Stoerner Fumbles
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 30, 2017
- Messages
- 4,405
- Likes
- 26,349
Something has been trickling out to Katz/Lunardi. I mentioned this earlier in the week, but a few of the TV bracketheads have been showing us in the East. As BTO observed that doesn’t match the curve. It might have to do with organizing the brackets to avoid rematch rules. As more SEC teams qualify, it’s harder to avoid the rematch funnel.
Naa. I’ve just gotten to the point where it doesn’t really matter where we get placed. There are a few teams in the 7-10 range that I’m hoping to avoid. That feels like the more relevant focus for us. Not trying to dictate what anyone else does though.Would you rather we sit around for the next 7 days and complain about how much we suck and have no chance to beat a 15 seed? Projecting how we match up in the 2nd weekend feels a lot more fun with how little time we may have left.
Classic Lunardi. If Auburn wins and the Committee hasn’t decided to pack it up and start drinking, they’ll be a 3. But if the Committee decides it’s 5:00 somewhere, a win won’t matter.
If we get the last 1 seed over UNC, we need to send DJ Burns some NIL money.I just read a story on Yahoo that we were still in play for the #1 seed on strength of wins vs the Net top 25 and lack of losses to non-NCAA teams. It actually said Iowa State was in contention for it as well as North Carolina. It pointed out that each had multiple worse losses than we did and fared worse vs the elite teams.