BigOrangeD
Got Bitcoin?
- Joined
- Feb 13, 2010
- Messages
- 26,636
- Likes
- 20,652
Pete has already qualified for the September and October debates, so he isn't going anywhere anytime soon.Mayor Pete Should Probably Drop Out Already
![]()
Many agree that there are way too many white dudes running for president in the Democratic primary. As the third round of debates draws near, some Democrats are beginning to wonder why some of the low-polling vanity candidates shouldn't quit the presidential race and run for a statewide office they might actually have a shot at winning.
Buttigieg is the ideal vanity candidate for rich white liberals with graduate degrees. He dominates in the "boat shoe" strongholds of Nantucket, Martha's Vineyard, and Cape Cod. He speaks obscure languages and plays the didgeridoo, because of course he does. And yet he's still trailing frontrunner Joe Biden by 25 points, according to the Real Clear Politics polling average. In fact, Mayor Pete is only a couple points ahead of Beto at this point. The latest Fox News poll has him tied with Andrew Yang at 3 percent.
Buttigieg doesn't have to stay in Indiana and run for governor, but if Democrats are interested in aggressively winnowing the enormous field of presidential candidates, what exactly is the point of keeping Buttigieg over Yang? Why not just accept the fact that they're probably going to be stuck with Biden and hope he doesn't blow it like Hillary did?
Mayor Pete Should Probably Drop Out Already
From what I'm seeing some top programmers are bugging out of Google and expressing their dismay at Google's practices after the super secret squirrel program for China and their censorship requirements came to light. People aren't digging Google right now.Point of privilege.
What report is (gender neutral pronoun) talking about?
Pete has already qualified for the September and October debates, so he isn't going anywhere anytime soon.
He's in fifth in every major poll, including the latest poll out of Iowa that has him one point behind the Bern. Pretty impressive for a candidate that is still not very well known nationally. He should not drop out, and if he does it won't be until the Spring.
He's been living in Iowa for the past several days and it will have positive results for him. He's also building his nationwide campaign infrastructure and getting staff on the ground in Iowa and New Hampshire.
I'm not sold on Biden, I think he will begin to lose support over the next few months. It is anyone from the top five's race to win imo. Biden is not a shoe-in.
Pete's support will grow as he meets voters in the early primary states. He's in it for the long haul.
From what I'm seeing some top programmers are bugging out of Google and expressing their dismay at Google's practices after the super secret squirrel program for China and their censorship requirements came to light. People aren't digging Google right now.
I believe propaganda for Hillary tops the chart on this report and that it altered voters. I may disagree with the numbers though. I think they are high and i want to know the reports methodology and survey strength.
Bro..Pete has as much chance of winning as the ghost of Freddy Mercury doesPete has already qualified for the September and October debates, so he isn't going anywhere anytime soon.
He's in fifth in every major poll, including the latest poll out of Iowa that has him one point behind the Bern. Pretty impressive for a candidate that is still not very well known nationally. He should not drop out, and if he does it won't be until the Spring.
He's been living in Iowa for the past several days and it will have positive results for him. He's also building his nationwide campaign infrastructure and getting staff on the ground in Iowa and New Hampshire.
I'm not sold on Biden, I think he will begin to lose support over the next few months. It is anyone from the top five's race to win imo. Biden is not a shoe-in.
Pete's support will grow as he meets voters in the early primary states. He's in it for the long haul.
Idiot leftists using google to answer all of their questions > facebook memes. To think otherwise is intellectually dishonestFor the record, "Judicial Watch" is by their own self-description, "a conservative foundation". By the descriptions of others, they are an ultra-conservative troll organization that files FOIA lawsuits to investigate claimed misconduct by government officials, who are always Democrats.
A person cannot, with any credibility, suggest that Russia's campaign of influence on social media did not impact the way anyone voted, but then claim that Google's algorithm did. Such beliefs are not consistent with each other. Either voters are influenced by what they read on the internet, or they are not. It's not a "yes" in the case of Google searches, but a "no" in the case of Facebook memes and fake news stories.
If they were already "idiot leftists" to begin with? Then they were never going to vote for Donald Trump in the first place. Those Google searches didn't change the way anyone voted.Idiot leftists using google to answer all of their questions > facebook memes. To think otherwise is intellectually dishonest
Obama chose Biden because of his "experience," due to the fact that Obama had next to none. It was a pick to balance the ticket. The pick was made by Dem higher ups to allay the fears of voters for choosing a man with no resume to speak of.I've seen no evidence of that and I feel confident that Barack Obama would not have selected Biden as a running mate if he believed that he was a racist.
Well-said.For the record, "Judicial Watch" is by their own self-description, "a conservative foundation". By the descriptions of others, they are an ultra-conservative troll organization that files FOIA lawsuits to investigate claimed misconduct by government officials, who are always Democrats.
A person cannot, with any credibility, suggest that Russia's campaign of influence on social media did not impact the way anyone voted, but then claim that Google's algorithm did. Such beliefs are not consistent with each other. Either voters are influenced by what they read on the internet, or they are not. It's not a "yes" in the case of Google searches, but a "no" in the case of Facebook memes and fake news stories.
I'm influenced by what I read on VN PF.For the record, "Judicial Watch" is by their own self-description, "a conservative foundation". By the descriptions of others, they are an ultra-conservative troll organization that files FOIA lawsuits to investigate claimed misconduct by government officials, who are always Democrats.
A person cannot, with any credibility, suggest that Russia's campaign of influence on social media did not impact the way anyone voted, but then claim that Google's algorithm did. Such beliefs are not consistent with each other. Either voters are influenced by what they read on the internet, or they are not. It's not a "yes" in the case of Google searches, but a "no" in the case of Facebook memes and fake news stories.
Biden is often clumsy as a public speaker. You can choose to interpret his gaffes and poorly structured sentences literally and make the presumption if you want. It is a superficial way to judge someone though.I consider it racism when a white person implies that it is rare to find a clean, articulate black man.
True or False