2024 Presidential Race

#58,226
#58,226
evillawyer said:
Running it up the middle is boring, but necessary. Harris keeps on pounding the rock in PA.

Does Trump have any ground game in PA?

Click to expand...

Harris got her start in politics by running it up the middle repeatedly. She will pound anything (rocks included) if it helps her.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Proud Army Wife, 85SugarVol, CagleMtnVol and 12 others
#58,237
#58,237
hog88 said:
That's called a lie.
Click to expand...
The waitress at breakfast on Friday bragged about winning the "put the xmas tree up" argument with her wife. I asked her how long she's been married. 1.5 years. I said you didn't win anything in the long term. Old fella next to me started laughing. When she walked away, he said, you know it may be different if it is two women arguing.

I had to admit I never considered that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Vol423 and hog88
#58,239
#58,239
Majors said:
Complete overhaul of the Dem party if Trump pulls off the EV and popular. Self reflection to the oligarch and dismissing of progressive views.
Click to expand...
I'd believe that when I see it. If not for "progressive" views, what do they have? It's not the economy, middle class, not foreign policy (unless our foreign policy is to be liked). All they have are identity politics and abortion.
 
  • Like
Reactions: InVOLuntary and StarRaider
#58,241
#58,241
McDad said:
The waitress at breakfast on Friday bragged about winning the "put the xmas tree up" argument with her wife. I asked her how long she's been married. 1.5 years. I said you didn't win anything in the long term. Old fella next to me started laughing. When she walked away, he said, you know it may be different if it is two women arguing.

I had to admit I never considered that.
Click to expand...

I had to read that twice.

I'm at a loss, who does win the arguments in a lesbian relationship? I'll be noodling on that one all day, it's like trying to imagine the impossible.
 
  • Like
Reactions: InVOLuntary and McDad
#58,244
#58,244
hog88 said:
I had to read that twice.

I'm at a loss, who does win the arguments in a lesbian relationship? I'll be noodling on that one all day, it's like trying to imagine the impossible.
Click to expand...
Do we know any lesbians on the board who can provide clarity?
 
#58,245
#58,245
hUTch2002 said:
Ha! How is that the “right” thing? The best thing would be to start over but there’s zero chance of that happening. I get you don’t like Trump but Harris offers absolutely nothing. She’s not even entertaining like Biden.
Click to expand...
This is the disconnect :

Neither side wants to talk about their own candidate.

I will be the first to admit that I'm guilty of it too. I have spent very little time defending Kamala Harris, and even less time touting her policy agenda (where she has been comically vague in discussing). She has been so short on substance and specifics, I wouldn't even know how to go about defending her policies. She is a lightweight. That's being generous.

Now, having said that ....

Most conservatives / Republicans / Trump supporters on here seem just as reluctant to talk about Donald Trump. It is clear that most of you would much prefer to discuss Kamala Harris and Joe Biden than you would Trump. You make no effort to understand why I despise Trump just as much as you do Harris and Biden. I believe that Trump offers nothing but chaos. He did not demonstrate strong leadership during his first term at all. He is a narcissistic egomaniac. He is an immature blowhard, who avoids accountability and taking responsibility for anything. The buck never stops with him. Every indication is, that he only cares about himself.

They are both awful candidates. That is why I only want to talk about Trump, and you only want to talk about Harris. I will vote for Harris because I am more in favor of a liberal agenda, than I am a conservative one. Simply put, Harris will appoint liberal judges to the federal courts and the Supreme Court, and Trump will appoint more conservative judges, and I don't think we need another conservative on the Supreme Court.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Sudden Impact, LouderVol, hUTch2002 and 2 others
#58,250
#58,250
Ritzwatch said:
Probably because there are identified legitimate issues with our electoral processes that no one seems interested in resolving.
We deal with the same issues election cycle after election cycle.
We should all ask ourselves "why?"

NO ONE should have faith in this particular "institution." It should be incumbent on our government to show that the process is reliable and accurate. Where it is not, it should be incumbent on our government to be transparent in their efforts to remedy problems and to articulate a plan for eliminating those problems in future elections.

Why do we defend a flawed process when there are solutions to the problem. Once solved, people will only be able to take issue with the results, not the process. Why should the government not fix the problem rather than asking the citizens to accept problematic results?
Click to expand...
The flawed process is a feature, not a bug. It costs millions of dollars and a lot of manpower to run fraud campaigns. Same with defending them. Both parties accept this because it prevents third party entry.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ritzwatch
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top