Yea it doesn't matter who potus is. Six months no biggie. No one in charge, and accountable, for the decisions of that office. You sound like an idiot. Stop. Pause. Take your own political feelings out. Take trump out of the equation. Then ask yourself did you say something remotely sane? You did not.As long as Biden has no official responsibilities, no authority of any kind or decision-making input. Of course, no nuclear football .... and is basically just a photo op figurehead for 6 months? I don't think that's a big deal. It's certainly not unprecedented either.
The answer to my question is ZERO. The presumptive nominee, Hubert Humphrey, did not compete in any primaries in 1968 and due to Robert Kennedy's murder in June, nobody had enough delegates to garner the nomination. Humphrey owed his nomination entirely to party bosses who controlled Robert Kennedy's delegates. This would not be unprecedented at all.
So we are all in agreement that he should not be running for another term?!?!?Yea it doesn't matter who potus is. Six months no biggie. No one in charge, and accountable, for the decisions of that office. You sound like an idiot. Stop. Pause. Take your own political feelings out. Take trump out of the equation. Then ask yourself did you say something remotely sane? You did not.
It’s not a matter of “better”.So deciding he can finish his term but not serve another one would be a better decision than deciding to stay in the race?????
It doesn't have to mean any of those things, and whether you realize it or not .... and you probably don't - it has happened before. Kamala Harris would be in charge and accountable - just as George Bush would have been in 1988 when Reagan was mostly in his jammies and watching Gunsmoke reruns.Yea it doesn't matter who potus is. Six months no biggie. No one in charge, and accountable, for the decisions of that office. You sound like an idiot. Stop. Pause. Take your own political feelings out. Take trump out of the equation. Then ask yourself did you say something remotely sane? You did not.
Correct. And he should be removed today. Looking forward to the cowards in your party demanding it. They won't though. Bc what six month doesn't matter? Seriously that thought process has to be the dumbest thing uttered in here.So we are all in agreement that he should not be running for another term?!?!?
Yea you keep mentioning that and then leaving out his Chief of staffs opinion of ONE cabinet members accusation. You are being dishonest or intentionally negligent on that front. Baker disagreedIt doesn't have to mean any of those things, and whether you realize it or not .... and you probably don't - it has happened before. Kamala Harris would be in charge andd accountable - just as George Bush would have been in 1988 when Reagan was mostly in his jammies and watching Gunsmoke reruns.
I don’t think Biden is fit for breakfast in the morning. I imagine his handlers are gonna have to change his diapers and dope him up to start the day. That’s neither here nor there.Do you think Biden is fit for another four year term?
Yeah. I would love to see conservatives making this argument if Trump starts chewing on his tongue and pissing his pants in August of 2028.Yea it doesn't matter who potus is. Six months no biggie. No one in charge, and accountable, for the decisions of that office. You sound like an idiot. Stop. Pause. Take your own political feelings out. Take trump out of the equation. Then ask yourself did you say something remotely sane? You did not.
Gonna double down on that Soviet Union thing, eh? Brilliant.Luthervol and his ilk are enemies of the USA.
Trying to circumvent the legal process of our country to advance their anti American agenda
And it shouldn’t be that hard for you to see that:So we are obviously in agreement that Biden should not be the '24 nominee.
We can finally move away from that nonsense.
Leading you guys to that admission shouldn't have been that difficult.
Lol you keep getting right up to the correct answer and then jump away on purpose.So we are obviously in agreement that Biden should not be the '24 nominee.
We can finally move away from that nonsense.
Leading you guys to that admission shouldn't have been that difficult.
Are Harris, Schumer, Pelosi, Obama, and Clinton negligent for not calling for his removal today? Maybe you give a pass for Obama and Clinton since they aren't currently elected officials. But where is the Dem leadership?So we are obviously in agreement that Biden should not be the '24 nominee.
We can finally move away from that nonsense.
Leading you guys to that admission shouldn't have been that difficult.
Oh.You guys are so simple.
You bitch about the will of the voters not being followed while claiming he shouldn't serve one more day.
The hilarious thing is you don't see how absurd your position is.
I'm not sure. If they feel he is incapable, then they certainly should invoke the 25th.Are Harris, Schumer, Pelosi, Obama, and Clinton negligent for not calling for his removal today? Maybe you give a pass for Obama and Clinton since they aren't currently elected officials. But where is the Dem leadership?
Harris has proven herself unqualified for not speaking out
There is not a whole lot of self-awareness going on here with what Trump tried to do to Biden 4 years ago. LOL.You guys are so simple.
You bitch about the will of the voters not being followed while claiming he shouldn't serve one more day.
The hilarious thing is you don't see how absurd your position is.
lol you are the absurd one. I don't have any problem with him being removed from this election. He needs to be out today. Your party wants to have their cake and eat it too. Remove him but let him serve for 6 months is not a sane persons option. Call your party out. It's bs. Your party has had zero discussion about his removalYou guys are so simple.
You bitch about the will of the voters not being followed while claiming he shouldn't serve one more day.
The hilarious thing is you don't see how absurd your position is.
You just argued that a mentally incompetent POTUS was not a big deal if it was just for 6 months. One of the dumber positions I've seen someone take.There is not a whole lot of self-awareness going on here with what Trump tried to do to Biden 4 years ago. LOL.
Their arguments are completely specific to the moment .... while inconvenient recollections of the Republican Party antics of 2020 are never made.
Yeah. It’s almost as if we are discussing this particular issue, while not bringing something that doesn’t have anything to do with this issue into the conversation.There is not a whole lot of self-awareness going on here with what Trump tried to do to Biden 4 years ago. LOL.
Their arguments are completely specific to the moment .... while inconvenient recollections of the Republican Party antics of 2020 are never made.
I argued that there is nothing wrong with allowing Biden to simply be a figurehead with no responsibility for 6 months. In reality, that is likely what he has already been for at least 2 years anyway. He is seldom seen. Never conducts press conferences or meets with world leaders outside of NATO.You just argued that mentally incompetent POTUS was not a big deal if it was just for 6 months. One of the dumber positions I've seen someone take rl