2020 Presidential Race

No different than your side foisting a BS insurance policy to explain why you got your ass handed to you.

Don’t be an uncultured, “used” tube sock.
That there is no difference between the two parties when it comes to not wanting to face the results of a bitter defeat, was my point. If you think Trump would have handled a defeat gracefully, all evidence points to the contrary. He would have called the election rigged, and he would have blamed it all on illegal immigrant voters and he would have never acknowledged the defeat.... That is just who he is.
 
That there is no difference between the two parties when it comes to not wanting to face the results of a bitter defeat, was my point. If you think Trump would have handled a defeat gracefully, all evidence points to the contrary. He would have called the election rigged, and he would have blamed it all on illegal immigrant voters and he would have never acknowledged the defeat.... That is just who he is.
I agree that Trump probably would have, but not the majority of the Republican party. I doubt they expected him to win. When Hillary lost, the Democratic party lost their minds.
 
...but that wasn't what Trump was talking about when he kept saying "The system is rigged, folks!". He was trying to undermine the legitimacy of the Presidential general election in case he lost. It was an ego driven display of immaturity.... and also very bad for the country!
I don’t know what you’re talking about. It was Democrats who have been undermining the results of a democratic election. MUH Russia! A complete hoax! Very bad for the country
 
  • Like
Reactions: tennvols77
Didn't Donald Trump spend much of the 2016 Presidential campaign telling his supporters to not trust the results of the election (if he lost) ? "The system if rigged, folks!" was a persistently spoken line from Trump during his campaign rallies throughout September and October of 2016. It wasn't meant as a joke, either. Trump's purpose was to undermine the legitimacy of the election and to cast doubt on the validity of the results, so in case he lost, the defeat wouldn't hurt his brand image with his supporters. It was very selfish and egotistical of him.
Didn't Obama say our elections couldn't be hacked? It's a double-edge sword that swings both ways.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tennvols77
...but that wasn't what Trump was talking about when he kept saying "The system is rigged, folks!". He was trying to undermine the legitimacy of the Presidential general election in case he lost. It was an ego driven display of immaturity.... and also very bad for the country!
So why do you continue to ignore the misdeeds of the left while continuing with "but Trump"? I agree with you that Trump is a shady mofo, but does that excuse the left somehow? I don't think so.
 
So why do you continue to ignore the misdeeds of the left while continuing with "but Trump"? I agree with you that Trump is a shady mofo, but does that excuse the left somehow? I don't think so.
I fail to see how Trump is any different than the crooked politicians that came before him.
It’s SSDD.

Give me a crooked capitalist over a crooked socialist any day of the week and twice on Sunday. With the crooked capitalist I still have a shot at making a good living. With any socialists I’m sol
 
I fail to see how Trump is any different than the crooked politicians that came before him.
It’s SSDD.

Give me a crooked capitalist over a crooked socialist any day of the week and twice on Sunday. With the crooked capitalist I still have a shot at making a good living. With any socialists I’m sol
He's not. I consider him a shady mofo, but I consider all politicians shady mofos.
 
  • Like
Reactions: McDad
Lmao
images
 
  • Like
Reactions: norrislakevol
Poles, Poles, Poles

New Fox Poll shows Biden, Harris, and Warren besting Trump. MSM salivating this morning.

Fox News Poll 8/15

With any political pole, your methodology should include party or independent identification. Otherwise, you could just call the haters or likers and invalidate the pole. So I wanted to look into why Dems are typically sampled at higher rates, especially since we are such a closely divided nation.

There is no way Harris would beat Trump, so looking at the pole on page 19, they sampled self identified Dems at 8 points greater, and only 12% who identify as Independent. A 12% Independent rate seems inappropriately low and seems to fly in the face of conventional wisdom. Ironically enough I have to cite another pole to clarify party affiliation since 2004. This seems to more appropriately represent the constituency, with Dems holding a slight lead. Even the Independent leans are fairly even.

Party Affiliation

My conclusion, poles are bunk.
 
I agree that Trump probably would have, but not the majority of the Republican party. I doubt they expected him to win. When Hillary lost, the Democratic party lost their minds.
Give me a break. If Hillary Clinton had won, there would have been just as many investigations led by House Republicans including Devin Nunes. Look back at the campaign. There would have been no difference at all. There would have also been a movement to impeach her by now.
 
Because I am financially investing in the future of this nation to a much greater degree than are you.
The human species will propagate just fine without your participation. You should not be given financial incentive to do so. It is completely wrong. THe same thing can be said about single filers. They shouldn't have tp pay more. IT goes to the heart of your ******** about 'fairness'.

YOU should be paying more than I because you are taxing the infrastructure, causing more pollution, etc etc etc.

And if you are really stupid enough to try that financial contribution argument, then stfu with your pllution taxes and things like that.
 
The human species will propagate just fine without your participation. You should not be given financial incentive to do so. It is completely wrong. THe same thing can be said about single filers. They shouldn't have tp pay more. IT goes to the heart of your ******** about 'fairness'.

YOU should be paying more than I because you are taxing the infrastructure, causing more pollution, etc etc etc.

And if you are really stupid enough to try that financial contribution argument, then stfu with your pllution taxes and things like that.
It goes a tad beyond the human species propagating itself; but don't worry. I and mine will contribute far more than you and yours.
 
Give me a break. If Hillary Clinton had won, there would have been just as many investigations led by House Republicans including Devin Nunes. Look back at the campaign. There would have been no difference at all. There would have also been a movement to impeach her by now.

There wouldn't have been a special council, the press would have shouted down any congressional inquiry into Hillary and basically it would have been business as usual.
 
It goes a tad beyond the human species propagating itself; but don't worry. I and mine will contribute far more than you and yours.
Looks like we have a financial pissing war in the making. So Luther why don't just tell us how much you and yours contribute to the national coffers so we can all measure our penis next to yours?
 
Looks like we have a financial pissing war in the making. So Luther why don't just tell us how much you and yours contribute to the national coffers so we can all measure our penis next to yours?
I find it telling that you would ask me when it's Spacecoast who first made the comparisons.....multiple times, yet amazingly enough, you never asked him.
 
I find it telling that you would ask me when it's Spacecoast who first made the comparisons.....multiple times, yet amazingly enough, you never asked him.
It seemed to me that you were the one doing the bragging not him, but if it makes you feel better spacecoast you need to tell us how much money you make.
 
It seemed to me that you were the one doing the bragging not him, but if it makes you feel better spacecoast you need to tell us how much money you make.
Nope. Ain't gonna happen. Sorry. I will tell you that Trump's tax policy saved me $20,000 over what I would have paid under the Messiah.

But I will tell you this much. I made as much trading stock as I did on my W2. Thanks again to... Oba... Mr Trump.
 
Nope. Ain't gonna happen. Sorry. I will tell you that Trump's tax policy saved me $20,000 over what I would have paid under the Messiah.

But I will tell you this much. I made as much trading stock as I did on my W2. Thanks again to... Oba... Mr Trump.
But Luther pays much more into society than you do. How can you justify your decadent lifestyle while so many are suffering for being lazy?
 
Sorry Elton John, your record's not still standing: Fire marshal says Donald Trump's boast that he Smashed pop star's Attendance Record at MAGA arena is TRUE

Donald Trump's claim that his Thursday night campaign rally broke a longstanding attendance record is true, according to the fire department official who supervised the crowd-counting.

'Great news!' the president tweeted after returning from the Southern New Hampshire University Arena to his New Jersey golf resort. 'Tonight, we broke the all-time attendance record previously held by Elton John at #SNHUArena in Manchester, New Hampshire!'

17370766-7365155-image-a-26_1565988243208.jpg


Manchester Deputy Fire Marshal Mitchell Cady told DailyMail.com that Trump was right – that his crowd numbered 'just over 11,500.'

Calling the president's tweet 'a topic of discussion around here,' Cady revealed that 'the arena staff said Elton John was around 11,300' in April 2004.

Cady also said his office estimated that at least 8,000 people stood outside the arena in an overflow crowd area, watching the rally on jumbo TV screens.

17370758-7365155-image-a-38_1565988414531.jpg


17371068-7365155-image-a-42_1565988790039.jpg


'We weren't counting it,' he said of the outside crowd, 'but we estimated probably in the area of 8,000 to 9,000 out front.'

Fire marshal says Donald Trump DID smash Elton John's attendance record at New Hampshire arena | Daily Mail Online
 
Give me a break. If Hillary Clinton had won, there would have been just as many investigations led by House Republicans including Devin Nunes. Look back at the campaign. There would have been no difference at all. There would have also been a movement to impeach her by now.
Look at it however you want, you're still saying it's okay for one side to do it but not the other. Now ask yourself how much sense that makes? None.
 

VN Store



Back
Top