2024 Presidential Race

#37,927
#37,927
Caught a snippet of CNN this morning, their group of talking heads were discussing either Oprah or MOs speech (not sure). One of the AA women on the panel said “I was surprised that she was talking to black women, we understand our assignment every 4 years she needed to be talking to other women.”

I was kinda shocked that she admitted it on air.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TN-POSSUM, Vol since 77, whodeycin85 and 2 others
#37,929
#37,929
RDU VOL#14 said:
Bill said that this is the greatest job interview for the world’s greatest job. I’ve never had a job interview where I wasn’t asked a question during the interview. Kamala seems to be the first .
Click to expand...
Her talent is not answering questions or making decisions. Headboard Harris’s talents are related to other areas. Problem is those talents do not translate well to her new job.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Franklin Pierce
#37,931
#37,931
luthervol said:
Give the whole uni-party nonsense a rest. They are as different as they've ever been.
Click to expand...

There are no parties. That is why Trump is a thing, that and nuts like you. The republican leadership and donors did not want Trump as that gives a person a choice which they don't control.
😂

As I mentioned, I don't think you're making much sense... they programmed you to want Trump eliminated for a reason.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LibertyVol
#37,934
#37,934
Majors said:
For timeline clarity. Trump kicked Epstein out in 2007, some 8 years before Virginia spoke about it. Oprah waited until it was a problem.

Another zig zag of what about with Acosta…same Acosta he made resign. Is this the part of the what about you fail to mention Clinton.

Or how about you stay on task…seems you glazed over in your attempt to tie Trump to Epstein you failed to mention the glowing love Oprah had for Trump. Like I said, good to see Oprah on stage talking adversity as a billionaire.
Click to expand...
No, Giuffre went to the police in Florida and was dissuaded from filing charges before Trump banned Epstein from Mar-A-Lago. That is established in the Netflix documentary "Filthy Rich." .... and Trump only made Acosta resign after immense public pressure. Why was Acosta appointed in the first place?

You have a clear double-standard here. You are aggressively defending Trump with a benefit of the doubt ... while making broad and unsubstantiated assumptions of Winfrey. It is obvious partisanship. Your feelings aren't guided by an outrage over sexual assault. Your outrage, and who to direct it towards, is entirely based on politics.

Once again, there is no proof that either Donald Trump or Oprah Winfrey had knowledge of what Epstein and Weinstein were doing, and I have no problem giving them both the benefit of the doubt over what hasn't been proven.
 
#37,936
#37,936
BowlBrother85 said:
No, Giuffre went to the police in Florida and was dissuaded from filing charges before Trump banned Epstein from Mar-A-Lago. That is established in the Netflix documentary "Filthy Rich." .... and Trump only made Acosta resign after immense public pressure. Why was Acosta appointed in the first place?

You have a clear double-standard here. You are aggressively defending Trump with a benefit of the doubt ... while making broad and unsubstantiated assumptions of Winfrey. It is obvious partisanship. Your feelings aren't guided by an outrage over sexual assault. Your outrage, and who to direct it towards, is entirely based on politics.

Once again, there is no proof that either Donald Trump or Oprah Winfrey had knowledge of what Epstein and Weinstein were doing, and I have no problem giving them both the benefit of the doubt over what hasn't been proven.
Click to expand...
So Trump sees police reports? So again, Trump disassociated well before it was a problem for those associated. Oprah, not so much.

We get it. You’re a rapist sympathizer. Might want to harness that in social settings.
 
#37,944
#37,944
Majors said:
So Trump sees police reports? So again, Trump disassociated well before it was a problem for those associated. Oprah, not so much.
Click to expand...
That is not true. LOL

There were rumors of what Epstein was doing long before Trump banned him from Mar-A-Lago .... Where do you think Trump's comment that Epstein liked women "on the younger side" came from? It seems like Trump had an inkling ...

.... and you still haven't answered the question : Why was Alex Acosta hired in the first place? Trump knew of that plea deal.

.... but there is no proof that either Trump or Winfrey knew of the crimes of Epstein and Weinstein before they became public. Your position on who to defend is transparently political. You don't care about the sex abuse. You care about politics, and supporting your tribe. Pathetic.
 
Last edited:
#37,946
#37,946
luthervol said:
Do you understand that trumpism makes it worse? I'm guessing not.
Click to expand...
I am unable to process your assertion without a clear definition of “Trumpism”, specifically what separates it from basic “conservatism”. Is it a difference in policy or in personality? Honest question
A parallel question would be, let’s say Trump pulled a Biden and announced that, due to illness, he was dropping out of the 2024 race and that JD Vance was now the Republican candidate for President, would you still consider the ticket to be an example of “Trumpism” and could you possibly support it?
 
#37,947
#37,947
LSU-SIU said:
There are no parties. That is why Trump is a thing, that and nuts like you. The republican leadership and donors did not want Trump as that gives a person a choice which they don't control.
😂

As I mentioned, I don't think you're making much sense... they programmed you to want Trump eliminated for a reason.
Click to expand...
Who are they? 😂

You say the same things over and over and over and over. You make the exact same arguments over and over and over and over.

If anyone is programmed, it's you.

Nice day
 
  • Like
Reactions: luthervol
#37,948
#37,948
luthervol said:
That's complete nonsense.

It is so clear that you have been brain-screwed by an overload of right wing bs.
Click to expand...

It has nothing to do with some third parties bs. What you are doing is saying the Republicans should give a candidate that you approve of so that TPTB will have full control no matter the outcome. In your case, you vote doesn't even matter as you're not even voting. You are Mr. Irrelevant.... by your own words there should have been a good candidate for you to vote for under the democratic process, yet you are blaming the make believe Rs of not have a good primary candidate.
 
Last edited:
#37,949
#37,949
BernardKingGOAT said:
Who are they? 😂

You say the same things over and over and over and over. You make the exact same arguments over and over and over and over.

If anyone is programmed, it's you.

Nice day
Click to expand...

There is no difference between any of these candidates, if they don't bend the knee they have no chance. Trump was the odd out that made it through, been like that since Reagan.

That is the only reason Trump is a thing. Nobody gives a **** about Republicans this or that. It never was about Rs v Ds, it was always about the one coin. Every election until 2016 the never really cared who won, they would have rather Bush 1 over Clinton but Clinton was already on the same payroll. Other than that the elections haven't meant anything until 2016.

Have a great day in Fantasy Land.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top