2024 Presidential Race

#37,982
#37,982

Chris Cuomo Says Harris Is ‘Hiding’ From Media Because ‘There’s Risk’ With Her Compared To Past Dem Nominees​


NewsNation host Chris Cuomo said during a Thursday podcast that Vice President Kamala Harris is avoiding the media because she is more vulnerable than previous Democratic presidential nominees.

Harris still has not sat down for an interview one month into her presidential campaign, and she is slated to accept the Democratic nomination for president on Thursday, two days after former President Barack Obama and first lady Michelle Obama’s Democratic National Convention (DNC) speeches. Cuomo, on “The Chris Cuomo Project,” said Harris is “hiding” from the press because of the “risk” involved, something that was not a factor for Obama and other Democratic presidential nominees, who he suggested were more talented. (RELATED: Over Three-Fifths Of Americans Believe Kamala Harris Covered Up Biden’s Health Issues, Polls Find)

Chris Cuomo Says Harris Is ‘Hiding’ From Media Because ‘There’s Risk’ With Her Compared To Past Dem Nominees

Chris Cuomo said that Vice President Kamala Harris is avoiding the media because she is more vulnerable than previous Democratic presidential nominees.
dailycaller.com
 
  • Like
Reactions: marcusluvsvols, USF grad in TN and norrislakevol
#37,984
#37,984
luthervol said:
Trumpism - The belief that:
trump is a positive force for the country.
the left is an enemy to be defeated and that compromise is weakness.
MTG is anything but a complete national embarrassment.
the 2020 election was stolen.
the belief that Fox news is more accurate and reliable than ABC, NYT, CNN, NBC, CBS, NPR, AP ..........
Click to expand...
Okay, I get that. But I still can’t seem to convert that into a working definition. I mean, I can’t tell if you would consider me a “Trumpist” or not as I
1) Don’t necessarily believe that Trump is a positive force for our country but I do believe he is better than the alternative
2) the left itself is not an enemy that needs to be defeated but I do feel that the left has been hijacked by radicals and that the democrat party needs to be returned to patriotic centrist progressives
3) totally agree that MTG is an embarrassment
4) don’t believe that the 2020 election was “stolen” but I do believe that election officials in several states did all they could to put their thumbs on the scales and that any uncertainties were decided in favor of Biden
5). Fox is not “more reliable” than the other media members. They are all biased. Fox is just biased in the opposite direction. The truth as always lies somewhere in the middle

So would you consider me a Trumpist or merely a traditional conservative who will reluctantly vote for Trump as the more palatable of two imperfect choices?
 
  • Like
Reactions: USF grad in TN
#37,985
#37,985
Majors said:
Oh, “rumors” but you’re acting like Oprah never heard anything about Harvey while she was praising him. Best unkept secret in Hollywood was Harvey..but just rumors.

Keep being gullible in your defense. Who else are you going to sidebar with? You never answered John the God or the school in Africa…so not sure I need to address Acosta and his resignation while you skip go.
Click to expand...
My point is that you are being inconsistent, but are too partisan to understand that. You are taking "rumors" and insisting that Oprah knew about Weinstein's crimes because of them .... but at the same time, defending Trump for basically the same set of circumstances. It's a politically motivated, double-standard that you are too biased to see in yourself.

I'm not defending anyone. I'm simply applying the same logic to both Trump and Winfrey. There is no proof that either one of them were aware of the crimes of Weinstein and Epstein .... before they became public.

You don't know of a good excuse for why Donald Trump appointed Alex Acosta as Secretary of Labor. So you ignore it.
 
#37,990
#37,990
OrangeTsar said:
Okay, I get that. But I still can’t seem to convert that into a working definition. I mean, I can’t tell if you would consider me a “Trumpist” or not as I
1) Don’t necessarily believe that Trump is a positive force for our country but I do believe he is better than the alternative
2) the left itself is not an enemy that needs to be defeated but I do feel that the left has been hijacked by radicals and that the democrat party needs to be returned to patriotic centrist progressives
3) totally agree that MTG is an embarrassment
4) don’t believe that the 2020 election was “stolen” but I do believe that election officials in several states did all they could to put their thumbs on the scales and that any uncertainties were decided in favor of Biden
5). Fox is not “more reliable” than the other media members. They are all biased. Fox is just biased in the opposite direction. The truth as always lies somewhere in the middle

So would you consider me a Trumpist or merely a traditional conservative who will reluctantly vote for Trump as the more palatable of two imperfect choices?
Click to expand...
I would put you at about a 20 on a scale of 1-100 on the Trumpist continuum.

I almost came up with a series of weighted questions that would allow one to calculate their own personal Trumpist score.
 
#37,992
#37,992
BowlBrother85 said:
My point is that you are being inconsistent, but are too partisan to understand that. You are taking "rumors" and insisting that Oprah knew about Weinstein's crimes because of them .... but at the same time, defending Trump for basically the same set of circumstances. It's a politically motivated, double-standard that you are too biased to see in yourself.

I'm not defending anyone. I'm simply applying the same logic to both Trump and Winfrey. There is no proof that either one of them were aware of the crimes of Weinstein and Epstein .... before they became public.

You don't know of a good excuse for why Donald Trump appointed Alex Acosta as Secretary of Labor. So you ignore it.
Click to expand...
Your point is to deflect. That is your only point not to say Oprah screwed up, but you deflect. She enabled a rapist. And she is the most powerful woman in media, but please respond back on how she didn’t know.

I’ll allow you the final word, excuse.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SpaceCoastVol
#37,994
#37,994
LSU-SIU said:
Why isn't he a positive force for the country?

Luther no offense but you're not even grasping the simple statement made by c-south, well a statement in the form of a question.

You are simply voting for who they tell you to vote for, that's not my problem... but you trying to make sense of this is not good.
Click to expand...
Luther is eaten up with blind hatred
 
  • Like
Reactions: UT_Dutchman and LSU-SIU
#37,998
#37,998

Mystery Item Falls Out of Nancy Pelosi's Pants during her DNC speech...and the internet has a wild theory​


Nancy Pelosi sparked a frenzy of online speculation during her Democratic National Convention speech on Wednesday, but not for the reasons she would have hoped.

As the 84-year-old former House speaker walked out on stage to address the jubilant crowd, a mystery white object dropped out of her pants.

Critics were giddy with claims that it was a piece of discarded toilet paper that dropped to the floor as she approached the podium.

She even looked back to see what she had left behind as she prepared to give her remarks in Chicago before the keynote from vice presidential nominee and Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz.


She even looked back to see what she had left behind as she prepared to give her remarks in Chicago before the keynote from vice presidential nominee and Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz.




1724346996106.png

Mystery item falls out of Nancy Pelosi's pants during her DNC speech

As the 84-year-old former House speaker walked out on stage to address the jubilant crowd, a mystery white object dropped out of her pants.
www.dailymail.co.uk
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top