ButchPlz
We do a little trollin'
- Joined
- Aug 27, 2014
- Messages
- 20,712
- Likes
- 41,135
... and the Democrats have nothing to do with the current words of Republicans.You keep wanting to make it about the Republicans, which is understandable.
But it’s the Democrats, and their messaging tear they went on - coupled with their actions, now.
The Republicans have nothing to do with the Democrats prior messaging, and current actions.
I didn't say that it was inaccurate. It's not.How is this not accurate? Do you have any say in who the candidate is?
![]()
New York Times Board Wants Kamala Harris Out of the Race
The New York Times editorial board wants VP Kamala Harris off the 2024 ticket because of "profound concerns" about her electability.www.breitbart.com
Anybody who even suggests the possibility that the Democrats would put 2 white guys on their ticket is delusional and doesn't understand the current Dem party. Let's get in the real worldPick the white guys over the black VP. Hypocrites.
Explaining why someone's outrage is obviously insincere, is not a what-about-ism.Whataboutism is one of his pillars.
Agreed. No one votes for the VP. Wouldn't even make sense to.Anybody who even suggests the possibility that the Democrats would put 2 white guys on their ticket is delusional and doesn't understand the current Dem party. Let's get in the real world
It will 100% be Kamala. The only question is who her running mate will be and it really won't make a difference. When was the last time that a running mate made a difference in a Presidential race? It doesn't happen
Who do you think your party will tell you to vote for? Kamala, or someone else?Explaining why someone's outrage is obviously insincere, is not a what-about-ism.
Plain and simply put ....
Donald Trump's supporters obviously do not care if an election that Joe Biden truly won is overturned in an underhanded manner. It's what they tried like hell to do themselves.
If I had to put money on it .... I would say Kamala Harris.Who do you think your party will tell you to vote for? Kamala, or someone else?
I agree it's probably Kamala because I could see her easily agreeing to be the puppet of Democrat leadership. But I also don't think she beats Trump. If the Dems really want to win, I think they need to make a better choice.If I had to put money on it .... I would say Kamala Harris.
I would much rather have just about anyone else. As I have said, my dream ticket would be :
Gov. Andy Beshear (Kentucky) ............... President
Gov. Roy Cooper (North Carolina .......... Vice President
.... but that is probably more of a pipe dream than a dream.
I don't see votes being cast. Are they going to call every single registered Democrat and ask them who they want? Of course not. So let's stop pretending this is being done in some democratic way. Party leadership will make the decision, and they'll most likely pick someone they can easily control. Someone like Kamala.They're waiting to hear more from the voters. Once the voters make their wishes clear, the party will know which direction to take.
But the bottom line is really very simple................ANYBODY BUT tRUMP
I agree .... but I think Democrats have options that can win.I agree it's probably Kamala because I could see her easily agreeing to be the puppet of Democrat leadership. But I also don't think she beats Trump. If the Dems really want to win, I think they need to make a better choice.
Glad to see there are no limits to the compromises you’re willing to make so Trump won’t be the choice. It’s almost like you don’t have beliefs or values.Cry us the Amazon River ....
A democratic system of elections is not supposed to involve a President pressuring his Vice President into refusing to call electoral college votes into roll from states that they lost, during the formal process of certification.
Republicans have no moral high ground on which to stand here, unless they were critical of Donald Trump's antics 4 years ago. Jesse Watters of Fox News had numerous opportunities to voice such criticism, but he never did.