9/11 Conspiracy Thread

#326
#326
What about the vault that was emptied in the basement of WTC 7. There is a reason you can find so much info on the thermite and all that. To keep you occupied. Look into what was located in the places hit, which major corporations benefited from the event and which ones were in hot water before hand that lost potentially incriminating evidence in the attacks. You'll find it is a lot harder to find the info and most of the times when you do, it gets wiped off the internet. I posted a link earlier covering only 2 of the players involved. As I get free time I'll see if I can recover more. I had a very interesting 2 hour video that went in to major detail but....it has been deleted from YouTube
 
#327
#327
AirVol said:
The owner already admitted it was a controlled demolition. Too bad the media leads us to believe otherwise.
Click to expand...

I know. I'm just waiting for more tin foil, conspiracy jokes.

There is no explanation but controlled demo..
 
#329
#329
AirVol said:
The owner already admitted it was a controlled demolition. Too bad the media leads us to believe otherwise.
Click to expand...

I'm guessing you are involved in civil demolition, or have some other expertise in that field. Is the term "pull it" commonly used as an industry colloquialism for "intentionally demolish"?

Or, given the context, was he suggesting that the firefighters pull out of the building to avoid any further loss of life?
 
#334
#334
bamawriter said:
I'm guessing you are involved in civil demolition, or have some other expertise in that field. Is the term "pull it" commonly used as an industry colloquialism for "intentionally demolish"?

Or, given the context, was he suggesting that the firefighters pull out of the building to avoid any further loss of life?
Click to expand...

volfanhill said:
I think you do not realize that the word "pull" does not mean what you think it does.

https://sites.google.com/site/wtc7lies/is"pullusedbydemolitionsprostomean"demol
Click to expand...

Silverstein said "pull it" meaning in demo terms, pull it down. He didn't say "pull them" as in the firefighters, because that would be left to the fire Chief, he gives that order.
 
#336
#336
June 30, 2006




CDI: 'Pull It' Means 'Pull It Down'





For those who still question what Larry Silverstein meant when he said "pull it" when talking about the collapse of the WTC 7, Jeff from PumpItOut.com called demolition experts Controlled Demolition, Inc (CDI) and asked them what "pull it" means in demolition terms. This is what CDI told him:

Click here to listen to conversation






Female receptionist: Good afternoon, Loizeaux Company.
Jeff: Um, sorry, do I -- is this Controlled Demolitions?
CDI: Yes it is.
Jeff: Ok, I was wondering if there was someone I could talk to briefly -- just ask a question I had?
CDI: Well what kind of question?
Jeff: Well I just wanted to know what a term meant in demolition terms.
CDI: Ok, what type of term?
Jeff: Well, if you were in the demolition business and you said the, the term "pull it," I was wondering what exactly that would mean?
CDI: "Pull it"?
Jeff: Yeah.
CDI: Hmm? Hold on a minute.
Jeff: Thank you.
CDI: Sir?
Jeff: Yes?
CDI: "Pull it" is when they actually pull it down.
Jeff: Oh, well thank you very much for your time.
CDI: Ok.
Jeff: Bye.
CDI: Bye.






(Remember that Controlled Demolitions, Inc was hired to help with the clean up at ground zero.)
 
#337
#337
AirVol said:
Silverstein said "pull it" meaning in demo terms, pull it down. He didn't say "pull them" as in the firefighters, because that would be left to the fire Chief, he gives that order.
Click to expand...

Did he clarify this or are you just assuming that's what he meant?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#338
#338
Pacer92 said:
Pull could mean lots of things, but combined with video of pronounced demo blasts in wtc 7, your argument doesn't hold much...
Click to expand...

There are no demo blasts in any of the videos.

You can't just say "there's a demo blast" and just expect it to be true.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#339
#339
AirVol said:
Silverstein said "pull it" meaning in demo terms, pull it down. He didn't say "pull them" as in the firefighters, because that would be left to the fire Chief, he gives that order.
Click to expand...

You didn't answer my question. Is "pull it" a common term used for "intentionally demolish"?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#340
#340
AirVol said:
June 30, 2006




CDI: 'Pull It' Means 'Pull It Down'...





...(Remember that Controlled Demolitions, Inc was hired to help with the clean up at ground zero.)
Click to expand...

But even if it was a controlled demolition, WTC 7 wasn't pulled down. Pulling down a building is done with cabling and a piece of heavy equipment. If WTC 7 was an intentionally demolished, then the term "pull it" still makes absolutely no sense in context.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#343
#343
Can we take a break from discussing the collapse of the building and you guys watch the video I linked and give me your thoughts. Nobody has debunked any of the issues brought up in there, to my knowledge. Just watch ten minutes at a time of you have to but I want some feedback from those who believe the official report on that video. And also the link I posted that says "two computer rooms hit in towers".
 
#345
#345
volfanngatorland said:
World Trade Center 7 Report Puts 9/11 Conspiracy Theory to Rest

Footage that kills the conspiracy theories: Rare footage shows WTC 7 consumed by fire | Daily Mail Online
Click to expand...

You can also clearly see in videos of the Tower 2 collapse that the structural support breaks down on the floors where the fire is burning.

The insulation on the metal beams (put there to keep the beams from getting too hot in a fire and reaching the point of instability) failed, the structure lost adequate support, and the building collapsed.
 
#346
#346
volfanngatorland said:
Did he clarify this or are you just assuming that's what he meant?
Click to expand...

The 7 WTC 'pull it' controversy.
• Apparently Larry Silverstein tries to explain something to us in the 2002 PBS documentary ‘America Rebuilds’:
“I remember getting a call from the, uh, fire department commander, telling me that they were not sure they were gonna be able to contain the fire, and I said, "You know, we've had such terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is, is pull it. And they made that decision to pull and then we watched the building collapse.”I mailed Jowenko BV and asked if 'pull' was an industry term for 'demolish'. They said it wasn't. Implosionworld said the same thing. I run into the same problem when looking into different dictionaries. There is always a distinction made between 'pull down', 'pull away' and 'pull back'. And I have not been able to find one person on the internet who uses this word as a substitute for 'demolish'. So I think it's safe to assume that Larry needs to clarify what he meant, but unfortunately he refuses to do that.
Click to expand...

Why doesn't Larry clarify what he meant? Maybe he said something he shouldn't have.
 
#350
#350
Pacer92 said:
Those are coffee pots exploding I suppose.....

Cant make people see what they don't want to see..
Click to expand...

Here in downtown Nashville, a few months back they demolished a parking structure to make way for a new high rise. The structure was only about 4 stories tall and was a block and a half away from my office. The sound of that blast in my building sounded like the world was coming down around me. There is nothing on the videos anyone has linked that is even remotely close to that sound. And while I have no knowledge of controlled demolitions, I'm willing to bet that the blast needed to take down a 47 story building is a lot greater than what's needed to take down a 4 story parking structure.

So no, there is no controlled blast in those videos. None. It simply sounds like a building falling.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top