As someone who loved Kellie (but found some of her coaching decisions and recruiting lacking), I'll say that Kim made a first good impression on me. She struck me as exactly the combination of vibes you would expect under the circumstances: Eager, confident, a bit overwhelmed, a little uncertain, affable, determined. She seems to truly believe that she can succeed at a high level at Tennessee. I didn't hear her over- promising, and that's a good thing. It means she's realistic.
I'm still skeptical about the system until I see it in action. I know other coaches will be scheming to stop it. The problem with platooning is that you can't just find the players who best fit your system and leave them out there. You also have to have balance, meaning having to incorporate the slower players and try to hide them. You can't just bring in a weaker second line and hope to sustain the press; they'll get eaten alive.
I really dislike the track meet style of basketball of just running back and forth down the floor and flinging up the first open shot. It's a big reason I prefer college to pros and women's basketball to men's (in general, although the run 'n' gun offenses have settled down a lot). Kim's system sounds more organized than chaos. It should be more entertaining than the offenses we've seen at Tennessee based upon offensive rebounding (which won SC and undefeated championship season, btw), so we're in the wait-and-see mode.
I think Edie might actually thrive in this system.