2024 Presidential Race

I didn't say it was his fault I was expressing how it happened. Not sure you were paying attention then but he could hold on longer because of money and name recognition

Plain speak was just a bunch of things he knew some voters wanted to hear. He didn't actually do many of them and was completely unprepared for the job. His appeal is great marketing of a persona. His qualities as a leader don't match the marketing

I think he wanted the border wall. I think initially maybe he wanted to reduce the deficit. It's clear McConnell and Ryan stood in the way. I don't think we knew how much. I thought he would act more presidential but he really did have good foreign policy instincts.
 
How does anyone deserve to receive reparations from someone in Tennessee?

I don't get this whole reparations thing on a macro or mini scale. None of it makes sense that I can think of from a legal, ethical, moral or common sense stand point. Things like the Japanese Americans during WWII is much easier concept to understand to fully grasp in context.

In essence, they want the United States to provide payment to descendants of slave owners to descendants of slaves, I guess.... from which the United States wasn't a party nor actively participated, and actually spent money and resources to free. The descendants of the soldiers clearly have a better issue as they themselves were slaves to fight a war.... the United States was a party to those transactions.
 
As a married man, Willie Brown couldn't get enough
View attachment 661298
I know you can NEVER, EVER, understand this. But, I'm not Willie Brown, nor was I talking about him. You poor cognitively defective MAGAs will grasp at anything to justify your inherent bias of anyone who thinks or looks different than you. One can only pity such creatures.
 
Basically it doesn't matter who the democrats run, there are about 45% who are voting blindly even for a corpse if there is a D beside the name. Romney, McCain, and anyone else includung Trump have been and would be called the same names. These are hypocrits. It's their base party platform to push the country to the left.

Tribalism and blind loyalty exists on both sides. It’s how we’ve ended up with the likes of Trump and Kamala as our choices.
 
No, Trump benefitted greatly from a huge primary and was able to capture voters as others dropped. He's good at marketing which is what a primary like that turns into.

The arrogance that exists within the GOP shined during the primary process. If they could have come together and thrown all their oars in one boat to go against Trump, Trump isn’t the nominee. Alas, twenty people ran against him and the rest is history.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DuckInAPen
The arrogance that exists within the GOP shined during the primary process. If they could have come together and thrown all their oars in one boat to go against Trump, Trump isn’t the nominee. Alas, twenty people ran against him and the rest is history.

There really is no GOP, not really. If it were up to the leadership in the GOP Trump would have been cancelled in 2015. Right now there is the Uniparty and there is Trump.

Nobody gives a **** about the GOP.
 
Ain’t it amazing how in 3 days Kamala Harris has gone from being awkward but one of several possibilities to the unanimous choice with glowing media? The DNC put the superdelegate process in place in 2016 and has been annointing nominees ever since.
They really do share talking points and coordinate their message. A bunch of them got busted a few years back for participating in an online text/chat channel doing just that
 
  • Like
Reactions: MemphisVol77
What's best for this country is strong fiscal conservatism. More people like Rand Paul and Tim Burchett (who wants a balanced budget amendment) are what we need on congress and and the White House. Fat chance of that ever happening though.
What we need are term limits. The longer they stay the more bought and paid for they are. Serve two terms and GTFO. These lobbies wouldn't invest so much money knowing they're only in there for a relatively short while.
 
When I post similar evidence about your Trump-Jesus, you summarily dismiss it.Even mock me for it. Why then should I pay attention to your so-called evidence? I figure what's good for the goose, is good for the gander.
What do you mean calling it „so called evidence“? It is an actual tweet sent by the Vice President herself. It has not been altered in any way whatsoever. I remember when it happened. Gotta love „democrats“. You present them with actual quotes and videos of what their leaders say and they lie right to your face and call it fake evidence. There really is no hope for such willful blindness.
 

VN Store



Back
Top