RavinDave
911 or Bust
- Joined
- Sep 20, 2017
- Messages
- 12,207
- Likes
- 18,436
In the debate, if Kamala chooses to engage in Stormy talk that he reminds her she was the side chick for a 60 year old.Where’s all the Trump haters that hate him for having some side chicks? Oh he’s a POS husband, father blah blah blah don’t trust him blah blah. Well let’s see, you will be voting for the “ side chick”. How do you think she got into politics?![]()
Isn't the democratic process designed to reflect the will of the people?
Kamala Harris is in favor of reparations for descendants of slaves. This alienates 85% of the country.
Ms. Harris’s views on race likewise put her outside the mainstream. Wait until someone in Mr. Trump’s inner circle reminds him that his opponent supports slavery reparations. As a senator, Ms. Harris co-sponsored a bill introduced by fellow Democrat Cory Booker that would “establish a commission to study the impact of slavery and continuing discrimination against African-Americans and make recommendations on reparation proposals for the descendants of slaves.”
She told Al Sharpton that if she’s elected president and presented with reparations legislation, “I will sign that bill.” A 2022 Pew Research Center survey found that by more than 2 to 1, Americans reject efforts to compensate descendants of slaves.
Loading…
www.wsj.com
I am sorry, but what? do you mean that the US government itself never directly bought slaves?The United States was never involved in the slave trade, so I don't even see how its possible. Now something the U.S. has done was compensate the Japanese Americans for what happen to them during WWII i.e. camps. This is somewhat logical.
Under this logic shouldn't descendants of the people that fought in the Civil War get reparations?
Legally and logically there is nothing that is owed to these people, if anything they owe the U.S.
Speaking of involved, wasn’t her family involved in slave owning. Rough times ahead for those statue cancel culture folks.The United States was never involved in the slave trade, so I don't even see how its possible. Now something the U.S. has done was compensate the Japanese Americans for what happen to them during WWII i.e. camps. This is somewhat logical.
Under this logic shouldn't descendants of the people that fought in the Civil War get reparations?
Legally and logically there is nothing that is owed to these people, if anything they owe the U.S.