LadyVol1908
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Dec 23, 2014
- Messages
- 3,971
- Likes
- 10,534
If the BHC was folded into Spyre, then kiss being competitive in women’s sports goodbye, because those people have exactly 0 interest in women’s sports and it made that very clear from the start. You’re talking to someone who was approached to give them a six-figure gift two years ago when I helped settle a major case. They will not spend a penny on women’s sports unless a sponsor demands it.
VA I think you are one of the most knowledgeable and reasonable posters we have. Thanks always for your input!
I’ve been turning this around in my head and the economics of NIL and have a question.
Let’s say a program has several all in donors and NIL is just taking off. Year one my big fish pony up $150k for a top ten recruit and two top fifties. I’m assuming that is an ongoing commitment? Year two my fish cough up another $120K for another top recruiting class in addition to the second year of $150k. This continues into years 3 and 4 so once high roller NIL has been in place several years my fish are in for $600k per year, ongoing if we want a top ten recruiting class annually. If a program is not bringing a Nattie home regularly I’m not sure this is a sustainable economic plan for hardly any program.
Tell me what I’ve got wrong here.
Thanks!
welp, guess we’re over then (blue font)If the BHC was folded into Spyre, then kiss being competitive in women’s sports goodbye, because those people have exactly 0 interest in women’s sports and it made that very clear from the start. You’re talking to someone who was approached to give them a six-figure gift two years ago when I helped settle a major case. They will not spend a penny on women’s sports unless a sponsor demands it.
If the BHC was folded into Spyre, then kiss being competitive in women’s sports goodbye, because those people have exactly 0 interest in women’s sports and it made that very clear from the start. You’re talking to someone who was approached to give them a six-figure gift two years ago when I helped settle a major case. They will not spend a penny on women’s sports unless a sponsor demands it.
Spyre is not interested in doing anything with women’s sports, which is one reason why the boost her club was put together in the first place. Several donors went to them at the start and said they wanted a certain amount of their money to go to women’s sports and the reply was that they would determine how best to distribute the money, then they declined to meet with any of the women’s coaches. They did have a role with an AT&T promotion that involved a couple of female athletes, but that was mostly because they did a larger deal with AT&T and the sponsor wanted at least two female athletes as part of the promotion. That’s the only deal they’ve shown any interest in any women’s sport on to this point.
Spyre gets a lot of attention because they are good at marketing themselves, but I don’t think things are nearly as rosy with them as people think, and I will leave it at that. They certainly aren’t getting a penny of my money.
I work in Atlanta, so I can’t have them out to our firm to sign autographs, but I personally paid for a couple of autographed sessions at charity events this past summer for both male and female athletes and paid them directly rather than going through one of the collectives. I have the ability to do that, most fans don’t. Which is why a boost her club gift is the most efficient way for the average man to help.
In a lot of cases, the donor/collective shells out the money for year one and the ongoing money is paid by businesses or individuals that do deals with the players through the collective. Sometimes that means they make more, sometimes less. But the collective offers an up front guarantee and then offsets that by signing deals for the players.VA I think you are one of the most knowledgeable and reasonable posters we have. Thanks always for your input!
I’ve been turning this around in my head and the economics of NIL and have a question.
Let’s say a program has several all in donors and NIL is just taking off. Year one my big fish pony up $150k for a top ten recruit and two top fifties. I’m assuming that is an ongoing commitment? Year two my fish cough up another $120K for another top recruiting class in addition to the second year of $150k. This continues into years 3 and 4 so once high roller NIL has been in place several years my fish are in for $600k per year, ongoing if we want a top ten recruiting class annually. If a program is not bringing a Nattie home regularly I’m not sure this is a sustainable economic plan for hardly any program.
Tell me what I’ve got wrong here.
Thanks!
Yes, some businesses they were already working with requested those two players, as I mentioned earlier in talking about the AT&T deal. They made it very clear to coaches and a couple of donors that they would not be as aggressive in pursuing deals for clients in sports other than football, men’s basketball and baseball. Part of the reason for that is their affiliated agency represents professional athletes in those three sports, which is where the real money comes in for them. Help them out while they are in school, then get them to an affiliated pro agent down the road.Didn't Spyre sponsor Jordan and TK at some point before BHC took over ? So are you saying now it wouldn't be a thing because they wouldn't be interested anymore because they were involved in some level before.
Jordan Horston - NIL Deals
Latest NIL Deals for Jordan Horston. The On3 NIL Deal Tracker lists all NIL Deals across the NCAA for college and high school athletes being reported by players, collectives, agents and media. On3 does NOT disclose deal financial terms. Financial data is undisclosed and private to the athlete.www.on3.com
Lady Vols and Spyre Sports unveil NIL deal with Orange Mountain Designs
Spyre Sports is teaming up with Lady Vol athletes to help them profit off of NIL.www.wvlt.tv
Yes, some businesses they were already working with requested those two players, as I mentioned earlier in talking about the AT&T deal. They made it very clear to coaches and a couple of donors that they would not be as aggressive in pursuing deals for clients in sports other than football, men’s basketball and baseball. Part of the reason for that is their affiliated agency represents professional athletes in those three sports, which is where the real money comes in for them. Help them out while they are in school, then get them to an affiliated pro agent down the road.
Very interesting! Seems like this could get sideways quickly if you have a “guaranteed” kid that doesn’t produce. Goodness these kids have so much pressure already. I hope there aren’t performance requirements sine this is just about Name, Image and LikenessIn a lot of cases, the donor/collective shells out the money for year one and the ongoing money is paid by businesses or individuals that do deals with the players through the collective. Sometimes that means they make more, sometimes less. But the collective offers an up front guarantee and then offsets that by signing deals for the players.
Very interesting! Seems like this could get sideways quickly if you have a “guaranteed” kid that doesn’t produce. Goodness these kids have so much pressure already. I hope there aren’t performance requirements sine this is just about Name, Image and Likeness
“CKH has no similar leverage”Do we not have any big LV boosters? Seems like a smaller amount of $ could go a lot farther in women's basketball. As a coach, I wouldn't take the LV's job unless there was enough $ in the NIL fund to land two top 30 players every year.
I think the only reason big $ is rolling into baseball NIL is because the rockstar coach would walk if it wasn't coming in. CKH has no similar leverage.
I don't fully understand Spyre's agent argument. Is there no $ in being the agent for the next Candace Parker?
So could a freshman take the first year money and then get to keep that money then get in the portal and leave. They then are immediately eligiblle somewhere else and could make another big deal for the next season at a different school without penalty of sitting out. If this is true then getting players out of the portal is the better deal cause even if they leave they have to sit a season. Plus I am seeing very few portal players leaving their second school.In a lot of cases, the donor/collective shells out the money for year one and the ongoing money is paid by businesses or individuals that do deals with the players through the collective. Sometimes that means they make more, sometimes less. But the collective offers an up front guarantee and then offsets that by signing deals for the players.
In football they have been structured in 3 year agreements to blunt that. Escalates with each year to entice the player(s) to stay. But another school could backdoor and offer more…see Williams at USC.So could a freshman take the first year money and then get to keep that money then get in the portal and leave. They then are immediately eligiblle somewhere else and could make another big deal for the next season at a different school without penalty of sitting out. If this is true then getting players out of the portal is the better deal cause even if they leave they have to sit a season. Plus I am seeing very few portal players leaving their second school.
To play the other side, could it have been that Spyre told them how it was going to be at this time based on the roster. Not everyone in men’s gets a deal. And the old guard decided feeling slighted decided to run with and form LVBC. Could have been a humbling meeting when discussing NIL evaluations at the start of the NIL eraYes, some businesses they were already working with requested those two players, as I mentioned earlier in talking about the AT&T deal. They made it very clear to coaches and a couple of donors that they would not be as aggressive in pursuing deals for clients in sports other than football, men’s basketball and baseball. Part of the reason for that is their affiliated agency represents professional athletes in those three sports, which is where the real money comes in for them. Help them out while they are in school, then get them to an affiliated pro agent down the road.
Man, the "old guard" is like really old now. They already were back in the glory days 20 yrs ago. How much influence could they still have? Hard for me to see Danny White, from what we know of him, bowing to them. And certainly not Kellie Harper and her staff who are getting clobbered in high school recruiting.To play the other side, could it have been that Spyre told them how it was going to be at this time based on the roster. Not everyone in men’s gets a deal. And the old guard decided feeling slighted decided to run with and form LVBC. Could have been a humbling meeting when discussing NIL evaluations at the start of the NIL era