to expand...
You're so wrong, but you'll never know. Neal has forgotten more about education than I'll ever know? That's got to be one of the most ignorant statements ever.
I could give you a list of 100's of students from my area alone who have received full rides to the top universities in the nation. The problems aren't with public education, a fact which any thinking person would understand.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top