2024 Presidential Race

#46,527
#46,527
swampfoxfan said:
And the Republicans can't stand feeding the poor, housing the homeless or treating the sick. Among other things. Love your neighbors as long as they are not Asian Hispanic Arabic or black. Or poor especially poor.

The Republican Jesus would have charged for the fish on the mountain. No free rides here, then he would have sold sandals and bibles.
Click to expand...
Quick question, do you still believe one or both of the Trump assassination attempts to be fake?
 
  • Like
Reactions: InVOLuntary
#46,528
#46,528
BowlBrother85 said:
The sources listed 1-15 below are what I primarily link.

My "narratives" are the facts. I love how the word "narrative" has become so common-place now. Right-wingers see and hear it used in political circles and repeat it, because they think it makes them appear to be articulate. It doesn't. It makes you look like simple-minded tools, who can't think for themselves.

1) Newsweek
2) Forbes
3) The Wall Street Journal
4) The Economist
5) Fortune
6) USA Today
7) The New York Times
8) The Washington Post
9) CBS News
10) ABC News
11) NBC News
12) Brookings
13) Time
14) PBS
15) CNN

If you think they are propaganda, then you are the one with the skewed perspective ... not me.

(.... and I can only imagine what you must think of @W.TN.Orange Blood 's sources, if you don't have any respect for the sources up above ..... but that's not it at all. I called his sources propaganda and you are childishly projecting.)

How original of you!
Click to expand...

Yes, you only post the propaganda that supports your narrative and ignore everything and anything that disputes it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: InVOLuntary and whodeycin85
#46,530
#46,530
Sudden Impact said:
Are you saying that Republicans are donating more $$$$ to Harris' campaign?
Are you saying that Republicans' donations to Trump are more per individual than Harris' donations per individual?
Either way Harris is raising more money than Trump so that is not a good sign for Trump.
Explains the $100,000 watches, the shoes, and NFT grifts.
Click to expand...

Obviously I should have made my post clearer for those who are mentally challenged.

My post was in response to a poster who claimed Dems donate more to charity.
 
  • Like
Reactions: InVOLuntary and dovervolz
#46,531
#46,531
BowlBrother85 said:
The sources listed 1-15 below are what I primarily link.

My "narratives" are the facts. I love how the word "narrative" has become so common-place now. Right-wingers see and hear it used in political circles and repeat it, because they think it makes them appear to be articulate. It doesn't. It makes you look like simple-minded tools, who can't think for themselves.

1) Newsweek
2) Forbes
3) The Wall Street Journal
4) The Economist
5) Fortune
6) USA Today
7) The New York Times
8) The Washington Post
9) CBS News
10) ABC News
11) NBC News
12) Brookings
13) Time
14) PBS
15) CNN

If you think they are propaganda, then you are the one with the skewed perspective ... not me.

(.... and I can only imagine what you must think of @W.TN.Orange Blood 's sources, if you don't have any respect for the sources up above ..... but that's not it at all. I called his sources propaganda and you are childishly projecting.)

How original of you!
Click to expand...

Which ones had you believing that a laptop and diary were fake and had you arguing it with every ounce of Jim Beam you drank?
 
  • Like
Reactions: InVOLuntary and whodeycin85
#46,532
#46,532

Tim Walz Said He Was in Hong Kong During the Tiananmen Square Massacre. He Was Home in Nebraska.​


Walz’s claims in 2014 congressional hearing are a Tall Tale, Video and local news reports show​


1727749586488.png

At a 2014 congressional hearing held to mark the 25th anniversary of the Tiananmen Square massacre, Tim Walz, then a congressman representing Minnesota’s first district, recalled being in Hong Kong when the Chinese Communist Party crushed the student protests that had roiled the country since mid-April of 1989. The unforgettable crackdown came on June 4 of that year.

freebeacon.com

Tim Walz Said He Was in Hong Kong During the Tiananmen Square Massacre. He Was Home in Nebraska.

At a 2014 congressional hearing held to mark the 25th anniversary of the Tiananmen Square massacre, Tim Walz, then a congressman representing Minnesota’s first district, recalled being in Hong Kong when the Chinese Communist Party crushed the student protests that had roiled the country since...
freebeacon.com freebeacon.com
 
  • Like
Reactions: InVOLuntary
#46,533
#46,533
swampfoxfan said:
And the Republicans can't stand feeding the poor, housing the homeless or treating the sick. Among other things. Love your neighbors as long as they are not Asian Hispanic Arabic or black. Or poor especially poor.

The Republican Jesus would have charged for the fish on the mountain. No free rides here, then he would have sold sandals and bibles.
Click to expand...
Tell you what. You drive over to East Tennessee and Western North Carolina and see who the most prevalent workers are who are feeding people, cleaning up debris, and helping out. It will NOT be government bureaucrats. It will be those humble Jesus followers from congregations all over America. And most of them will be from Red States.
Do you have any INKLING just how much Churches and religions charities do to feed, clothe, treat, and house people do each year?
So frankly, I don’t think you have the slightest idea what you are going on about. Yeah, there are loud mouth people calling themselves Christians but not acting like it. But 90% of the folks are quite humble people who quietly go about doing the Lord’s work, not seeking the lime light because they aren’t doing it for praise from
Men.
I Fear you have let your political hatred of conservatives cloud your vision in this matter. The Church (capital C, the body of all believers) is not a political movement, despite people on both sides of the aisle trying to claim it as their own. God’s work transcends politics, race, nationality, sex, economic status, or any other category that man dreams up. Yes it is full of imperfect people and has plenty of charlatans and con men. But you wouldn’t recognize what society looked like without it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HammondB3Vol, TN-POSSUM, InVOLuntary and 4 others
#46,534
#46,534
BowlBrother85 said:
The sources listed 1-15 below are what I primarily link.

My "narratives" are the facts. I love how the word "narrative" has become so common-place now. Right-wingers see and hear it used in political circles and repeat it, because they think it makes them appear to be articulate. It doesn't. It makes you look like simple-minded tools, who can't think for themselves.

1) Newsweek
2) Forbes
3) The Wall Street Journal
4) The Economist
5) Fortune
6) USA Today
7) The New York Times
8) The Washington Post
9) CBS News
10) ABC News
11) NBC News
12) Brookings
13) Time
14) PBS
15) CNN

If you think they are propaganda, then you are the one with the skewed perspective ... not me.

(.... and I can only imagine what you must think of @W.TN.Orange Blood 's sources, if you don't have any respect for the sources up above ..... but that's not it at all. I called his sources propaganda and you are childishly projecting.)

How original of you!
Click to expand...
Yeah…….about that……
 
#46,535
#46,535
BowlBrother85 said:
The sources listed 1-15 below are what I primarily link.

My "narratives" are the facts. I love how the word "narrative" has become so common-place now. Right-wingers see and hear it used in political circles and repeat it, because they think it makes them appear to be articulate. It doesn't. It makes you look like simple-minded tools, who can't think for themselves.

1) Newsweek
2) Forbes
3) The Wall Street Journal
4) The Economist
5) Fortune
6) USA Today
7) The New York Times
8) The Washington Post
9) CBS News
10) ABC News
11) NBC News
12) Brookings
13) Time
14) PBS
15) CNN

If you think they are propaganda, then you are the one with the skewed perspective ... not me.

(.... and I can only imagine what you must think of @W.TN.Orange Blood 's sources, if you don't have any respect for the sources up above ..... but that's not it at all. I called his sources propaganda and you are childishly projecting.)

How original of you!
Click to expand...
0E43BDD3-FD34-43B6-BB02-63FFF036E7CE.jpeg
 
  • Like
Reactions: TN-POSSUM, USF grad in TN, norrislakevol and 2 others
#46,538
#46,538
dovervolz said:
Wow, somebody at the Communist News Network will get fired in the morning
Click to expand...
CNN has been hedging their bets lately. See Scott Jennings. They know which way the wind is blowing and don’t want to lose access when the Republicans take back power come January. Unlike ABC who is going to find themselves shut out
 
  • Like
Reactions: dovervolz
#46,539
#46,539
dovervolz said:
Wow, somebody at the Communist News Network will get fired in the morning
Click to expand...
CNN has been hedging their bets lately. See Scott Jennings. They know which way the wind is blowing and don’t want to lose access when the Republicans take back power come January. Unlike ABC who is going to find themselves shut out in the cold
 
#46,540
#46,540
OrangeTsar said:
CNN has been hedging their bets lately. See Scott Jennings. They know which way the wind is blowing and don’t want to lose access when the Republicans take back power come January. Unlike ABC who is going to find themselves shut out in the cold
Click to expand...
Don't forget Iran
 
#46,544
#46,544
BowlBrother85 said:
The sources listed 1-15 below are what I primarily link.

My "narratives" are the facts. I love how the word "narrative" has become so common-place now. Right-wingers see and hear it used in political circles and repeat it, because they think it makes them appear to be articulate. It doesn't. It makes you look like simple-minded tools, who can't think for themselves.

1) Newsweek
2) Forbes
3) The Wall Street Journal
4) The Economist
5) Fortune
6) USA Today
7) The New York Times
8) The Washington Post
9) CBS News
10) ABC News
11) NBC News
12) Brookings
13) Time
14) PBS
15) CNN

If you think they are propaganda, then you are the one with the skewed perspective ... not me.

(.... and I can only imagine what you must think of @W.TN.Orange Blood 's sources, if you don't have any respect for the sources up above ..... but that's not it at all. I called his sources propaganda and you are childishly projecting.)

How original of you!
Click to expand...
😂 🤡
 
  • Like
Reactions: InVOLuntary
#46,545
#46,545
OrangeTsar said:
CNN has been hedging their bets lately. See Scott Jennings. They know which way the wind is blowing and don’t want to lose access when the Republicans take back power come January. Unlike ABC who is going to find themselves shut out
Click to expand...
It would be hilarious. Hopefully Trump will stop taking questions like his predecessors
 
#46,549
#46,549
BowlBrother85 said:
I'm pretty sure that is the only time I have ever used alternet.org .... It does lean left.

However, in that particular article, I think it makes it's case pretty well that Trump flip-flops based on the will of his wealthiest donors. I probably should have used a different source for such an argument ... and I easily could have. That is an easy case to make.
Click to expand...
Most of the sites (e.g., NYT, Wapo, Time, CNN) you post “lean left”.

I don’t see you post WSJ (for example) as much as the others.
 
  • Like
Reactions: InVOLuntary
#46,550
#46,550
C-south said:
Which ones had you believing that a laptop and diary were fake and had you arguing it with every ounce of Jim Beam you drank?
Click to expand...
For one thing, I do not drink Jim Beam. It's horse pi$$. I drink Crown Royal.

As far as not believing in the diary goes .... that was mostly from not trusting the couple who discovered the diary, for obvious reasons. They clearly saw it as an opportunity to make money from the moment they found it, and therefore, had every incentive in the world to tamper with it, if it didn't include any salacious content. The diary was also in possession of Project Veritas in between the time Ashley Biden last had it, and when it was handed over to the police. They have an established history of tampering with evidence and bribing witnesses to lie for them. So, being skeptical of the authenticity of the contents of the diary was not an unreasonable position to take based on those facts. I didn't need a source of news to be skeptical of it .... I was skeptical of it on my own.

But if it's legit? I can at least admit when I was wrong. That is more than what can be said for the Cult of Trump 2020 Presidential Election deniers on here.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top