Huh? Alabama was getting in over LSU already. This helps our SOS. I couldn’t care less about any other effect of this game.
No they actually werent guaranteed to. The new rules result in 3+ team ties to focus more on the overall conference records of conference opponents. Putting them very much in it at 3-2 before this game, though their situation very much relied on the outcome of the Tennessee-Georgia game.
Off the top of my head: if Missouri loses to Arkansas (which is very feasible), Georgia beats Tennessee, and A&M beats Texas: LSU would then have had the tiebreaker over every other 2-conference-loss team in the 3+ team ties (conference opponents' winning percentage, as most of these teams don't share enough common opponents for records against those teams to be the determining tiebreaker), as long as Miss State didn't upset Ole Miss to end the season.
Likewise, if Missouri loses to both South Carolina and Arkansas (which, again, very feasible) and Georgia beats Tennessee: LSU would then have had the tiebreaker over every other 2-conference-loss team (including the Texas/A&M loser) in the 3+ team ties again conference opponents' conference winning percentage), provided that either didn't happen: (A) 3-win Auburn over A&M or (B)
both 2-win Miss State over Ole Miss AND Vanderbilt over Tennessee.
It's unfortunately not a tiebreaker Tennessee can rely on this year against anyone other than maybe Texas, as our conference opponents' conference game winning percentage is - even with this game being won by UF - still sitting in a spot that looks to be around a maybe .340-.350 range...making the multiple teams tiebreaker this year very much not in TN's favor/corner.