2024 Presidential Race

[DaddyChad]

The people have spoken!

“KAMALA, you’re fired!!!!”

 

[luthervol]

I'm going over to the horse stables in a minute, I'll ask her.

That's the winning spirit.

 

[DaddyChad]

it was just a rhetorical question..

My bad I’m running on a few hours of sleep.

 

[Sudden Impact]

Maybe the problem isn’t that she was a woman. Maybe just maybe the issue is she’s not a great candidate. She’s just not one of these people that can go in interview or speak unscripted. She couldn’t disentangle herself from Biden’s failed presidency either. Numerous media outlets gave her the chance by saying what would she do different from Biden? She said nothing came to mind.

Hillary say hello. She had the credentials that any man with those credentials gets elected. Maybe you are right, but it's a man's world and a man's job. That barrier will not be broken for a while and only in a few cases. We are condition to look to a man for decisions and the woman to provide the support to make it happen. Single women are better but have too much of a soft side when coping with problems and decisions.
Her answer that stated that "nothing came to mind" would have been answered differently by a man.

 

[Orangeburst]

My bad I’m running on a few hours of sleep.

I am on 5 hours sleep and stayed up to 4AM...

 

[volinbham]

I am on 5 hours and stayed up to 4AM...

same

 

[itsme]

I just wanna know which Pharmaceutical companies I need to be long in so I can make money when Leprosy comes roaring back.

Is leprosy a big thing in the Amish community? What medical issues do they deal with with?

 

[volfanhill]

Hillary say hello. She had the credentials that any man with those credentials gets elected. Maybe you are right, but it's a man's world and a man's job. That barrier will not be broken for a while and only in a few cases. We are condition to look to a man for decisions and the woman to provide the support to make it happen. Single women are better but have too much of a soft side when coping with problems and decisions.
Her answer that stated that "nothing came to mind" would have been answered differently by a man.

Hillary wouldn't have won even if she had a penis.

 

[LSU-SIU]

That's the winning spirit.

There is no winning. This country is lost because of people like you which is why I don't vote. I make fun of Orange just as much.

I can remain hopeful you are able to overcome things in your life.

 

[Sudden Impact]

Hillary wouldn't have won even if she had a penis.

How do you know she doesn't and the night stand drawer does not count.

 

[05_never_again]

It's just unbelievable that so many of the looney leftists are convinced that they're losing elections because their candidate is a woman. No! You're losing elections because your policies are crap. I don't know a single person that votes based on gender or race. Get a grip!

Some of their policies do have public support. Their problem these last several elections is that they emphasize a lot of the ones that don't, and emphasize a cultural philosophy that plays well on far-left college campuses/far-left enclaves of big cities but not many other places.

They have an elitist, pie-in-the-sky, excessively theoretical, sanctimonious, and condescending way of talking to people, even their own voters at times.

 

[DinkinFlicka]

Bump


View attachment 694801

Start the poll thread!

 

[DaddyChad]

Is leprosy a big thing in the Amish community? What medical issues do they deal with with?

Children falling from roofs.

Seriously the kids start working above 4 or 5 years old. Some of them roofing. They ain’t scared of crap.

 

[volfanhill]

Some of their policies do have public support. Their problem these last several elections is that they emphasize a lot of the ones that don't, and emphasize a cultural philosophy that plays well on far-left college campuses/far-left enclaves of big cities but not many other places.

They have an elitist, pie-in-the-sky, excessively theoretical, sanctimonious, and condescending way of talking to people, even their own voters at times.

They are terrified of being called out by their own team for not being woke enough

 

[Vol737]

Hillary say hello. She had the credentials that any man with those credentials gets elected. Maybe you are right, but it's a man's world and a man's job. That barrier will not be broken for a while and only in a few cases. We are condition to look to a man for decisions and the woman to provide the support to make it happen. Single women are better but have too much of a soft side when coping with problems and decisions.
Her answer that stated that "nothing came to mind" would have been answered differently by a man.

I don’t think it was that Hillary was a woman. She had a history of being very sketchy and was overall not very trustworthy (destroying cell phones, shredding files at the Rose Law Firm that she likely knew the FBI would want and having hard drives bleached).

 

[LSU-SIU]

Did you forget the whole pandemic rioting thing going on? Trump will have less votes this round too.

Trump should be very close to his 2020 totals, give or take a few. The odd one out is the 2020 election, where all the votes were going to one candidate in the middle of the night. I'm sure it was nothing.

 

[05_never_again]

The markets like it. A lot of added value to 401Ks today. I might consider retiring early.

View attachment 694830

IMO, the price action would be similar if Kamala had won. I think the markets are just relieved a winner was called early and everyone can move on. Even if she did win, there would be gridlock which isn't a bad thing either.

 

[ButchPlz]

Some of their policies do have public support. Their problem these last several elections is that they emphasize a lot of the ones that don't, and emphasize a cultural philosophy that plays well on far-left college campuses/far-left enclaves of big cities but not many other places.

They have an elitist, pie-in-the-sky, excessively theoretical, sanctimonious, and condescending way of talking to people, even their own voters at times.

It's because they don't actually like their own voters either.

 

[Jack Burton]

Hillary say hello. She had the credentials that any man with those credentials gets elected. Maybe you are right, but it's a man's world and a man's job. That barrier will not be broken for a while and only in a few cases. We are condition to look to a man for decisions and the woman to provide the support to make it happen. Single women are better but have too much of a soft side when coping with problems and decisions.
Her answer that stated that "nothing came to mind" would have been answered differently by a man.

She would have won against any other republican candidate in my opinion. She just got unlucky with the timing of Trumps rise. If she had been up against Romney or Cruz she wins easily.

 

[BernardKingGOAT]

There is no winning. This country is lost because of people like you which is why I don't vote. I make fun of Orange just as much.

I can remain hopeful you are able to overcome things in your life.

What does he do, that you don't do that you believe makes the country "lost" as you say? Please provide something specific and substantive, if you can

 

[05_never_again]

I don’t think it was that Hillary was a woman. She had a history of being very sketchy and was overall not very trustworthy (destroying cell phones, shredding files at the Rose Law Firm that she likely knew the FBI would want and having hard drives bleached).

I don't think it was that either. All politicians are untrustworthy and have done sketchy things that cause controversies.

Hillary Clinton is simply not a very skilled politician. She has no charisma, can be stiff and awkward, and is not good at/does not enjoy retail politics. If she never married Bill, she would have been a partner at a law firm in Chicago somewhere with no public visibility whatsoever. Which I don't mean as an insult per se - she just would not have remotely sniffed the halls of power that she has in her life if it wasn't for her husband, who is probably one of the most skilled politicians of the last 100 years.

 

[85SugarVol]

There they go… “there are still forces for ‘good’ in this country”

The implication being what? That forces for “evil” won last night?

 

[LSU-SIU]

What does he do, that you don't do that you believe makes the country "lost" as you say? Please provide something specific and substantive, if you can

The nuts have taken over. I don't see much to save to be honest, as a whole.

 

[Vol since 77]

I thought the dems would win again, too. Maybe the electorate outside the major cities and certain states are smarter than I thought after the previous election. A couple of glaring things stand out. There is a major and growing divide in this country, and it's not regional; we have a huge metropolitan/rural divide. Atlanta bloat has made GA purple for the time being, but it will be blue all too soon. We here have our own pest control problem with Nashville growth in particular (invasive species from dem hellholes) - Memphis is just a lost cause - Chattanooga is trending. The DC bureaucracies have forever perverted and destroyed VA - not much hope that the rest of the state recovers unless it secedes from NoVA.

The "needs" of urban areas vs the necessities of rural areas are completely perverting our way of life. Urban areas are the overhead and the rural/smaller metropolitan areas are the producers; and the needs, contributions, and beliefs of the two are at complete odds. Rural areas have always been populated by more self sufficient types while cities represent those who need "services" (can't or won't deal with their own needs). As a whole, we have a backwards attitude about civilization; we strive for some hopeless thought of squeezing every ounce of productivity out of businesses (to feed investment markets and executives) without thought to the fact that the country needs to be productively employed. That neglect has a lot to do with the urban/rural divide. We have to get back to agricultural and manufacturing production in rural areas and quit skimming savings by manufacturing overseas to feed the urban corporate offices.

There is no free lunch. Both dems (in particular) and republicans need to understand that. Unemployed people will not starve in this country. You can either choose to produce in this country, or you can feed the non producing people through your taxes. We need to quit playing statistical games with terms like unemployment and get back to work. There's going to be a really hard lesson the day we as a country face the fact that we outsourced our future to a country on the attack. WW2 was all about self sufficiency ... when you forget history (especially through selective amnesia), karma is a bitch.

 

[Vol737]

I don't think it was that either. All politicians are not untrustworthy and have done sketchy things that cause controversies.

Hillary Clinton is simply not a very skilled politician. She has no charisma, can be stiff and awkward, and is not good at/does not enjoy retail politics. If she never married Bill, she would have been a partner at a law firm in Chicago somewhere with no public visibility whatsoever. Which I don't mean as an insult per se - she just would not have remotely sniffed the halls of power that she has in her life if it wasn't for her husband, who is probably one of the most skilled politicians of the last 100 years.

Yep, that’s fair.